+ Visit Newcastle United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Lineker, the question now is?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    25,047

    Lineker, the question now is?

    Now that the BBC has apologised to Gary Lineker, and reappointed him to his former post the questions which do need to be answered are, who put pressure on the BBC to remove Lineker from his post and secondly, who at the BBC took the decision to comply with that pressure.

    Considering the two questions, the whole point of the dispute was that where Lineker posted his comments had sod all to do with the BBC.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    25,862
    Well, it's quite clear. The pressure predominantly came from the right wing press and from Tory MPs. Zero pressure would have been the result of a pro-Gov't tweet.

    The Director General is a former prospective Tory MP and the chairman is a prolific Tory donor to the tune of £400 grand who also helped Boris Johnson secure an £800 000 loan. Those are just facts; whether they had any influence on the decision to suspend him is down to personal opinion.

    Of course they did. 😁

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    25,047
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippity View Post
    Well, it's quite clear. The pressure predominantly came from the right wing press and from Tory MPs. Zero pressure would have been the result of a pro-Gov't tweet.

    The Director General is a former prospective Tory MP and the chairman is a prolific Tory donor to the tune of £400 grand who also helped Boris Johnson secure an £800 000 loan. Those are just facts; whether they had any influence on the decision to suspend him is down to personal opinion.

    Of course they did. ��
    Exactly Zip. But how many of those other supporters will admit it, or acknowledge that all bad deeds, and even those that lead to wars, begin with bad words from biased people who ought to have the sense to know better but who are so far into prejudice that they can't reason the truth.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    2,333
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippity View Post
    Well, it's quite clear. The pressure predominantly came from the right wing press and from Tory MPs. Zero pressure would have been the result of a pro-Gov't tweet.

    The Director General is a former prospective Tory MP and the chairman is a prolific Tory donor to the tune of £400 grand who also helped Boris Johnson secure an £800 000 loan. Those are just facts; whether they had any influence on the decision to suspend him is down to personal opinion.

    Of course they did. 😁
    Can't be true the BBC is impartial don't ya know!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    25,047
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippity View Post
    Well, it's quite clear. The pressure predominantly came from the right wing press and from Tory MPs. Zero pressure would have been the result of a pro-Gov't tweet.

    The Director General is a former prospective Tory MP and the chairman is a prolific Tory donor to the tune of £400 grand who also helped Boris Johnson secure an £800 000 loan. Those are just facts; whether they had any influence on the decision to suspend him is down to personal opinion.


    Of course they did. ��

    It's not generally known, but it should be well known, that the word "Tory" is an Anglicisation of a Gaelic Irish word, Toiraidh which actually interprets as "outlaw or robber on the run"

    Now there's food for thought as this lot in power are certainly living up to the truth.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    11,061
    actually Kuenssberg (who i don't like) has been accused of bais against Corbyn in the past but in the last few years has "appeared" to be anti tories nothing like being balanced lol

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    25,047
    Quote Originally Posted by ronandtet View Post
    actually Kuenssberg (who i don't like) has been accused of bais against Corbyn in the past but in the last few years has "appeared" to be anti tories nothing like being balanced lol
    As BBC political editor, Laura Kuenssberg has a duty to stay impartial, with anything that is considered less than impartial, becoming problematic for the publicly-funded broadcaster.

    Luckily for the BBC, Kuenssberg has stressed she would ‘die for impartiality‘. Nonetheless, all sides of the political aisle have taken their turns complaining about Kuenssberg’s coverage.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    3,875

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    25,047
    Quote Originally Posted by Kal View Post
    Yes, a very sad time in this country's history but largely brought about by dictator Saddam Hussein's claim, even when on the way to the gallows, that he had weapons of mass desruction hidden away and was prepared to use them.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •