Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Election Year or Fear!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ultimately none times and three logins required

    Comment


    • Originally posted by swaledale View Post
      Bold move by Reform to put Goodwin, an ex academic turned right wog hate monger and grifter as the cnadidate in the fothcoming byelection.

      Goodwin is basically the same as Farage, will say anything contentious as long as it gets him, money, fame and possibly power. One can respect a politician of whatever colour who acts out his true beleifs, but these grifters who don't actually belive anything they say, indeed will say whatever they think advances their own interests are bizarre, contradictory and hypocritical.

      Still some brain dead voters will vote for them I guess.
      Ok this one breaks my new years resolution somewhat, but rest assured temporarily.

      Never thought I'd see Swale referring to someone as a "right wog hate monger and grifter". Been taking public speaking lessons from Alf Garnett?

      Comment


      • Reform report Labour to police for posting video where Matt Goodwin says negative things about Manchester



        Bit sensitive, they won't cope in government if this makes them tearful

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
          Ok this one breaks my new years resolution somewhat, but rest assured temporarily.

          Never thought I'd see Swale referring to someone as a "right wog hate monger and grifter". Been taking public speaking lessons from Alf Garnett?
          Saw it and had a giggle. Pretty sure mistyped and raised a smile because swale probably last person who might use the term wog.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by SithHappens View Post
            Saw it and had a giggle. Pretty sure mistyped and raised a smile because swale probably last person who might use the term wog.
            I’m sure Swale meant ‘right wing’. He’s not immune to typos, but I am surprised ‘w@g’ got through seeing as we’re not allowed to say s*x, or vit@l. Just shows how bonkers those who run the site can be. (No, not you AF…the useless untouchables and uncontactables above you.)
            Last edited by ramAnag; 28-01-2026, 05:25 PM.

            Comment


            • A little perplexing the banned words for sure, but at least this way the boy scouts amongst us dont have to refer to our ***gles. I seem to remember some years ago we tested the system to see what was allowed and what wasnt - there were some grievous anomalies

              Comment


              • NL. The 3 party leaders reached agreement and yesterday they had meetings with their MPs to let them see the content. The 3 meet again today to discuss any minor adjustments the MPs have suggested /demanded. Tomorrow the plan will be presented to Parliament. Cabinet expected to be named in the next week to 10 days. Then they can start work. 3 months from election date to coalition being formed. However, there was a 5 month period pre election from the time the previous cabinet fell.

                Comment


                • they sound like the Weyward Sisters...when shall we three meet again

                  Comment


                  • What a futile and banal comment. The last 3 coalitions have taken 6, 8 and 9 months between election date and coalition forming. I think you might have been attempting humour. Fail.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Ram Pant View Post
                      What a futile and banal comment. The last 3 coalitions have taken 6, 8 and 9 months between election date and coalition forming. I think you might have been attempting humour. Fail.
                      Moving on and more seriously. I’m no advocate of anarchy and it doesn’t sound, from a distance, as if the Netherlands have been experiencing such a state over recent times, but what, in your opinion, has been the clearest manifestation of this period of lack of effective leadership and government?

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by ramAnag View Post
                        I’m sure Swale meant ‘right wing’. He’s not immune to typos, but I am surprised ‘w@g’ got through seeing as we’re not allowed to say s*x, or vit@l. Just shows how bonkers those who run the site can be. (No, not you AF…the useless untouchables and uncontactables above you.)
                        Eh yes mea culpa, must read my posts back, but when one has posted it twice, copied it and eventually got it posted one loses the will to live.

                        Mm I'd include the useleess untouchbles as AF, who always fails to make any sensible comment whenever his favoured right wing grifters are shown to be liars, purveyors of bull**** and hate.

                        But bizarrely comes down heavy when one accidentally infers that 40% of those "wonderful community minded" chaps and ladies who rioted, were known to the police in connection with domestic abuse, child abuse and ***ual offences. I wondered why he was so quick to be the "hard man" on that issue?

                        I mean its not like any of them would sue this site is it and it was probably not too big a correlation to say that if 40% of those arrested were known to the police, that a significant percentage of those ignorant thugs taking part were of similar ilk. But then it struk me, perhaps AF had friends involved in the riots, highly likely given he seems broadly supportive of racists, xenophobes islamaphobs and the like.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
                          Ok this one breaks my new years resolution somewhat, but rest assured temporarily.

                          Never thought I'd see Swale referring to someone as a "right wog hate monger and grifter". Been taking public speaking lessons from Alf Garnett?
                          Thank goodness for that, I'm rather enjoying not have to read the BS you post and your pathetic attempts at humour. Long may it last!

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by swaledale View Post
                            Its interesting, maybe the Tory party will morph back to a party that is actually composed of "sensible" politicians? Reform is now the place for the loons, grifters, gob****es, those incapable of rational thought and whose view of themselves far exceeds their ability.

                            How Farage is going to be able to sell reform as a "new" way of doing politics when the majority of its MP's are Tory failures?

                            Another of Goodwin's bizarre claims, is this claim that a uinveristy educated elite hold the power, when firstly he is univeristy eductaed and secondly its obvious that its financial institutions and a the billionaires who have the power and he doesn't mention them and is more than happy to be funded by them!
                            Oops spoke to soon. No sooner had I posted that the Tory party might become more sensible, than Bad Enoch gives a speech basically saying that the Tories were more right wing than Refom and she had gone further to the right since becoming leader and anybody who disagreed with that should leave the party!!

                            So presumably all non extreme right leaning conservatives will now defect to the Liberal party?? She is nearly as crazy as Truss, becuase trying to out Reform Reform isn't going to work. Ah well back to political chaos where hate, division, lies, etc rules.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by SithHappens View Post
                              Reform report Labour to police for posting video where Matt Goodwin says negative things about Manchester



                              Bit sensitive, they won't cope in government if this makes them tearful
                              Police told them no offence committed.

                              Reform now threatening to sue Kemi Badenoch for mental health comments about Suella Braverman unless she gets an apology from Badenoch...even though Badenoch has apologised.

                              This from a party led by farage who labelled Zack Polanski a lunatic not long ago.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by swaledale View Post
                                Eh yes mea culpa, must read my posts back, but when one has posted it twice, copied it and eventually got it posted one loses the will to live.

                                Mm I'd include the useleess untouchbles as AF, who always fails to make any sensible comment whenever his favoured right wing grifters are shown to be liars, purveyors of bull**** and hate.

                                But bizarrely comes down heavy when one accidentally infers that 40% of those "wonderful community minded" chaps and ladies who rioted, were known to the police in connection with domestic abuse, child abuse and ***ual offences. I wondered why he was so quick to be the "hard man" on that issue?

                                I mean its not like any of them would sue this site is it and it was probably not too big a correlation to say that if 40% of those arrested were known to the police, that a significant percentage of those ignorant thugs taking part were of similar ilk. But then it struk me, perhaps AF had friends involved in the riots, highly likely given he seems broadly supportive of racists, xenophobes islamaphobs and the like.
                                lol at your utter obsession with me

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X