Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Islay guest spot

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Islay guest spot

    In the courier today. 😄

  • #2
    I think if he had the choice either dundee fc dies or nelms continues I reckon he would prefer the former.Nae idea about his fallout but must be something major to have so much hatred and seethe about nelms.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by eric_sinclair View Post
      I think if he had the choice either dundee fc dies or nelms continues I reckon he would prefer the former.Nae idea about his fallout but must be something major to have so much hatred and seethe about nelms.
      As can be seen by his ramblings on here he is one bitter old basturd.

      As I keep posting, it?s no surprise he?s banned from numerous places.

      Did he mention ferries?

      Comment


      • #4
        Some people just have nothing nice to say about anyone.

        Must be a sad and lonely existence for people like that, so full of hatred. I'm really grateful that I have so many friends from diverse backgrounds - christian. Moslem (don't know any Jews personally), black, white, brown, Scottish, Welsh, Irish and of course English - all lovely, friendly people just like me. It definitely makes me feel good about the world.

        Comment


        • #5
          Disagree that Islay would choose death of club if it meant John Nelms would no longer be involved.
          As hinted by Rross everything in the Courier is basically a list of the points that have been made by Islay ( and others).
          It is frustrating that the access problems cannot be solved, my opinion is that they cannot be solved, so perhaps someone who knows what they are talking about can provide any kind of solution? It must be the place to start, and I don't understand why it has been impossible to solve this most fundamental problem.
          If Courier article generates more discussion, it might help by bringing in a new approach. Tweaking what has been done so far, does not seem to be working.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by BCram View Post
            Disagree that Islay would choose death of club if it meant John Nelms would no longer be involved.
            As hinted by Rross everything in the Courier is basically a list of the points that have been made by Islay ( and others).
            It is frustrating that the access problems cannot be solved, my opinion is that they cannot be solved, so perhaps someone who knows what they are talking about can provide any kind of solution? It must be the place to start, and I don't understand why it has been impossible to solve this most fundamental problem.
            If Courier article generates more discussion, it might help by bringing in a new approach. Tweaking what has been done so far, does not seem to be working.
            Money....that's why it can't be solved.

            Comment


            • #7
              I did not think there was any solution. If there is no affordable alternative why have our owners been so fixed on Campy?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by BCram View Post
                I did not think there was any solution. If there is no affordable alternative why have our owners been so fixed on Campy?
                £3 mill in......and no real long term interest in football club without stadium.

                I notice we haven't re applied for training facility either.....no idea why.....did they not say they were gonna reapply straight away?

                Might still happen and slo seems to be hinting at February but Nelms has a history of using folk to get fans hopes up without saying much himself......then another date passes.

                Getting planning in principle through would only be the start of much squabbling, appeals , govt intervention imho.

                If we are kicking a ball in any new stadium B4 the end of the decade I'd be very very very surprised

                Comment


                • #9
                  If the training facility site was refused, why would they reapply? Maybe Gardyne is back as a possible solution?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by BCram View Post
                    If the training facility site was refused, why would they reapply? Maybe Gardyne is back as a possible solution?
                    Wasn't refused it was overturned by govt on technicality.....councils fault......from what I've read.

                    Pretty sure they were gonna reapply

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X