Trump

[Deeranged]

Has massively over stepped the mark this time.

[Returnofrros]

Wish he'd invade here.

[noahrab]

Has massively over stepped the mark this time.

FFS he?s no called you Jock, has he?

[jdfc]

Think he has a point, some of those NATO countries didn?t put much into Afghanistan, haven?t heard it all, did he actually say British soldiers weren?t on the frontline or is it the anti Trump msm trying to stir it up

[Returnofrros]

Think he has a point, some of those NATO countries didn?t put much into Afghanistan, haven?t heard it all, did he actually say British soldiers weren?t on the frontline or is it the anti Trump msm trying to stir it up

Can't mind exact quote

But the left in a tiz.

Now......illegal wars don't matter.

Funniest bit is the ginger prince.......Cannae stand up to his Mrs, whinges about folk taking his photo and needs Mair security than fort Knox but wants to fight Trump. 😊

[Deeranged]

Think he has a point, some of those NATO countries didn?t put much into Afghanistan, haven?t heard it all, did he actually say British soldiers weren?t on the frontline or is it the anti Trump msm trying to stir it up

Suggested that NATO troops didn't fight on the front line of Afghanistan - a shocking comment to make especially by a known coward.

Maybe people that haven't served in war time see it differently to those of us that have but, for me, he should apologise for this.

[Piscean]

At least he stands up to the globalists and gives them both barrels. Starmer is in their pocket.

[jdfc]

Suggested that NATO troops didn't fight on the front line of Afghanistan - a shocking comment to make especially by a known coward.

Maybe people that haven't served in war time see it differently to those of us that have but, for me, he should apologise for this.

Thought it might be more about numbers of troops these other countries sent, I haven?t heard it all, did he actually single out uk forces for not being in the front line

[Deeranged]

Thought it might be more about numbers of troops these other countries sent, I haven?t heard it all, did he actually single out uk forces for not being in the front line

I didn't say he singled out UK troops, he said NATO troops and was clearly saying it was all NATO except USA. He said they didn't fight on the front line but held back off it - a blatant lie.

[Deeranged]

And there you have it, he's apologised but only with respect to UK troops - well, as much as he can apologise.

[Returnofrros]

That was quick.

Hell will freeze over afore Blair, Sturgeon or Starmer apologise.

[Deeranged]

That was quick.

Hell will freeze over afore Blair, Sturgeon or Starmer apologise.

Very true

[BCram]

That was quick.

Hell will freeze over afore Blair, Sturgeon or Starmer apologise.

Agree. There is a very worrying trend that thinks that the law courts are the only places where victims can get justice.
Lawyers have managed to manipulate public opinion to think that money is the only form of justice available.

Public enquiries where vested interests and politicians are protected are simply a gravy train for the law firms employed. Quangos are shields for incompetent politicians and their complete lack of ability to form sensible laws or make economically valid policies.

[BCram]

Agree. There is a very worrying trend that thinks that the law courts are the only places where victims can get justice.
Lawyers have managed to manipulate public opinion to think that money is the only form of justice available.

Public enquiries where vested interests and politicians are protected are simply a gravy train for the law firms employed. Quangos are shields for incompetent politicians and their complete lack of ability to form sensible laws or make economically valid policies.

Re read my post above. Didn't explain that apologising means admitting a mistake. Lawyers have made this basic admission into a massive legal claim for compensation, hence nobody ever makes a personal statement accepting responsibility,imo.

[Deebunked]

I didn't say he singled out UK troops, he said NATO troops and was clearly saying it was all NATO except USA. He said they didn't fight on the front line but held back off it - a blatant lie.

\

It seems to me he simply forgets that UK personnel in that theatre were NATO troops, because if we get off the offended bus we can see 85% of all NATO troops killed in Afghan were American, British or Canadian.

His statement wasn't far off if he said NATO with exception of UK and Canada.....There are 32 countries in NATO but these three took most of the losses. France, same size as UK, lost 86 people compared to UK's 453 as an example. Germany lost 54. The UK can, and most likely forever will do, trust the Five Eyes countries but the that's about it as far as trust goes.