Political Thread in memory of David Reid. (R.I.P.)

[ballcock]

The perpetrator who was born in Britain was summarily executed by the GMP without a trial or due process. I have no idea if it?s true or not but it?s being reported here in Spain the GMP killed one of the stabbed victims. Would it be fair to say the rule of law has gone down the crapper?

The GMP where doing their jobs.

This Syrian was a terriost who had a fake bomb strapped to him and carried a knife. It was the duty of the police to take him out, or it could have been a massacre

The safety of this countries citizens is paramount and comes before a terriost or anyone who carries a weapon

On a final note. I thought you where having a 2 week break from politics and that you were no longer prepared to enter any type of discussion with a Gammon

[The Bedlington Terrier]

I can’t take a break from political discourse ballcock, politics are ethereal, here in the everyday all the time. Todos los dias amigo. I’ll bet the two dead Jews wish the GMP knew how to shoot. Shoot to kill policies have never worked in the United Kingdom and they never will, we are not silly bloody gun toting cowboys, we leave that to the Yanks.
Not one death is ever justified I wonder whether the do-gooders will be baying for blood?

[Swissclaret]

They finished him off quite efficiently, if it had been up to me I'd have put half a dozen bullets in his legs then let him bleed to death. Slowly.

Incidentally, he was born in Syria mon ami.

I am with you on that, sinkov.

First name ?Jihad?. A bit of a clue as to the nature of his family.

[sinkov]

Don't Fear The Donald.

For my good friend BT.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgTJUQ-Dddo

[The Bedlington Terrier]

I’m sorry for the scepticism but I think this Peace Plan will just end up giving Israel the whole of Palestine with horrendous consequences for the Palestinians.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

I’m reading a few UK media sources and cannot help but wonder exactly what do our Counter Terrorism agencies actually do?

[The Bedlington Terrier]

They finished him off quite efficiently, if it had been up to me I'd have put half a dozen bullets in his legs then let him bleed to death. Slowly.

Incidentally, he was born in Syria mon ami.

Not true mon ami he was born in Prestwich, his dad is a trauma surgeon. Like ballcock says he was under investigation for an alleged rape. Seems like the Gaza situation has tipped him over the edge. It?s a pity he was killed before his exact motives for this heinous act was discovered.

[sinkov]

According to your bible mon ami, he was born in Syria.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...il-for-alleged

[sinkov]

I’m sorry for the scepticism but I think this Peace Plan will just end up giving Israel the whole of Palestine with horrendous consequences for the Palestinians.

I'm with you on the scepticism mon ami, but for different reasons. Hamas are, as usual, taking the piss, playing for time, they have no intention of accepting the parts of the plan they don't like, such as giving up their weapons. They are happy enough to release the sausages, as long as they can see their way to remaining armed and involved somehow in Gaza's future. They'll drag it all out for as long as they can and hope to sow that much confusion amidst the hope that they can survive.

They have no interest whatsoever in 'peace'.

[sinkov]

Don't Fear The Donald.

For my good friend BT.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgTJUQ-Dddo

Well, what do you think mon ami, they should get Trump's team working on our welcome videos, or perhaps one for Mike Tresor. He's about as much use to us as the Dems are for America.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Honestly mon ami I’m giving up all hope for mankind

[sinkov]

The Great Net Zero Scam, Met Office making it up as it goes along.

"Last August, the Daily Sceptic drew attention to the UK Met Office inventing temperature data at its fictitious ‘open’ weather station at Lowestoft. Figures were said to be compiled from “well-correlated neighbouring stations”, but research by citizen sleuth Ray Sanders found there were no such operations within a 40-mile radius. At the time, the Daily Sceptic referred to the matter as a “smoking gun” and said that unless the Met Office could finally reveal its workings out, “the only realistic conclusion to draw is that the data are invented”. No explanation has been provided but in a shock unannounced move the Met Office has now withdrawn all the Lowestoft data from its historical record back to when the site closed in 2010. Similar withdrawals of data have also occurred in the stations at Nairm Druim and Paisley. The move casts serious doubt over attempts by the Met Office to estimate temperature trends across many once open but now closed weather stations. Sanders is not inclined to minimise the scale of the problem facing the Met Office. When subject to “proper scrutiny”, the Met Office “could not substantiate its fabrication of false data and has had to delete them in their entirety”. The practice of inventing temperature data from non-existent stations is not confined to the UK. In the USA, the weather service NOAA has been charged with fabricating data from more than 30% of its reporting sites. Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting averages are given an ‘E’ for estimate. The addition of the so-called ‘ghost’ station data means NOAA’s monthly and yearly reports are “not representative of reality”, states meteorologist Anthony Watts. If such evidence was presented in a court of law it would be thrown out, he adds. Temperature measurements and estimates are a highly imprecise science. The dreadful mistake meteorological operations like the Met Office and NOAA make is to leverage their ‘trusted’ status to promote the political Net Zero fantasy by claiming an accuracy and precision that is simply not available in their rough-and-ready figures. The problem with Lowestoft is that the Met Office has been unable to back up its widely promoted “well-correlated stations” explanation. The four nearby stations to Lowestoft supplied in a Met Office public domain database are all, alas, closed. Sanders dug further and found that the only open well-correlated sites available were Cromer, a Class 4 junk site with possible unnatural errors up to 2?C at 35 miles distance, and Class 2 Weybourne, 41 miles away. Well-correlated except for the fact they are too far away to provide a monthly estimate for Lowestoft to one tenth of a degree centigrade. For its part, the Met Office refuses to name well-correlated stations for any of its calculations, claiming “it is not retained information”. Sanders has expressed incredulity at this explanation, exclaiming: “What, not ever, not even for one day? Hands up anyone who believes that!” Freedom of Information requests to obtain station names have been met with the Met Officer stating that such attempts are “vexatious” and not in the public interest."

Doesn't seem to matter what the subject, those in charge treat us like we're idiots.

[ballcock]

The Great Net Zero Scam, Met Office making it up as it goes along.

"Last August, the Daily Sceptic drew attention to the UK Met Office inventing temperature data at its fictitious ‘open’ weather station at Lowestoft. Figures were said to be compiled from “well-correlated neighbouring stations”, but research by citizen sleuth Ray Sanders found there were no such operations within a 40-mile radius. At the time, the Daily Sceptic referred to the matter as a “smoking gun” and said that unless the Met Office could finally reveal its workings out, “the only realistic conclusion to draw is that the data are invented”. No explanation has been provided but in a shock unannounced move the Met Office has now withdrawn all the Lowestoft data from its historical record back to when the site closed in 2010. Similar withdrawals of data have also occurred in the stations at Nairm Druim and Paisley. The move casts serious doubt over attempts by the Met Office to estimate temperature trends across many once open but now closed weather stations. Sanders is not inclined to minimise the scale of the problem facing the Met Office. When subject to “proper scrutiny”, the Met Office “could not substantiate its fabrication of false data and has had to delete them in their entirety”. The practice of inventing temperature data from non-existent stations is not confined to the UK. In the USA, the weather service NOAA has been charged with fabricating data from more than 30% of its reporting sites. Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting averages are given an ‘E’ for estimate. The addition of the so-called ‘ghost’ station data means NOAA’s monthly and yearly reports are “not representative of reality”, states meteorologist Anthony Watts. If such evidence was presented in a court of law it would be thrown out, he adds. Temperature measurements and estimates are a highly imprecise science. The dreadful mistake meteorological operations like the Met Office and NOAA make is to leverage their ‘trusted’ status to promote the political Net Zero fantasy by claiming an accuracy and precision that is simply not available in their rough-and-ready figures. The problem with Lowestoft is that the Met Office has been unable to back up its widely promoted “well-correlated stations” explanation. The four nearby stations to Lowestoft supplied in a Met Office public domain database are all, alas, closed. Sanders dug further and found that the only open well-correlated sites available were Cromer, a Class 4 junk site with possible unnatural errors up to 2?C at 35 miles distance, and Class 2 Weybourne, 41 miles away. Well-correlated except for the fact they are too far away to provide a monthly estimate for Lowestoft to one tenth of a degree centigrade. For its part, the Met Office refuses to name well-correlated stations for any of its calculations, claiming “it is not retained information”. Sanders has expressed incredulity at this explanation, exclaiming: “What, not ever, not even for one day? Hands up anyone who believes that!” Freedom of Information requests to obtain station names have been met with the Met Officer stating that such attempts are “vexatious” and not in the public interest."

Doesn't seem to matter what the subject, those in charge treat us like we're idiots.

Net Zero and Immigration is ruining this country.
It will be the death knell of this Labour government

[The Bedlington Terrier]

My constant refrain to Mrs BT is that next time I’m coming back as a meteorologist, it’s the only job I know that offers ?100k salaried positions and it matters not a jot how accurate the predictions are. The BBC weather site tells us on a daily basis what weather to expect in Bolton and 90% of the time it’s wrong. ��

[sinkov]

The BBC has been telling all who would listen that this summer has been the hottest on record. Well my memory of summers goes back a long way to the 1950s, and I don't need any data, fabricated or not, to say 'Oh no it wasn't, not even close', if you believe that you'll believe anything.

Lying b@stards.