oh dear no, doesn't sound daft at all - BT....see Williams in a Wimbledon final - first set, destroys the opponent, second set, contendor makes a phenomenal recovery and takes it..."Seems like we're in for a nailbiting third set viewers", well, not really, Williams just turns up the power to first set level, and walks it home. Why?... because they can, they have the ability to "influence".....manipulate the game, and with it the atmosphere, more fun for them than repeatedly smacking the ball around.
or.....there's the Peter Principle.
"The Peter Principle is an observation that the tendency in most organizational hierarchies, such as that of a corporation, is for every employee to rise in the hierarchy through promotion until they reach a level of respective incompetence"
Principally - promote to fail....the weak point in the chain causing a heavier load on others, so becoming a shield to defend/assist the higher echelons grip on power.
or.... much like a large corporation, who'll recruit (ego's) young willing workers direct from Uni/Academy...and depending on the crisp to be browned, the level of secrecy etc, perhaps a little psychologically profiling even - just to see how far they're willing to play before (if ever) their sense of right and wrong comes knocking... .
In this case, the above could all be crap, but that would mean he's crap.....which returns us to the "Question", and the plausible answers, above.
I watched Burnley and Fulham implode and have to wonder why.
It made my day too sinky, especially as they were 2-1 up with 10 mins to go. Added to which the Blades now have a distraction from the league, an extra game to play and hopefully will be taken apart like we were by Haaland.
I once watched us implode at hartlepool when inchy lost the plot and even worse at Oxford's old manor ground but as you say BT, not often.
Winning has almost become the norm this season, something we will never have when we return to the Prem ,so embrace defeat as it will soon be the new norm.