They had the chance to win the game, but didn't take it. That's fitba.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rangers Then, Sevco Now, Scotland's Shame Forever....
Collapse
X
-
You can?t entertain the c*nts at all on the subject of penalties. Last season I had a horde of them at work telling me at great length on how you can?t tug a shirt in the box these days as it?s a penalty every time
Fast forward a few weeks and the same mutants were telling me it?s ok to tug a shirt in the box under certain circumstances
If the honky smelly inbred sister sh@gging w@nkers knew anything about football they wouldn?t support the Huns in the first place. You?re farting in the wind talking football with them
Comment
-
Some Hun zoomer on twitter claiming that if you add all the trophies the dead club and their tribute act 'won' and add all the Glasgow Cups, Tennents Sixes and other such shyte, they blow Celtic out the water in the trophy haul.

Their lack of self awareness really is stunning.
Comment
-
Can someone explain the rules to me?
I would normally assume there is a different set for the hun but the explanation of why VAR was wrong in not awarding a penalty came from Willie Collum. He claimed that Scales had grabbed the Rangers player outside the box but had continued to hold him while said hun’s foot was on the line of the penalty box.
Why is that deemed ‘inside the box’. A ball is out of play only if it has completely crossed a boundary line; it is only a goal if the ball is completely over the goal line. Why is ‘on the line’ of the penalty box then considered inside?
Comment
-
Aye ... add tae that, if said hun had one foot on the line, Scales' hand and 'secured' portion of hun's shirt would be outside the penalty area. So the actual offense could nae be determined tae be inside the area ... or even on the line. Gollum clutchin' at straws methinks.Originally posted by rustlinsweetiepapers View PostCan someone explain the rules to me?
I would normally assume there is a different set for the hun but the explanation of why VAR was wrong in not awarding a penalty came from Willie Collum. He claimed that Scales had grabbed the Rangers player outside the box but had continued to hold him while said hun’s foot was on the line of the penalty box.
Why is that deemed ‘inside the box’. A ball is out of play only if it has completely crossed a boundary line; it is only a goal if the ball is completely over the goal line. Why is ‘on the line’ of the penalty box then considered inside?
Comment
-
How dare Dundee try and stop Rangers.“It’s about breaking open the (Dundee) wall,” said the Rangers manager on BBC Scotland. “It’s a challenge against Dundee for every team. They use every trick in the book – and sometimes outside the book – to stop you.”
Clement seemed quite sane when he first came in but he quickly lapped up the hun kool-aid and has been infected with their superiority guff.
Boys a prize pillock.
Comment
-
To be fair to Gollum, reluctantly, I think he made clear that the placing of the foot was a red herring, it was where the shirt was being held that mattered. And by all accounts that continued into the box. Personally I love the fact that it seems it should have been a penalty. Just more fuel for their ridiculous narrative.
Comment
-
Life's us far too short to try and keep up with the ever evolving rule changeds to our game, but if the initial foul is outside the box then shouldn't it be a free kick?Originally posted by Don Julio View PostTo be fair to Gollum, reluctantly, I think he made clear that the placing of the foot was a red herring, it was where the shirt was being held that mattered. And by all accounts that continued into the box. Personally I love the fact that it seems it should have been a penalty. Just more fuel for their ridiculous narrative.
I'm nae fussed and don't overly concern myself with the rules, but listening to them it's like they are the only ones who lose out in these decisions.
Comment
-
The Press, as many will have seen, is full of reports that Rang*** were throwing their money around at Ibrox yesterday and that some Septic players were hit with missiles. I simply can’t believe the first bit and if there is any truth in the second part then I sincerely hope that they were ballistic.
Comment
-
Couldn't agree more. At one point in his rant he said that every sevco team should be coming to Dundee and wiping the floor with Dundee. What an arrogant cnut. And they wonder why everyone in Scotland hates them?Originally posted by TheDeeDon View PostKris Boyds meltdowns after another sh*t performance by the tribute act are sheer joy.
The sense of entitlement is breathtaking.
Long may both his and his clubs misery continue.
Comment
-
I quite like it. In the end, it?s their sense of entitlement that provides the laughs & itll be what kills them in the end (again)Originally posted by Red Zone View PostCouldn't agree more. At one point in his rant he said that every sevco team should be coming to Dundee and wiping the floor with Dundee. What an arrogant cnut. And they wonder why everyone in Scotland hates them?
Comment
-
Excellent stuff, should help ensure a really toxic atmosphere should St Perth score first tomorrow although I suspect there will be a large number of blue seats in attendance tomorrowOriginally posted by Mason89 View PostSpeaking of which, check out the latest Union Bears statement if you want a giggle
Comment

Comment