Originally posted by WhenTattieFlooredChas
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Keir Starmer
Collapse
X
-
I fancy we may have different definitions of "good" and "bad" when it comes to socio-economic and socio-political societal models.Originally posted by Jupiter View PostDo you want a bet?
I'm fond of fair and equitable taxation, direct taxation, with investment in key public services and regulation of "the markets".
I'd guess you're fond of reactionary, populist tabloid headlines?
Or a meringue?
Comment
-
Some argue though that the State is already bloated and unproductive and that increases in taxation often result in reduced tax receipts. I’m inclined to the view that the Public Sector is often inefficient and that it generally doesn’t offer the taxpayer value for money … walk into any Council office or, dare I say it, the NHS and observe, critically, just how many front-line staff there are doing absolutely ***** all!Originally posted by InversneckieDob View PostI fancy we may have different definitions of "good" and "bad" when it comes to socio-economic and socio-political societal models.
I'm fond of fair and equitable taxation, direct taxation, with investment in key public services and regulation of "the markets".
I'd guess you're fond of reactionary, populist tabloid headlines?
Or a meringue?
Comment
-
A lot of bell-cow innacuracies in play in that post.Originally posted by Shetland Don View PostSome argue though that the State is already bloated and unproductive and that increases in taxation often result in reduced tax receipts. I’m inclined to the view that the Public Sector is often inefficient and that it generally doesn’t offer the taxpayer value for money … walk into any Council office or, dare I say it, the NHS and observe, critically, just how many front-line staff there are doing absolutely ***** all!
The factual position is that, at front line, service provision level, public services are grossly underfunded.
The inefficiencies are much higher up the food chain.
The problems, in the short term, date back to the Major government's fragmentation of the broader public service into "Executive agencies" and such like (done with a view to privitisation and greater private sector involvement), run by boards and executives with a "style over substance" ethos.
Because successive Governments for the last fifty odd years have been hostile to the very concept of public service, there has been zero longterm, strategic planning and investment.
This has led to the current issues within public service.
Until a longterm cultural ethos is adopted, putting frontline service top of the aspirational pile, we'll never progress.
Greater private sector involvement doesn't work (see the utilities and public transport) and Governments remain hostile to them conceptually.
Comment
-
That's a tad harsh.Originally posted by WhenTattieFlooredChas View PostYes true, but doesn't change the fact that because someone receives an honour for their achievements it doesn't make them an elitist c**t.
I'd suggest more a two-faced tw@t who doesn't know irony when it slaps him in the face.
Comment
-
You really have next to no idea on this.Originally posted by Shetland Don View PostI’m inclined to the view that the Public Sector is often inefficient and that it generally doesn’t offer the taxpayer value for money … walk into any Council office or, dare I say it, the NHS and observe, critically, just how many front-line staff there are doing absolutely ***** all!
Comment
-
And I thought it was just your 32” circumference bell-bottoms that gave away your obsession with the early 1970s.Originally posted by donsdaft View PostI see there are no shortage of cooncil employees ( I won't say workers) on here.
Unsurprising really given how there are three employees for every job available.
Comment
-
“The factual position is that …”, debate over.Originally posted by InversneckieDob View PostA lot of bell-cow innacuracies in play in that post.
The factual position is that, at front line, service provision level, public services are grossly underfunded.
The inefficiencies are much higher up the food chain.
The problems, in the short term, date back to the Major government's fragmentation of the broader public service into "Executive agencies" and such like (done with a view to privitisation and greater private sector involvement), run by boards and executives with a "style over substance" ethos.
Because successive Governments for the last fifty odd years have been hostile to the very concept of public service, there has been zero longterm, strategic planning and investment.
This has led to the current issues within public service.
Until a longterm cultural ethos is adopted, putting frontline service top of the aspirational pile, we'll never progress.
Greater private sector involvement doesn't work (see the utilities and public transport) and Governments remain hostile to them conceptually.
Comment

Comment