Tweet
Originally posted by donsdaft
View Post
-
Eh? -
You brought religion into it.
I agree, we would be better off without it.Comment
-
Well, yes.
But the broader point, regarding her specifically, is that a lot of the looney fringe view her mob espouse are viewed as acceptable in some "socially conservative" circles.
I'd hope, were a Forbes leadership to come to pass, this nonsense would be reigned in.
I'd similarly hope, and I'd also think it more likely, that if the current incumbent FM tried to introduce, say, Sharia Law, the checks and balances would kick in.Comment
-
Weirdo middle eastern religions, the pair of them.
However, if you run a party looking for votes, you don't choose the religion deemed to be foreign.
That's not taking into account his appalling weegieness, which may well turn out to be the biggest factor.Comment
-
Just a small point of order. He didn’t choose his religion, she didComment
-
-
BollöcksOriginally posted by Mason89 View Post
Religion is something you can be born into, but it's easy enough to leave.
You don't actually have to practice it.Comment
-
That’s not what I’m sayingComment
-
I've never any idea what you're saying.Comment
-
The fact remains that the SNP chose a leader which a huge part of Scotland will have difficulty voting for.
Not a sensible move, however you look at it.Comment
-
-
Twenty-six bishops and archbishops of the English church get to tell Scotland how it's to be run.
I didn't even get an opportunity to tell them to fμck off.Comment
-
Perhaps if you used words in any sort of order it would help.Originally posted by Mason89 View PostComment
-
-
You don't try it very often.
Just a thought.
If the leader of the SNP came from Glasgow's sizeable Jewish community, do you still think there would be a problem?Comment
Comment