Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Election Year or Fear!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by ramAnag View Post


    I probably know more about it from both sides but we’ll let that one go for the moment.

    I said a couple of weeks ago that, having had cause to visit a very prestigious local Independent School recently, I was mightily impressed by the facilities on offer and while my motivation wasn’t jealousy, my aspiration was ultimately for all children to have access to such facilities in the same way that, ideally, I want all people to have access to the same quality of cancer treatment/care as the King and his daughter in law.

    Given the existing mindset you’re right…that doesn’t seem possible, but the imbalance has, imo, got to begin to be addressed. Why do people send their children to fee paying independent schools? Because they are all too often dissatisfied with the facilities/resources on offer at the state equivalent. Yet, at this moment in time, such an alternative is only available to somewhere between 5-7% of all pupils.

    So well in excess of 90% of our children are receiving a relatively sub standard education.

    MA asks who is in favour of charging VAT on school fees, possibly as one of the means of addressing the balance.

    On the basis that choosing to attend an Independent school is a luxury that relatively few can afford I would come down on the side of being in favour of such taxation.

    Then again, on the basis that those who are paying for fee paying schooling are actually reducing the burden on the taxpayer already by removing their children from the system to have them educated - at their own expense - elsewhere…I can see how they would feel unfairly done to.

    But then (then) again. Q. Where do the teachers who work in the Independent sector come from? A. They come from the state, because, as far as I know, there are no Independent training colleges or Universities set up to provide the teaching resources explicitly for Independent schools …so they are ‘poached’ /cherry picked from the state.

    Of course many young teachers will look at the endless playing fields, beautifully resourced IT suites, school’s own theatre facilities, magnificent science labs etc and think…I’ll have some of that. So three years of partially state funded training (in my day four years on a degree course) goes straight to the independent sector.

    Can that be right? I don’t think so and while I’m willing to be swayed either way on the VAT issue…as far as funding future teachers (and doctors and nurses) is concerned I’d make all the qualification costs entirely free on the condition that those who qualified then served a period of at least ten years working within state schools (or the NHS - please delete accordingly). Should they then wish to transfer to either the private health or education sector within that ten year period I’d then make either them, or their new employers, liable for the cost of all the training which enabled their initial qualification.

    It might all go some way to restoring a more equitable balance.
    Thanks, but wrong on one point, fee paying schools are only USED by 7% of children, they are AVAILABLE to many more, no idea of the percentage but it’s significant. You paint it like an elite privilige and in no way is it (just), I know of many folk far from ‘the elite’ who’ve made financial sacrifices elsewhere in their lives for the sake of their children. Not ignoring the genuinely poor in saying this

    Note that the VAT thing is IMO just spite from Labour, it puts exceptional education out of reach of the normal family who just make ends meet to pay fees, it will have no impact on your ‘elite’ who will just lose the 20% in the rounding. And the IFS who you seem to trust have confirmed it will raise bugger all in absolute terms

    Comment


    • Originally posted by MadAmster View Post
      On the subject of private schools, who is for, and who is against, charging VAT on private school fees?

      It's an option people with enough money can choose. Yes, there are some middle income families that scrimp and scrape in order to be able to pay the fees for their offspring but the vast majority of pupils at these schools come from the richer households. Should they be exempt from VAT?
      IMO no because it feels like a spiteful tax aimed at the votes of spiteful people, it won’t raise enough to make the difference labour are intimating and it will have less and less effect the more ‘elite’ the fee paying family, so ironically it’s a tax on the (relatively) poor

      Comment


      • ‘Spiteful tax’ and ‘spiteful people’ seems more than a little harsh to me, AF, although I can see both sides of the argument.
        It may also, imo, be a tad naive of you to criticise me ‘painting it as an elite privilege’. I’m sure there are a minority of less well healed people in Independent schools, in fact I know there are…however they are likely to have won scholarships which will cover many of the fees and, generally speaking, Independent/Public schools are establishments that cater for the better off 5 ‘ish’ % as the fact that, I think, 27 of our 56 Prime Ministers have come from just two such schools - Eton and Harrow (with 20 coming from the former alone) would indicate.
        Last edited by ramAnag; 24-06-2024, 06:13 PM.

        Comment


        • ‘Spiteful tax’ and ‘spiteful people’ seems more than a little harsh to me, AF, although I can see both sides of the argument.
          It may also, imo, be a tad naive of you to criticise me ‘painting it as an elite privilege’. I’m sure there are a minority of less well healed people in Independent schools, in fact I know there are…however they are likely to have won scholarships which will cover many of the fees and, generally speaking, Independent/Public schools are establishments that cater for the better off 5 ‘ish’ % as the fact that, I think, 27 of our 56 Prime Ministers have come from just two such schools - Eton and Harrow (with 20 coming from the former alone) would indicate.

          P.S. Apologies…no idea why this appears twice.
          Last edited by ramAnag; 24-06-2024, 06:16 PM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by swaledale View Post
            Privately-educated Arron Banks has given millions of pounds to a political party/private company led and owned by privately-educated Nigel Farage, privately-educated Richard Tice and privately-educated Isabel Oakeshott. Because Britain needs an anti-establishment alternative, apparently.
            interesting -

            A 'British' billionaire (£29.7 billion to be precise) who lives in tax exile in Monaco was today urging the British people to vote Labour.
            He has also made friends with Sir Keir Starmer, who he wants to pay millions of tax payers money to fund a new stadium for his new little plaything (Manchester United FC).

            Obviously a working class thing

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Andy_Faber View Post
              No we were both right and I’m not up for another hair splitting ruck so subject closed

              Surely you can’t mean ‘the best’, it just wouldn’t be affordable, and I don’t mean a need to pay fees, I mean staffing and infrastructure. The workforce would need to at least double and that’s just an easy example.

              However as you say you know more about it from the state side than I do so I won’t pretend to be in the know
              Careful, you're bringing up his former profession again, he doesn't like that mentioning and goes ballastic
              Last edited by Trickytreesreds; 24-06-2024, 06:38 PM.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Trickytreesreds View Post
                Careful, you're bringing up his former profession again, he doesn't like that mentioning and goes ballastic
                ‘Ballastic’? Or even ballistic. As if. Sometimes, like now, it’s relevant…sometimes totally not…that’s all. We’ve been talking education a little today…try and keep up. What’s with this ‘working class’ thing you’ve suddenly started up anyway?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by ramAnag View Post
                  It may also, imo, be a tad naive of you to criticise me ‘painting it as an elite privilege’. I’m sure there are a minority of less well healed people in Independent schools, in fact I know there are…however they are likely to have won scholarships which will cover many of the fees
                  This suggests You know less than you think you do, especially around scholarships. In my experience 10% - 40% to maybe ten kids per year and based on merit not need. You might be thinking of bursaries which are up to 100% for the genuinely poor, and maybe a victim of the proposed VAT change, who knows

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Trickytreesreds View Post
                    Careful, you're bringing up his former profession again, he doesn't like that mentioning and goes ballastic
                    To paraphrase Hans Gruber, ‘I think you missed 60 Minutes’

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Andy_Faber View Post
                      This suggests You know less than you think you do, especially around scholarships. In my experience 10% - 40% to maybe ten kids per year and based on merit not need. You might be thinking of bursaries which are up to 100% for the genuinely poor, and maybe a victim of the proposed VAT change, who knows
                      Again quite possible and it is fair to say that my experience is certainly ‘dated’…however it is something of a truism, imo, that the Independent/Private/‘Public’ school sector is primarily aimed at the well off. Beyond that we’ll have to agree to differ.

                      Comment


                      • Clarkson Never a dull moment


                        Jeremy Clarkson tears into Labour and says he’d rather vote for his dog than Keir Starmer
                        The TV presenter turned farmer said the party wants "open borders, zero growth and everyone living in a bucket of shame".


                        Jeremy Clarkson has ripped into Keir Starmer and his party declaring he’d rather vote for his dog.

                        The typically to the point former Top Gear presenter turned farmer had a lot to say about the upcoming General Election in his latest column.

                        Clarkson, who stars in Clarkson’s Farm chronicling his life in Chipping Norton in West Oxfordshire, talked about how he could see some appeal in all the main parties - except Labour.

                        He said he was “struggling to work out” which way he should vote but gave a rundown of how he could understand why people would back the Lib Dems, Reform, Greens and - although disparaging about the party - The Conservatives.

                        However he then added he “cannot find a single redeeming feature” about the Labour Party saying that “not a single candidate has said one word” that he agrees with in his column for The Sun.


                        Clarkson slammed Labour for a range of issues - including tax
                        He wrote: “They want open borders, zero growth and everyone living in a bucket of shame because their great great grandad once bought a hairbrush that had possibly been made by slaves.

                        “Their manifesto contains just 87 words on farming. Which, when translated into English basically say: ‘We hate you, you meat-eating rural halfwits.’”

                        His main gripe is over the possibility that Labour will introduce inheritance tax on farm land which Clarkson argues means that in 20 years there’ll be no farm land left in the UK - and is furious that people face the possibility of having hard-earned savings given to those who “haven’t worked at all.”

                        He added that he’d “rather vote for my dog than Sir Starmer’s merry bunch of ideological nincompoops”.

                        Comment


                        • 3,312 likes, 85 comments - terry.tvchristian on June 19, 2024: "Yes often a subject for cognitive dissonance Dave down the dog and duck".


                          Schrodinger's Immigrant 😄

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by ramAnag View Post
                            Again quite possible and it is fair to say that my experience is certainly ‘dated’…however it is something of a truism, imo, that the Independent/Private/‘Public’ school sector is primarily aimed at the well off. Beyond that we’ll have to agree to differ.
                            …but the tax change will only hurt those middle earners grafting to improve their kids’ chances, it’s an irrelevance to the swans milk-quaffing Quentins of this world. Still it will appeal to those who only think of the ‘headline - a ‘populist’ policy, who’d have thought it of Labour?

                            Criticisms aimed at the policy not you btw, and I think TTR’s missed the point that we are talking about education because that’s just the current subject matter

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Andy_Faber View Post
                              …but the tax change will only hurt those middle earners grafting to improve their kids’ chances, it’s an irrelevance to the swans milk-quaffing Quentins of this world. Still it will appeal to those who only think of the ‘headline - a ‘populist’ policy, who’d have thought it of Labour?

                              Criticisms aimed at the policy not you btw, and I think TTR’s missed the point that we are talking about education because that’s just the current subject matter
                              I was actually taking the piss, lets not fall out the boat.

                              Talking of taking the piss, I do love the current Tory panic over reform. They even have Johnson at it, though he forgot to engage his brain before hurling the insult. Oh the irony at that attack.

                              Nigel Farage has hit back at Boris Johnson after the former prime minister labelled him "morally repugnant" over comments he made about the war in Ukraine. The Reform UK leader accused Mr Johnson of ...

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
                                Dear old Terry, never really recovered from the L7 incident

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X