Ok, not football at all, but it matters, eventually.

[WTF11]

https://www.youtube.com/live/GomeFSp...WBhOg8lsFSi4cX

and bondi was just the start

Tousi TV? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[WTF11]

https://www.youtube.com/live/GomeFSp...WBhOg8lsFSi4cX

and bondi was just the start

So this "huge story" can't be found on the news pages of sites from the BBC, CNN, AND, CBS, or ANY of the Australian news organisations, strange (or maybe not for conspiracy theorists and the like, all the mainstream media the world over colluding to hide the truth, yep sounds likely).

[ozleeds]

Tousi TV? ��������������

that's why i poste that just to your reaction because the dude is a jew.
That footage is from our local networks but here is the story as i can't link it because it's under paywall.

A carload of men from Victoria has been stopped by heavily armed tactical police in Sydney’s south-west while travelling to Bondi Beach, potentially armed, for unknown reasons.

The men were driving a white hatchback with Victorian plates through Liverpool when they were rammed by the tactical operations unit.
Unit members in camouflage and with heavy weapons drawn pulled five men onto the footpath and handcuffed them with zip ties. Some of the men appeared to be injured and bleeding.

Sources with knowledge of the unfolding operation, not permitted to speak publicly, said a weapon may have been found in the car, though that was unconfirmed.

The motive of the men was also unclear. The group was flagged because they were known to authorities in Victoria, sources said.

A second hatchback, also with Victorian number plates, was intercepted a few streets away and two men were arrested.
NSW Police said in a statement shortly after 8.15pm that the operation had concluded and there was no ongoing risk to the community.

“Police have not identified any connection to the current police investigation of the Bondi terror attack,” the statement said.

The operation was in response to “information received that a violent act was possibly being planned”.

In footage posted on social media, five men could be seen lying on the road and footpath at the intersection of George Street and Campbell Street on Thursday afternoon.

The vision shows one man whose head appears to be bleeding. In later footage, he appears to have been bandaged.

https://thenightly.com.au/australia/...ach-c-21048327 this might work for you or not.
But hey hooo it's news from Australia it's probably fake hey lol.

[ozleeds]

So this "huge story" can't be found on the news pages of sites from the BBC, CNN, AND, CBS, or ANY of the Australian news organisations, strange (or maybe not for conspiracy theorists and the like, all the mainstream media the world over colluding to hide the truth, yep sounds likely).

WTF you tell us the bbc and American media are BS and you go there to find the story lol You could not have searched hard as it's all over the media even aljezara what ever they called had it and the dw German channel lol

[WTF11]

WTF you tell us the bbc and American media are BS and you go there to find the story lol You could not have searched hard as it's all over the media even aljezara what ever they called had it and the dw German channel lol

When have I accused any of the mainstream media, including but not limited to the BBC, to be B.S.?

And the account you give of the "incident" is full of conjecture ( No id of those stopped, they may or may not have been armed, the reasons for travel aren't known, they may have been planning a "violent act" but who knows, etc etc etc, and empty of actual facts, what a surprise.

[ozleeds]

When have I accused any of the mainstream media, including but not limited to the BBC, to be B.S.?

And the account you give of the "incident" is full of conjecture ( No id of those stopped, they may or may not have been armed, the reasons for travel aren't known, they may have been planning a "violent act" but who knows, etc etc etc, and empty of actual facts, what a surprise.

Ohhh don't worry i recall perhaps go back and read your post.
Anyway billy this is for you merry Islam.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/3026864640811284.

[Billyni]

Ohhh don't worry i recall perhaps go back and read your post.
Anyway billy this is for you merry Islam.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/3026864640811284.

Methinks somewhere along the line, you have misinterpreted me.

[WTF11]

Methinks somewhere along the line, you have misinterpreted me.

What a surprise that would be!🤣🤣

[ozleeds]

Methinks somewhere along the line, you have misinterpreted me.

How? You said you're my mate, and as mates we share things! e.g., you said to me about my mates when I commented on mulsims so they must be your mates also lol Now look what you started our other mate is in agreement with you god forbid lol

[WTF11]

Was watching a PBS documentary about the aftermath of the Vietnam war. Apparently in the 8 or so years of US military involvement in what many historians consider to be one of the most lethal episodes of military conflict, nearly 60,000 US military personnel were killed.

Fast forward to a time when there were no wars involving American "boots on the ground" anywhere in the world and certainly not in the continental USA, 2016 - 2024. During that period, in the USA over 365,000 people died as a result of gunshot wounds, with over 100,000 of those being homicides.

That means that overall five times as many have died in the USA from gunshot wounds inflicted by owners of legally held firearms than the US military suffered in the whole of the Vietnam war.

In the UK over that same period, the figure was between 225 and 250 (NOT thousands!).

"Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is a widely used slogan, popularized by the NRA and gun advocates, emphasizing individual responsibility in gun violence, though it's debated as a fallacy by gun control supporters who argue guns significantly enable killing. The phrase highlights guns as inanimate tools, but opponents counter that these tools drastically increase the lethality and ease with which people can cause harm, making the object's role crucial, not negligible, as shown by studies suggesting fewer gun deaths with fewer guns.

I know where I'd rather be.

[ozleeds]

Was watching a PBS documentary about the aftermath of the Vietnam war. Apparently in the 8 or so years of US military involvement in what many historians consider to be one of the most lethal episodes of military conflict, nearly 60,000 US military personnel were killed.

Fast forward to a time when there were no wars involving American "boots on the ground" anywhere in the world and certainly not in the continental USA, 2016 - 2024. During that period, in the USA over 365,000 people died as a result of gunshot wounds, with over 100,000 of those being homicides.

That means that overall five times as many have died in the USA from gunshot wounds inflicted by owners of legally held firearms than the US military suffered in the whole of the Vietnam war.

In the UK over that same period, the figure was between 225 and 250 (NOT thousands!).

"Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is a widely used slogan, popularized by the NRA and gun advocates, emphasizing individual responsibility in gun violence, though it's debated as a fallacy by gun control supporters who argue guns significantly enable killing. The phrase highlights guns as inanimate tools, but opponents counter that these tools drastically increase the lethality and ease with which people can cause harm, making the object's role crucial, not negligible, as shown by studies suggesting fewer gun deaths with fewer guns.

I know where I'd rather be.

So why do you think Trump is trying to do? The crooks have led a once proud nation to be the worst in the world. From BS black gay presidents to old men whose brains no longer function, to a wannabe president who doesn't know if she's white indian or black African.
Like most countries, they let in sickos from all over the world, and they let drugs run amok. If you want to know what sickos in power are, look at the pics coming out from the pedophiles' files.
Trump is not perfect, and I would even say dengerous but he's the only one in the western world doing something, and just like Israel is fighting a lone hand while the others dine and wine and make BS public appearances.
On trhe vietnam war Nixon caused that, and as everyone knows, he was just another loser.
On the other hand, so many lost their lives in that war, and yes, Australians also, but not from fighting, but from the orange spray.
We have European powers concerned about saving Islamic terrorists and the 60k poor lost souls bla bla but do nothing in their own soil, where so far 2 million lost there lifes and yes christian due to a mad dictator.
Anywhere you look at it WTF and others, the world is farked and nothing will be done about it till it's too late, and than were all doomed and will be living the lives of Gaza and Ukraine and looking for shelter in Africa.
No one is wrong, right, talking about this crap, it's just reality.

[WTF11]

Said it before and I suspect I'll say it again, often.....I love the USA and it's people, at least those have had the pleasure of living amongst and working with over three decades and from east to west coast. At their best they are what humankind can and should aspire to, brave, honest, courageous, open-hearted, generous (to a fault!), welcoming and true to a human spirit borne out of adversity and the desire to make a better world. The sacrifices made by Americans in the pursuit of democracy and the freedoms of individuals to live their lives free from the fear of "might is right" are the stuff of legend.

But, as Reagan said after the Challenger disaster, "we discovered that we are human, with human frailties, but we learn and we overcome" (the quote may be slightly paraphrased but the meaning is true). The USA, suffering disasters at home (Apollo 1), abroad (Vietnam), and literally out of this world (Apollo 13, "a magnificent failure"), grew and became the greatest nation on earth.

Now?

A Commander in Chief who seeks to do grubby oil deals on the back of an illegal kidnapping of the head of state of a nation he doesn't like, but which happens to have the world's largest oil reserves. A Commander in Chief and his acolytes who suggest that a sovereign state and a founding member of NATO should surrender one if it's protectorate simply because "we need it".

How the mighty have fallen.

[WTF11]

Btw, the only reason Trump can justify the statement that the USA "needs Greenland", given that Greenalnd is a protectorate of Denmark, a founding member of NATO, is that he no longer considers that relationship as relevant to USA strategic defence. Ponder the significance of that delusion.

[norfolk white]

Being a complete novice in world matter or politics, but trump taking Greenland is the same as putin taking crimea.

[ozleeds]

Being a complete novice in world matter or politics, but trump taking Greenland is the same as putin taking crimea.

Or the same as Europe taking the piss.