Our Nige clearly doesn't like Turkish people either
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Election Year or Fear!
Collapse
X
-
Your obsession with **** stirring with Farage is laughable.Originally posted by SithHappens View PostOur Nige clearly doesn't like Turkish people either
https://x.com/Nigel_Farage/status/1907090621883466108
The whole point of the video, was the exposure of "Turkish" barbers, not being Turkish , but a sympton of the stupid immigration laws this country has, exploited by criminals to launder crime money.
Every town has them. The police do nothing, the council don't care and take business rates money, Politicians ignore it, except like STARMER, MENTION IT WHEN ELECTIONS are coming up.
Everyone knows that town centres, are full of Turkish barbers/ nail bars/ fast food dives/ car washes, employing illegal workers in the establishments and also in the crime market raising the cash to be laundered.
So if you are attacking his comments in this video , I can only assume you are comfortable with the whole scam and happy to see them laugh in the countrys face at our weakness.
I think you need to grab a socialy workers placard, and run for a free Palestime march, where you can trash Farage/Trump/Jews/ Tories etc among many of of the same ilk as you .
I'm sure you'll feel much happier instead wasting it on here.
Comment
-
What a strange URL. I clicked on it, couldn't scroll as I got a banner with 3 "boxes" to choose from to accept, refuse or manage cookies. None of the 3 are clickable. Might I be being discriminated against because I'm abroad?Originally posted by Trickytreesreds View Postif these two clowns, try to put that trip on their expenses, tehy need taking to task. Again Labour can't its nose out of another countrys politics,
https://www.itv.com/news/2025-04-06/...whxGve0mbiCAOQ
Comment
-
The man who hasn’t stopped obsessing over Starmer since last July? He means people who disagree with him. Take it as a compliment.Originally posted by SithHappens View PostNo, you just assume because a small minority might be what you say then all are.
And what in earth are you on about, why do I want to trash Jews? Why should I be on a free Palestine march?
What do you mean same ilk as me?
Comment
-
Jeffrey Sachs on Trump's economic policy:
"Tariffs are going to lower living standards.
They're going to wreck the US economy, and they're being put on for unbelievably bizarre and mistaken reasons that are completely fallacious.
Let me explain.
The United States runs a large deficit in its trade in goods and services — what's called the current account of the United States — and that deficit is about a trillion dollars.
Trump says, 'Oh, that's because other countries are ripping off the United States.'
I can't even begin to say how absurd that line is.
[The word is childish.]
Running a current account deficit means — and it means precisely — that the United States is spending more than it's producing. That's what leads to a deficit. You spend more than you produce.
And we spend more than we produce because we have very low saving in this country. We have an enormous budget deficit.
So the government is like the national credit card — it runs on credit.
It transfers money, pays for wars, pays for Israel’s wars, pays for military bases in 80 countries around the world, pays for that more than a trillion-dollar-a-year military establishment, and hundreds of billions more of associated spending on the military-industrial complex.
And it gives tax cuts for the richest Americans.
It allows for tax evasion by the richest Americans — and I mean evasion, because it doesn't do audits, and it guts enforcement of the tax laws.
So we hemorrhage deficits and have rising public debt.
And because of all that, the spending of our country is much larger than our national income.
It’s a trillion dollars more than national income.
It is exactly the imbalance of our imports of goods and services over our exports of goods and services.
All of this is to say that what Trump calls a 'ripoff' is just the absolute irresponsibility of the political class in Washington.
It's a corrupt, plutocratic gangsterism that gives away the taxes and tax cuts to the richest people and goes on war after war — on credit.
And that leads to these large deficits that Trump then blames on other countries.
Now he's going to correct these deficits, he thinks, by raising tariffs.
And of course, it's going to do nothing of the kind.
The deficits are going to continue because they come from the profligacy of Washington.
They don't come from the fact that other countries are ripping us off.
So he'll raise the tariffs. Americans will shift their spending, say, from an imported automobile to domestic automobiles. That's true. They'll pay higher prices for those domestic automobiles. And our auto industry will export less abroad.
So yes — there will be fewer imports and fewer exports, and the balance won’t budge.
And none of it's going to change the fiscal recklessness.
Because what's Trump’s highest aspiration? It is to continue tax cuts for the richest Americans, which is going to cost another $4 trillion over the next 10 years in the budget.
Because these tax cuts are supposed to end, but he says, 'No, no, no — these are taxes for my rich donors, so they're going to continue.'
So he's not going to solve the budget crisis.
He's not going to solve the trade deficit — because that comes from the budget crisis.
But what he's going to do is lower the living standards of our country and the world.
Because trade is beneficial in living standards — it's called gains from trade.
We buy more cheaply. We sell goods that we have a comparative advantage in. And both sides gain from trade.
Of course, we overdo it, because we overspend — but that’s a completely different thing.
No one’s ripping off the United States by these numbers.
I don’t know whether it's just rhetoric or ignorance or confusion, but it's unbelievably bad economic policy.
It will come to no good.
And incidentally, you mentioned rightly that tariffs are, of course, a tax. So who’s supposed to have authority over taxes?
[Congress.]
And Congress has nothing to say in this. This is a one-person show.
What did we become in this country? Even King George wouldn't levy taxes without the British Parliament in the 18th century.
So what happened to this country? Trump just says, 'Oh, it's an emergency,' and now we have one-person rule — and one-person rule on completely fallacious premises that don’t pass the first day of study of what a trade deficit is.
I taught that for more than 20 years at Harvard University — what is a trade deficit, how does it relate to the excess of spending over production, how does it relate to the excess of investment in a country over a low saving rate?
Well, none of this seems to register.
No one asks a question.
There isn’t a day of hearings.
There isn’t any analysis.
It’s a one-person show based on economic fallacies that are going to wreck our economy, wreck the world trading system.
And I can tell you — all over the world, because I am talking with leaders all over the world, and recently in Asia — the words to describe this, you can’t say in polite company."
From https://x.com/nxt888/status/1907679118449418269
Comment
-
yes, it was ITV newsOriginally posted by MadAmster View PostWhat a strange URL. I clicked on it, couldn't scroll as I got a banner with 3 "boxes" to choose from to accept, refuse or manage cookies. None of the 3 are clickable. Might I be being discriminated against because I'm abroad?
Comment
-
self explanatoryOriginally posted by SithHappens View PostNo, you just assume because a small minority might be what you say then all are.
And what in earth are you on about, why do I want to trash Jews? Why should I be on a free Palestine march?
What do you mean same ilk as me?
You take a great delight in assuming Farage/Trump etc say things that they actually dont. Did you even watch that video, as what you wrote has absolutely nothing to do with your insinuation. The palestine marches are riddled with those that assume like you
Comment
-
I told you especially, that after that election, I was going to launch into Starmer and crew, after your daily, every thread attempts to poo the Tories. We got it the Tories were ****, but I also told you this lot would be no better. In fact they are worse.Originally posted by ramAnag View PostThe man who hasn’t stopped obsessing over Starmer since last July? He means people who disagree with him. Take it as a compliment.
Comment
-
back on my subject. These two are outright liars and deserve all the flak they are getting.
The Labour MP’s who decided to earn their 90k salary by swanning off to interfere in Middle East conflict have released a statement. Wait for it; the they also took their aides also paid for by us.
They lied and claimed to be part of an official delegation visiting Israel on behalf of the British parliament, however, this turned out to be untrue.
They were denied entrance to Israel on Saturday, after an investigation reportedly revealed that the two wished to enter the country to document the activities of security forces and spread anti-Israel hatred, Israel's Population and Immigration Authority announced.
At airport security, the passengers claimed to be part of an official delegation visiting Israel on behalf of the British parliament.
However, the Population and Immigration Authority claimed this was untrue as no official in Israel had approved the arrival of the delegation.
The Labour Party is clearly STILL riddled with anti semite lefties and Islamist.
Comment
-
…in your opinion, which of course you are entitled to.Originally posted by Trickytreesreds View PostI told you especially, that after that election, I was going to launch into Starmer and crew, after your daily, every thread attempts to poo the Tories. We got it the Tories were ****, but I also told you this lot would be no better. In fact they are worse.
However you are, as ever, missing the point. At least my objections to the likes of Johnson, Hancock, Cummings, Patel and Truss - which the electorate appeared to share - were based on their actions, not on what you anticipated happening.
You had, by your own admission, made your mind up on Starmer even before day one, so it seems a bit rich for you to call another poster ‘obsessed’ over Farage when you consider his self serving track record of causing havoc in this country over the last ten years or more.Last edited by ramAnag; 06-04-2025, 05:17 PM.
Comment
-
But I think he?s right rA, you are both obsessed in your different ways. At least you keep it relatively civil, there?s some real hate elsewhere on the internetOriginally posted by ramAnag View Post?in your opinion, which of course you are entitled to.
However you are, as ever, missing the point. At least my objections to the likes of Johnson, Hancock, Cummings, Patel and Truss - which the electorate appeared to share - were based on their actions, not on what you anticipated happening.
You had, by your own admission, made your mind up on Starmer even before day one, so it seems a bit rich for you to call another poster ?obsessed? over Farage when you consider his self serving track record of causing havoc in this country over the last ten years or more.
Comment
-
No you owe me an apology, why say I trash jews?Originally posted by Trickytreesreds View Postself explanatory
You take a great delight in assuming Farage/Trump etc say things that they actually dont. Did you even watch that video, as what you wrote has absolutely nothing to do with your insinuation. The palestine marches are riddled with those that assume like you
And Andy, why haven't you pulled him up on this?
Comment

Comment