+ Visit Aberdeen FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 10 of 15 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 147

Thread: Aberdeen v St Mirren

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    32,331
    The red card last night
    Their 3rd goal last night
    The goal against Darvel
    Kent & Barišić at Hampden

    If any of this happened in the world famous Glasgow derby, they would be talking about it for years. It’s only Aberdeen though, so it doesn’t matter a f*ck

    Fast losing the will to care/live

  2. #92
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    The red card last night
    Their 3rd goal last night
    The goal against Darvel
    Kent & Barišić at Hampden

    If any of this happened in the world famous Glasgow derby, they would be talking about it for years. It’s only Aberdeen though, so it doesn’t matter a f*ck

    Fast losing the will to care/live
    This^ but some fans dont deserve a good aberdeen team! 1000s of fans from each of the other 9 clubs need to band together that would force our **** bag club/chairmen to speak out & the other 9 also.

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    5,784
    Quote Originally Posted by Br0chred View Post
    You come out with some right shyte min
    "playing a back 5 against St Mirren" FFS your two full backs I presume are Kennedy and Hayes, not exactly defensive anti fitba is it? I am not a Robson fan but come on
    To be to rj though Barry Robson said in his post match interview he had to change from a back 5 to a back 4 because McCrorie got sent off.

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,959
    Quote Originally Posted by rico94 View Post
    To be to rj though Barry Robson said in his post match interview he had to change from a back 5 to a back 4 because McCrorie got sent off.
    But it's not a back 5 though is it. It's a back three with two wingers playing as wing backs in what was an attacking line up. RJ was inferring that we were playing 5 defenders which is what I described it as.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    390
    Quote Originally Posted by Br0chred View Post
    But it's not a back 5 though is it. It's a back three with two wingers playing as wing backs in what was an attacking line up. RJ was inferring that we were playing 5 defenders which is what I described it as.
    He was inferring that, my questioning of the 532 is that it hasn't generally been working. I suppose it might have last night, but didn't get much chance. Then of course we have two attacking full backs in a back four so not ideal.

    Basically, we should rightly gloss over last night as it didn't tell us anything due losing a player so early...on to the next one.

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Br0chred View Post
    You come out with some right shyte min
    "playing a back 5 against St Mirren" FFS your two full backs I presume are Kennedy and Hayes, not exactly defensive anti fitba is it? I am not a Robson fan but come on
    When Kennedy and Hayes are the full backs (of a back 5) are they part of a structured defence or not? It wouldn’t matter if you put Duk and Miovski at full back….a full back is a defender.
    Against the likes of St.Mirren you shouldn’t need 5 defenders to start a match…that is horrific management. I wanted Robson to do well last night but Jeezo, that was ridiculous.

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    5,784
    Quote Originally Posted by Br0chred View Post
    But it's not a back 5 though is it. It's a back three with two wingers playing as wing backs in what was an attacking line up. RJ was inferring that we were playing 5 defenders which is what I described it as.
    That’s what Robson called it.

    It’s irrelevant anyway he started the game with 3 at the back and 2 holding midfielders in front of them.

    Not the most attacking of lineups considering it was St Mirren we were playing.

    Anyway let’s see how he gets on against Motherwell on Saturday with 11 players.

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,943
    Why not call the 2 full backs wingers? Maybe considering they were camped in and around our own box would suggest they were playing as full backs. Whatever it was….it was dreadful. Boooooooo to defensive football especially when the team can’t defend anyway.

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    3,813
    Quote Originally Posted by RED_JOHN View Post
    Why not call the 2 full backs wingers? Maybe considering they were camped in and around our own box would suggest they were playing as full backs. Whatever it was….it was dreadful. Boooooooo to defensive football especially when the team can’t defend anyway.
    You just can't help yourself can you.

    We are garbage at the moment with no confidence and an imbalanced squad. Pep, Klopp, Ancelotti or whoever is classed as a top manager nowadays, would have lined us up little different last night. Most sane, rational fans would have taken a sh*t 1-0 win last night before kick off and not given a sh*t about the performance.

    I actually thought, all things considered, we played OK last night.

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    287
    Quote Originally Posted by TheDeeDon View Post
    You just can't help yourself can you.

    We are garbage at the moment with no confidence and an imbalanced squad. Pep, Klopp, Ancelotti or whoever is classed as a top manager nowadays, would have lined us up little different last night. Most sane, rational fans would have taken a sh*t 1-0 win last night before kick off and not given a sh*t about the performance.

    I actually thought, all things considered, we played OK last night.

    No, no, no. We should always be playing with the flair of the 1970 Brazil team. There are no excuses for Aberdeen not to be producing this, and to accept a win playing any other way is most definitely not acceptable.

    We demand to be amongst the world's elite. Anything less shows no ambition.

    Sack the new manager (whoever it may be)

Page 10 of 15 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •