The 10% Men or Women

[CAMiller]

Also known as agents

Only 6 teams in L1 spent less than us on agent fees over the last 12 months. Indication of good fiscal management by the executives and MH or just plain old tight fistedness?

Whatever you spend doesn't necessarily seem to indicate success. We spent around 225K whereas Lincoln spent slightly less and are top of the league. Luton spent over 3.3M with Udders and Cardiff being the only others spending north of 1M.

https://www.rotherhamadvertiser.co.uk/sport/football/rotherham-united/how-much-rotherham-united-paid-to-agents-during-matt-hamshaws-reign-6540075

Pales into insignificance though compared the PL with Burnley being the lowest spenders at over 7M and Chelsea the highest at over 60M. Must be comforting to them as it contributes towards losses exceeding 200M, not a great team and on the verge of parting company with yet another manager.

[Old_time_miller]

Too much considering the lack of quality brought in.

[Townerslovechild]

Chelsea, 60 million just on agents,that is obscene.

[Brin]

Chelsea, 60 million just on agents,that is obscene.

That's just the declared money......which by the way you can lay this at a lot of clubs. There's more goes off behind closed doors when clubs try to get a player in than is let on. Houses, cars they all come into play and just get filtered through as assets belonging to the club.