Team for mansfield and why.

[Old_time_miller]

1. Keeper change.
2. Fittest players first.
3. Line up and tactics accordingly.
4. As little dead wood as possible.
5. Rely on the ones who want to put a shift in.
6. Support that team.

[Back of the net]

So what tactics then?
Rely on the ones who want yo out a shift in who ?
Little dead wood as possible who ?

Support the team how ?

[Old_time_miller]

That said, we have to play players in natural positions or close and be solid and not concede first.
Cann.
Rafferty, jules, baptise, a 3 because we have no choice.
J holmes, mcwill, kelly, powell, martha,
Hugill, ayres.
Do we really have any other choice?

If you want a back 4 then assuming agbaire is not fit enough, raggett would have to play - do you really want that?
Having seen a 4 yesterday?

The team almost picks itself, so get off the manager back. He is speaking the truth.

[Old_time_miller]

So what tactics then?
Rely on the ones who want yo out a shift in who ?
Little dead wood as possible who ?

Support the team how ?

No idea yourself then, eh???

[Old_time_miller]

I used the thread to see what would come out of the woodwork. In part. Didn’t take long.

Second, to show we really do not have (assuming people who went off don’t play) much option to the team I gave, as much as some of them were poor.

Third, what really choice does hamshaw have, yet he will take the brunt without kicking a ball.

[Old_time_miller]

We are getting close to not being able to field a team.

[Old_time_miller]

People here in part need to take the blinkers off.

[Back of the net]

No idea yourself then, eh???

You don?t know then?
What a pathetic response.
Come on give us your insight into what we should be doing? You?ve called out posters so tell us what we should be doing?
I suspect a multi again on a wind up.
Pathetic.

[Old_time_miller]

You don?t know then?
What a pathetic response.
Come on give us your insight into what we should be doing? You?ve called out posters so tell us what we should be doing?
I suspect a multi again on a wind up.
Pathetic.

Try reading. I have, underlaying what the team will have to be.
Come on, have you any thoughts, or are you just another pathetic knocker pal.

[Old_time_miller]

That said, we have to play players in natural positions or close and be solid and not concede first.
Cann.
Rafferty, jules, baptise, a 3 because we have no choice.
J holmes, mcwill, kelly, powell, martha,
Hugill, ayres.
Do we really have any other choice?

If you want a back 4 then assuming agbaire is not fit enough, raggett would have to play - do you really want that?
Having seen a 4 yesterday?

The team almost picks itself, so get off the manager back. He is speaking the truth.

Repeated for those who couldn?t be bothered to read a thread,

[NorthWestCorner]

I used the thread to see what would come out of the woodwork. In part. Didn?t take long.

Second, to show we really do not have (assuming people who went off don?t play) much option to the team I gave, as much as some of them were poor.

Third, what really choice does hamshaw have, yet he will take the brunt without kicking a ball.

This is all well and good, if you choose to forget that MH signed 12/14 players in the summer. Did that not happen?

[Yak]

I used the thread to see what would come out of the woodwork. In part. Didn’t take long.

Second, to show we really do not have (assuming people who went off don’t play) much option to the team I gave, as much as some of them were poor.

Third, what really choice does hamshaw have, yet he will take the brunt without kicking a ball.

Everything that?s wrong with this board now. Used this thread to see what would come out of the woodwork.

This is the reason why posters like pocket and others I know who go home and away don?t bother.
How low has the quality of posters gone on here.
People like this trying to get a reaction rather than contributing to debate.
Multi ? Maybe either way not with the time.

[Yak]

Worth the time not with the time.

[ManorFarmMiller]

Go 4141 for me.

Dawson - not done too much wrong, isnt the main problem

Rafferty, Raggett, Baptiste, Jules - Simple back 4 - risky I know

Kelly - no-one else fit

Holmes (J), McW, Powell, Martha

Etete

4141 - assuming no Hall, or anyone coming back. Would have young Richardson on the bench too.

[Derbymiller]

4-2-3-1 or 4-1-3-2
Depends on available players. 3 at the back leaves gaps wide for opposition wingers it has cost us a lot of goals.
Ideal choice for both
Rafferty-raggett-jules-james
Gore, mcwilliams
Hall, Spence, Powell
Nombe

Rafferty-raggett-jules-james
Gore
Hall,Spence,Powell
Nombe, Benson

Now with injuries
Baptiste can play anywhere on the back four, agbaire can play 2 out of the 4, we have young Duncan as well
Kelly can cover gore as can yearwood
Etete is an option as is ayres.


Martha and Hugill shouldn't be anywhere near a start