+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 22 of 299 FirstFirst ... 1220212223243272122 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 2981

Thread: O/T. The Government's handling of Covid

  1. #211
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    7,553
    Quote Originally Posted by Ram59 View Post
    That's better than your previous working directly for the state. But how would you determine working for the good of society?

    Would you include any of the following, accountants working for health companies, architects for building companies who have built schools, roads, hospitals or even HS2? Or maybe researchers for pharmaceutical companies?

    The list is very long and the idea is unworkable, its not as if these people aren't being paid for what they're doing.
    My answer to that question would be no. Accountants working for health companies, architects for building companies who have built schools, roads, hospitals or even HS2? Or maybe researchers for pharmaceutical companies........... they are all working for companies in the private sector as opposed to in the public sector. They will (or most of them anyway) be better paid than those doing similar jobs in the public sector.

  2. #212
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    13,074
    Quote Originally Posted by Ram59 View Post
    That's better than your previous working directly for the state. But how would you determine working for the good of society?

    Would you include any of the following, accountants working for health companies, architects for building companies who have built schools, roads, hospitals or even HS2? Or maybe researchers for pharmaceutical companies?

    The list is very long and the idea is unworkable, its not as if these people aren't being paid for what they're doing.
    That’s a very fair point, Ram...and the answer is...I don’t know.
    I guess it’s something along the lines of...those who work for pharma companies, or Rolls Royce whatever, are ultimately working for a) the good of themselves and b) the good of the company, whereas those who work for the NHS or state schools are working for a) the good of themselves and b) the good of the country.
    One of my best friends spent his whole working life with Rolls Royce. He and I both did relatively well, were paid much the same and have similar pensions, but he also benefited from the ability to buy employee based shares in the company.
    I don’t resent that for one second...and as things stand at this precise moment they haven’t done him much good...but I do wonder if, nowadays, those who enter the national health or education professions, for example, should have the opportunity to be rewarded in a similar way with, again for example, the payback of a percentage of tuition fees for every ten years of ‘service’.

  3. #213
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    6,595
    If we accept the difference between working for the good of society, rather than working for the state, we may have some greater consensus rA. For example working for a state owned armaments company might not be working for the good of society....

    It all just comes back to another way to look at the pay disparity between the public and private sector. This has always existed and has been debated for years. The private sector may pay more, but that employment carries greater risk of job insecurity. That's what makes the difference in pay as far as I see it. The private sector don't pay more than the public out of any sense of generosity, they are there to make profits: governments arguably arent. The private sector pay more to get the best quality employees.

    So are you saying we should reward someone who the private sector don't want to headhunt because they have been loyal to the state system? Have they been loyal, or just not good enough to be recruited away?

    Its a trade off in the way people are rewarded. I don't see the "inherent virtue" in working in the public sector, its a job. If you don't like it, don't do it. The job market is about open competition, not assigning degrees of righteousness to certain roles. If that were the case, office cleaners might get paid more than high court judges.

    But to contextualise this in a covid environment, if I were looking for a job right now, I'd prioritise long term job security over short term higher reward. Those public sector jobs seem a way better option because of the financial risk of an employer going tits up - so no need to bribe people to take them. People will be ripping hands off to get them pretty soon

  4. #214
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,423
    Hands up, who has downloaded the Covid-19 app.

    If you haven't, are you going to, but if not why not?

    I have Btw.

  5. #215
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    13,074
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
    If we accept the difference between working for the good of society, rather than working for the state, we may have some greater consensus rA. For example working for a state owned armaments company might not be working for the good of society....

    It all just comes back to another way to look at the pay disparity between the public and private sector. This has always existed and has been debated for years. The private sector may pay more, but that employment carries greater risk of job insecurity. That's what makes the difference in pay as far as I see it. The private sector don't pay more than the public out of any sense of generosity, they are there to make profits: governments arguably arent. The private sector pay more to get the best quality employees.

    So are you saying we should reward someone who the private sector don't want to headhunt because they have been loyal to the state system? Have they been loyal, or just not good enough to be recruited away?

    Its a trade off in the way people are rewarded. I don't see the "inherent virtue" in working in the public sector, its a job. If you don't like it, don't do it. The job market is about open competition, not assigning degrees of righteousness to certain roles. If that were the case, office cleaners might get paid more than high court judges.

    But to contextualise this in a covid environment, if I were looking for a job right now, I'd prioritise long term job security over short term higher reward. Those public sector jobs seem a way better option because of the financial risk of an employer going tits up - so no need to bribe people to take them. People will be ripping hands off to get them pretty soon
    Some fair points and it’s complex.
    I’m not actually ‘assigning degrees of righteousness to certain roles’ and I would very much question your assumption that the private sector attracts the ‘best quality employees’.
    There are many examples of industry providing support in the form of paying for tuition fees...maybe something similar needs to be put in place for those who commit to the public sector too. That’s all.

  6. #216
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    6,595
    Id suggest that the private sector tries to attract better quality staff via higher pay - I would agree they don't always get that decision right!

    yes private sector often assists employees with educational costs - eg accountants, architects and law firms with their staff professional examinations. I was beneficiary of that in my early post university working life - but it came at a cost: virtual slave labour. It was but a few years prior to my first job when trainee accountants didn't get paid at all in exchange for such benefits - and not long before then you used to have to pay to be employed and trained.

  7. #217
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    7,254
    Quote Originally Posted by Ram59 View Post
    Hands up, who has downloaded the Covid-19 app.

    If you haven't, are you going to, but if not why not?

    I have Btw.
    I won't be doing.

    My phone was trying to pair with a neighbour (who had his hotspot on) all day today but it won't pair with my car even when I'm in it.

    I'm compliant with other HMG rules/laws including 2X2 week self isolations so far and would download it if it became law but don't trust bluetooth technology I'm afraid

  8. #218
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    13,074
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_Faber View Post
    I won't be doing.

    My phone was trying to pair with a neighbour (who had his hotspot on) all day today but it won't pair with my car even when I'm in it.

    I'm compliant with other HMG rules/laws including 2X2 week self isolations so far and would download it if it became law but don't trust bluetooth technology I'm afraid
    That might be you Andy...mine pairs perfectly with my car, two sound docks in the house and any rental car...and I’m a technological f***wit.
    Having said that, I downloaded the Covid App today and it tells me the risk in my postcode is ‘MEDIUM’....but I’m 1800 miles away from my postcode and all I get is an expanding green circle telling me my app is ‘active and scanning’.
    Think I might have broken the system...Ram59...please advise.
    Last edited by ramAnag; 24-09-2020 at 09:01 PM.

  9. #219
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    6,595
    I downloaded it and it's doing the same for me rA

  10. #220
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    7,254
    Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
    That might be you Andy...mine pairs perfectly with my car, two sound docks in the house and any rental car...and I’m a technological f***wit.
    Having said that, I downloaded the Covid App today and it tells me the risk in my postcode is ‘MEDIUM’....but I’m 1800 miles away from my postcode and all I get is an expanding green circle telling me my app is ‘active and scanning’.
    Think I might have broken the system...Ram59...please advise.
    The car thing might be me (or the car), still not keen to be an early adopter.

    On a more public-spirited level, and looking at economic impact rather than health, I'm considering 'sponsoring' a musician I know who is on his uppers

Page 22 of 299 FirstFirst ... 1220212223243272122 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •