Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tripps to Wolves

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tripps to Wolves

    Always thought he'd end up back here, but I never thought we'd have Kyle Walker.

  • #2
    Looks like Walker his going to play out his contract. Why wouldn't he though at the age of 37, who else would have him for the money we will be paying him

    Comment


    • #3
      Kyle is obviously happy at Turf Moor and his lad is in our academy, so it seems like a bit of a no-brainer.

      At their prime, who would be the better of the two at right back for Burnley & England.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by The Bedlington Terrier View Post

        At their prime, who would be the better of the two at right back for Burnley & England.
        Not much in it imo, possibly Walker for his extra bit of pace.

        I always thought Tripps suffered having to play under Gareth, who had little interest in utilising his outstanding crossing ability and even played him at left-back FFS.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by sinkov View Post
          Not much in it imo, possibly Walker for his extra bit of pace.

          I always thought Tripps suffered having to play under Gareth, who had little interest in utilising his outstanding crossing ability and even played him at left-back FFS.
          Can't argue with any of that mon ami.

          Comment


          • #6
            Tripps had/has a magic wand of a right foot nullified by Southgate. Walker doesn’t offer much going forward and should have been the square peg at left back. Never understood that tbh.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by wmdave_b View Post
              Tripps had/has a magic wand of a right foot nullified by Southgate. Walker doesn’t offer much going forward and should have been the square peg at left back. Never understood that tbh.
              Two ways to look at it for me Dave

              Who?s going to play up front for us that would benefit from trips services / delivery.

              If we had a Charlie Austin I may think differently!!

              Walker was nullified by Parker?s negative rubbish under a different manager I reckon walker the better bet - so much as I loved Tripps wolves can have him.

              Comment


              • #8
                Don't want Trippier back. We'll past his best,Walker is the better player .

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by army88 View Post
                  Two ways to look at it for me Dave

                  Who?s going to play up front for us that would benefit from trips services / delivery.

                  If we had a Charlie Austin I may think differently!!

                  Walker was nullified by Parker?s negative rubbish under a different manager I reckon walker the better bet - so much as I loved Tripps wolves can have him.
                  Sorry Army, I meant Tripps should have been right back for England and Walker at LB. With Kane up front, made sense to me.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X