Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

V Brentford

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • V Brentford

    Good to see that Walker is relegated to the bench, with Worral, Hannibal and Ward-Prowse all starting. Perplexingly Fleming being played as the striker and TBL starting. I live in hope.

  • #2
    Come back Walker..😁

    Comment


    • #3
      This is disgusting.. 🫩

      Comment


      • #4
        Bad chest didn't bother today, thank god.

        3 down and the fella on RL says that the players aren't trying and don't look interested, and the atmosphere is toxic

        What does it take for Parker to get sacked, this can not continue into next season

        Comment


        • #5
          Ridiculous starting line up and SP deserves whatever shiiiit comes his way. No idea what’s going to happen second half

          Comment


          • #6
            Who is supposed to set up the defence at set pieces? What is wrong with having a defender inside each post?

            Comment


            • #7
              Don't believe it 3 each. We can win this now

              Comment


              • #8
                Football with VAR has become a sick joke.2 goals chalked off for no reason whatsoever.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ClaretinBudapest View Post
                  Football with VAR has become a sick joke.2 goals chalked off for no reason whatsoever.
                  Awful decisions ,complete and utter rubbish is VAR

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I thought that VAR was for ? clear and obvious ? on field errors. How could either be ? clear and obvious ?, especially the second goal. VAR took 5 minutes to decide that it was ? clear and obvious ?.

                    Can anybody explain why VAR takes 5 minutes and the ref then plays 30 seconds after it? Does time wasted on VAR not count?

                    I thought that we were a different team in the second half. Chris Iwelumo suggested that Lewis meant that Hannibal was freed up to influence the game, which he did.

                    As regards SP, Flemming was struggling in the 79th minute. SP reacts in the 90th minute. WTF.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Swissclaret View Post
                      I thought that VAR was for ? clear and obvious ? on field errors. How could either be ? clear and obvious ?, especially the second goal. VAR took 5 minutes to decide that it was ? clear and obvious ?.

                      Can anybody explain why VAR takes 5 minutes and the ref then plays 30 seconds after it? Does time wasted on VAR not count?

                      I thought that we were a different team in the second half. Chris Iwelumo suggested that Lewis meant that Hannibal was freed up to influence the game, which he did.

                      As regards SP, Flemming was struggling in the 79th minute. SP reacts in the 90th minute. WTF.
                      I think we can clearly see Swiss that this relegation is down to SP.Playing not to lose instead of playing to win will never keep you in the PL.We have only started playing half decent when we go behind or when we need wins and draws are not enough.The players were good enough to play better than they have done under Parker.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Today's defeat was soly on Parker setting up with a flat back 5, the most negative formation in football.

                        American owners haven't got a scoobydo. Yanks no phuck all about football

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by ClaretinBudapest View Post
                          I think we can clearly see Swiss that this relegation is down to SP.Playing not to lose instead of playing to win will never keep you in the PL.We have only started playing half decent when we go behind or when we need wins and draws are not enough.The players were good enough to play better than they have done under Parker.
                          I agree CiB. Again Iwelumo said that he ? loves ? SP but he is too defensive minded. I don’t think that many would disagree with that.

                          For Brentford’s first goal we left 5 Brentford players unmarked, defending on a zonal basis. For their fourth goal we awarded them the freedom of the Turf. Part of the problem is inconsistent performances. SP needs to get on the backs of some of the players. They can’t have a good week and then next week they look like League 1 players.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by ballcock View Post
                            Today's defeat was soly on Parker setting up with a flat back 5, the most negative formation in football.

                            American owners haven't got a scoobydo. Yanks no phuck all about football
                            I?m just back and I?m not quite sure what I witnessed really - we look amateur at best like they haven?t played together before and then we look like a team together who in the end were robbed ( that is the truth ).

                            First things first we set up shockingly again ( I?m assuming Edwards is poorly or injured ).

                            How many times does he need to see a 5 at the back ( overlapping wing backs ) who have no pace and can?t get up and down DOESNT WORK for us we don?t have the players to action it.

                            We will not win games giving teams 2-3 start every week.

                            Second half Hannibal ran and controlled the midfield ( he is as I always said our best forward thinking player )

                            Substitutions - not Parker?s strong point either - remove Hannibal who?s bossing midfield shut up shop and accept a draw - invite them onto us and lose the game - his decision making is appalling.

                            Other than that we were robbed again VAR biggest con ever.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by army88 View Post
                              I?m just back and I?m not quite sure what I witnessed really - we look amateur at best like they haven?t played together before and then we look like a team together who in the end were robbed ( that is the truth ).

                              First things first we set up shockingly again ( I?m assuming Edwards is poorly or injured ).

                              How many times does he need to see a 5 at the back ( overlapping wing backs ) who have no pace and can?t get up and down DOESNT WORK for us we don?t have the players to action it.

                              We will not win games giving teams 2-3 start every week.

                              Second half Hannibal ran and controlled the midfield ( he is as I always said our best forward thinking player )

                              Substitutions - not Parker?s strong point either - remove Hannibal who?s bossing midfield shut up shop and accept a draw - invite them onto us and lose the game - his decision making is appalling.

                              Other than that we were robbed again VAR biggest con ever.
                              What was the atmosphere like, army? Were people calling for his head?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X