+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Nards staying with Shakers

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    37,186

    Nards staying with Shakers

    Daniel Nardiello will remain with Bury for the rest of the season after extending his loan spell. - view external link

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,319

    re: Nards staying with Shakers

    I don't get all these extended loans, Nards, Noble, Odejayi, Ainsworth... especially when Evans has made it clear they're no longer in the Millers plans. It must be down to finance i.e. they earn more being contracted to Rotherham United than they would being contracted to another club. But if they're costing us money and not wanted who is accountable? Somebody should be taking responsibility, either it's poor financial management, poor contractual management or poor initial player selection.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    4

    re: Nards staying with Shakers

    Or, if its the case that we are receiving more from these clubs than we are paying the players, its very good business.

    Incidentally, I'm not using my normal sign-in details because not only has Millers Mad lost them, but it won't let me re-register with them. Millers Mad seems to be particularly welld right now. I wonder how many former postees are similarly trapped in this state of purgatory.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,286

    re: Nards staying with Shakers

    Quote Originally Posted by leedsmiller
    I don't get all these extended loans, Nards, Noble, Odejayi, Ainsworth... especially when Evans has made it clear they're no longer in the Millers plans. It must be down to finance i.e. they earn more being contracted to Rotherham United than they would being contracted to another club. But if they're costing us money and not wanted who is accountable? Somebody should be taking responsibility, either it's poor financial management, poor contractual management or poor initial player selection.
    I agree with you with players who haven't really been part of the first team, but Nardiello did a great job for us. If Bury have taken over his wages and it allows us to look for a better replacement, then all is good. It may be that six out allows three better players in.

    I would hope, however, that he is telling potential new signings that the previous recruitment policy was intended to get us out of L2, and now we're in L1 we are more

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,749

    re: Nards staying with Shakers

    Is it a contract thing? Loan them now, pay their wages and not incur a transfer fee when they move permanently?

    No issue if so. Otherwise it would mean they'd be back with us and we'd pay their wages until the end of the season thus wiping out any possible profit from a fee.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •