Tweet
The money makers get my vote.
-
-
That link shows a Twitter poll, frog.Comment
-
Cheers. I’ve updated it.Originally posted by Eternal Optimist View Post
Some bonkers guy that used to work for the US government who is telling the history of SARS and stating the date line of the Pfizer spike protein vaccine and how it had been proven not to work in thousands of independent studies.
They’d sue him if he was lying wouldn’t they? Or does he have protection if he says it in the EU Parliament building?Comment
-
Good.
So now my post makes zero sense!
Might make sense to delete it. And this one...Comment
-
Great video, confirming that - as I said a few days back - we've ALL been duped. A highly organised scam from top to bottom - with chilling aims.Originally posted by frogmiller View PostComment
-
BBC 'misrepresented' Covid risk to boost lockdown support, says top scientist
By 'misrepresent', they mean lie.
The BBC was allowed to “misrepresent (lie about)” the risk posed by Covid to most people to boost public support for lockdown, the UK Covid Inquiry has heard.
Prof Mark Woolhouse, an eminent epidemiologist and government adviser, lambasted the corporation for having “repeatedly reported rare deaths or illnesses among healthy adults as if they were the norm”.
He said this created the “misleading impression” among BBC News viewers at the start of the pandemic that “we are all at risk” and “the virus does not discriminate”.
In reality, he said it was known at the time that the risk of dying from Covid was 10,000 times higher in the over-75s than the under-15s.
But Prof Woolhouse told the Covid Inquiry the BBC did not correct its reporting, saying: “I suspect this misinformation was allowed to stand throughout 2020 because it provided a justification for locking down the entire population.”
He said further evidence of this was provided by a briefing dated March 22 2020 by a sub-group of the UK Government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) that focused on the public’s behaviour.
Prof Woolhouse said the “misperception” created by the BBC’s coverage that everyone was at risk was a “barrier to targeting interventions at the vulnerable minority who truly were at high risk from Covid”.
In his written submission to the inquiry about the impact north of the Border, he said: “I fear that Scottish Government’s pandemic response was compromised as a result.”
He also concluded that lockdown had been “least effective at protecting the most vulnerable precisely because of their need to have contacts with health care and social care workers — self-isolation was not an option.” The expert added: “This should have been recognised from the outset.”
This stated that “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened; it could be that they are reassured by the low death rate in their demographic group... the perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging”.Comment
-
Post mortem findings. These clots reported regular
Comment
-
Just another coincidence I'm sure...Originally posted by frogmiller View Post
https://bigtechtopia.com/2020/09/bbc...es-foundation/BBC receives millions from the Gates FoundationComment
-
-
Just blaming the Chinese is an easy cop out! But it's another one to add to the growing list of doubters!
Why have they stopped looking for the source of the pandemic? Never in history has so little effort been put into something that has done so much harm to so many people!!!!Last edited by frogmiller; 26-01-2024, 12:02 PM.Comment
-
Vaccinated kids and how they were ingnored by Pfizer
Comment
-
Yep, the BBC have gone a long way away from just reporting facts about events in the world.Originally posted by Eternal Optimist View Post
Fingers in many pies
Comment
-
Originally posted by Grist_To_The_Mill View Post
It sounds as though you consider Billy Boy's money to have specifically gone to media action, but that meant they could free up more money for their principle task of lying through their back teeth to the public.
If you believe he genuinely has good intentions then you won't be convinced whatever.
I've spent years observing him and have come to the conclusion that he is evil personified.Comment
Comment