Originally posted by Jupiter
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
General News Chat
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by 57vintage View PostYou mean he gets to keep Cummings, who everyone suddenly trusts as the paragon of truth? They’re all ****ing lying, the filth. It’s what they do. ****ing filth.
Edit: Apologies. I read that as “walloper”.
An obnoxious individual indeed.
He hardly said anything surprising though did he?
Boris wouldn’t know the truth if it bit his arse and Hancock is as useless an individual as you can imagine.
There’s a rule of thumb here.
The bigger the union jack’s they’re standing in front of = the bigger lie they’re telling.
Comment
-
You’re trying to rewrite history here. The bold claims were that wee Niccy would never shut down Glasgow, like she did to the NE. Possibly on account of her haircut or teuchters wearing suits. Regardless, that has proved to be absolute sh1te - which was pointed out at the time.Originally posted by sonofrgmsdad View Post


Glasgow = 144 cases / 100,000 population
Aberdeen = 10 cases / 100,000 population
You were wrong first time round, you're wrong this time round.
There’s no shame in saying you were wrong. It’s a dying art these days
Comment
-
Looks like Tims that marry non Tims aren’t married at all.
I’m sure this will affect some of you and basically I don’t give a f’uck.
Looks like God voted for Boris though.
Probably a brexiteer as well.
Another reason to hate the b’astard.
Comment
-
Today's Guardian letters includes:
"On Saturday, you published a photo of the UK prime minister above the headline “A dangerous cult now runs Britain” (Journal, 29 May). I was pleased to see that, despite the constant turmoil of the modern world, some things, such as the Guardian’s famed penchant for typos, never change.
Tony Mabbott
Rotherham, South Yorkshire"
And now over to Sean for tomorrow's weather.
Comment
-
You know very well that the argument was that Aberdeen was subject to a set of rules, Glasgow were subject to a different set of rules and that no explanation was given for why.Originally posted by Mason89 View PostYou’re trying to rewrite history here. The bold claims were that wee Niccy would never shut down Glasgow, like she did to the NE. Possibly on account of her haircut or teuchters wearing suits. Regardless, that has proved to be absolute sh1te - which was pointed out at the time.
There’s no shame in saying you were wrong. It’s a dying art these days
Comment
-
An explanation was given but it was drowned out in all the cries of weegie bias, which I’m sure even you can admit now, were sh1teOriginally posted by sonofrgmsdad View PostYou know very well that the argument was that Aberdeen was subject to a set of rules, Glasgow were subject to a different set of rules and that no explanation was given for why.
Comment

Comment