Prediction League Update 08/11 v Oxford

[Bombers right foot]

ELITE LEAGUE
340 Dubbag (x)
320 Q165
320 WBA123
310 BaggieAl (x)
310 SWMBO

PREMIER LEAGUE
280 Tipperary Baggie (pl)
270 Phild (EL)
270 Titchfield Baggie (x)
260 Nilocrm (EL)
250 Astle 71 (pl)
240 Prando

CHAMPIONSHIP
230 Calvinboy (pl)
230 Bills Best (pl)
220 Bombers right foot (CH)
220 Epsom Baggie (pl)
200 Albie Blue (EL)
200 Mavis Doolittle

HELL ZONE
190 1060 Albion (pl)
190 Swedish Baggie
130 Boingy
130 Stargazer 1962 (EL)

HIGHLIGHTS

Albion v Oxford
Still very tight throughout the league, 4 posters called the correct score, WBA123, Titchfieldbaggie, Nilocrm and Prando, all 50 points to the good
13 others predicted the correct result


FGS..No takers for the fgs plus bonus?Oxford own goal

Next up is Frank Lampard?s Coventry, after the international break

[On Balance]

The official unofficial update.

Supporting Stomp.

ELITE LEAGUE
340 Dubbag (x)
320 Q165
320 WBA123
310 BaggieAl (x)
310 SWMBO

PREMIER LEAGUE
280 Tipperary Baggie (pl)
270 Phild (EL)
270 Titchfield Baggie (x)
260 Nilocrm (EL)
250 Astle 71 (pl)
240 Prando

CHAMPIONSHIP
230 Calvinboy (pl)
230 Bills Best (pl)
220 Bombers right foot (CH)
220 Epsom Baggie (pl)
210 On Balance
200 Albie Blue (EL)
200 Mavis Doolittle

HELL ZONE
190 1060 Albion (pl)
190 Swedish Baggie
130 Boingy
130 Stargazer 1962 (EL)

HIGHLIGHTS

Albion v Oxford
Still very tight throughout the league, 4 posters called the correct score, WBA123, Titchfieldbaggie, Nilocrm and Prando, all 50 points to the good
13 others predicted the correct result


FGS..No takers for the fgs plus bonus?Oxford own goal

Next up is Frank Lampard?s Coventry, after the international break

[stargazer_1962]

How tedious

[baggieal]

How tedious

I agree and Bomber does all this in his own time which is one of the best parts of the forum.
Respect to him!

[On Balance]

How tedious

Agreed. If one is unable to accept criticism then what is the point of these forums. I supported a poster, who has now left this forum other than they still do the prediction game.

I have not called people disgusting names etc. I made a comment that a post was immature. I did not state the was poster was so. There is a significant difference.

I was astonished and disappointed I was stopped from competing in something I had been part of for three/four years.

I am not going to go on to much, other than to say that online bullying does depict that stopping a person being involved in games etc. is a pat of such behaviour.

I am calling out the person involved, they were obviously vexed by what was said, however we are all mature adults. I have been called gay, a dog turd and various other assaulting names and yet that is accepted by so many. I find quite strange on board. It shows that someone who is popular can say and do as they like without any recourse.

I will not lower myself to the status of accepting being bullied by online bullying does full stop.

Standing by and supporting one is not an option for me, and I would honestly believe it would not be for you and most other posters on here.

I will keep on predicting, I wish we could draw a line and resume in a proper way going forward.

[On Balance]

I agree and Bomber does all this in his own time which is one of the best parts of the forum.
Respect to him!

It is all about anti on line bullying Al. It is as simple as that. I have not resorted to calling you names, other than Alan. You on the other hand have called me a dog turd, a homo***ual and various other names. And further, you have made libellous statements with regard to me, and you do not know me.

You fail to support your statements with facts. I respect Bomber. I do not respect liars or online bullying.

It has been along day up to the Hawthorns and back again. Six hours plus round trip. At least we got the three points today. A positive I think.

For clarity, my previous post should have read (para 5 line 1) “I am not calling out the person involved.”

As I say, it’s been a long supporting the Baggies, so I’m off to bed now.

[baggieal]

It is all about anti on line bullying Al. It is as simple as that. I have not resorted to calling you names, other than Alan. You on the other hand have called me a dog turd, a homo***ual and various other names. And further, you have made libellous statements with regard to me, and you do not know me.

You fail to support your statements with facts. I respect Bomber. I do not respect liars or online bullying.

It has been along day up to the Hawthorns and back again. Six hours plus round trip. At least we got the three points today. A positive I think.

For clarity, my previous post should have read (para 5 line 1) “I am not calling out the person involved.”

But you looked up a posters accounts on Companies House after investigating his company then suggested others could do the same.

Creepy! If that?s not bullying when it would reveal a personal address then what is! All you needed to do with Bomber was apologise so no you don?t respect him but make a continuous mockery of the match predictions hence the other poster saying your posts are tedious.

Nice three points! Didn?t go today but walked the dog near the Viaduct in the rain 😂

[On Balance]

It is all about anti on line bullying Al. It is as simple as that. I have not resorted to calling you names, other than Alan. You on the other hand have called me a dog turd, a homo***ual and various other names. And further, you have made libellous statements with regard to me, and you do not know me.

You fail to support your statements with facts. I respect Bomber. I do not respect liars or online bullying.

It has been along day up to the Hawthorns and back again. Six hours plus round trip. At least we got the three points today. A positive I think.

For clarity, my previous post should have read (para 5 line 1) ?I am not calling out the person involved.?

As I say, it?s been a long supporting the Baggies, so I?m off to bed now.

But you looked up a posters accounts on Companies House after investigating his company then suggested others could do the same.

Creepy! If that?s not bullying when it would reveal a personal address then what is! All you needed to do with Bomber was apologise so no you don?t respect him but make a continuous mockery of the match predictions hence the other poster saying your posts are tedious.

Nice three points! Didn?t go today but walked the dog near the Viaduct in the rain ��

And there you go again. The post you refer to is one where you stated a poster was wealthy and an excellent businessman. You do this often when you are defending said poster. I responded that anyone can look up a persons wealth on Companies House. They can do this if they are aware of a companies details. You then wrote that I had broken privacy laws. Companies House is open source information, so again you lied to try to make me look bad. I did not check on anyone from this site, so more lies. All I did was respond to your bragging on another posters behalf, as I did to you when you tried stabbing Boingy in the back by penning part of a post he made on another site to insinuate he was falling out with another poster, which was far from the truth. But let us be fair Al, the truth is perhaps something alien to you, because you scribe so many untruths on here which may stop people posting.

As I have said, you have tried to bully me off this site. You will not succeed. You have made allegations time and time again about me which I have asked you to evidence. You do not do so because you are unable to because you fabricate things to make yourself look clever. You present lies as the truth. Now that is creepy.

Viaduct does not post on here. Boingy only posts on the prediction league. There are others, I guess, that no longer post on here. Ask yourself why.
Take a look at your last sentence. Another untruth.


Bully traits.

* Ringleader - Initiating and leading the bullying but not always the person ?doing? the bullying.
* Target - The person at whom the bullying is aimed. Assistant - Actively involved in ?doing? the bullying but not leading it
* Reinforcer - Supports the bullying, might laugh or encourage other people to ?collude?
* Defender - Stands up for someone being bullied. Knows that bullying is wrong and feels confident enough to do something about it.
* Outsider/Bystander - Ignores any bullying and doesn?t want to get involved.


On line bullying.
* Exclusion ? intentionally leaving someone out of group messages, online apps, gaming sites and other online engagement.

I leave you with that Al.

[baggieal]

And there you go again. The post you refer to is one where you stated a poster was wealthy and an excellent businessman. You do this often when you are defending said poster. I responded that anyone can look up a persons wealth on Companies House. They can do this if they are aware of a companies details. You then wrote that I had broken privacy laws. Companies House is open source information, so again you lied to try to make me look bad. I did not check on anyone from this site, so more lies. All I did was respond to your bragging on another posters behalf, as I did to you when you tried stabbing Boingy in the back by penning part of a post he made on another site to insinuate he was falling out with another poster, which was far from the truth. But let us be fair Al, the truth is perhaps something alien to you, because you scribe so many untruths on here which may stop people posting.

As I have said, you have tried to bully me off this site. You will not succeed. You have made allegations time and time again about me which I have asked you to evidence. You do not do so because you are unable to because you fabricate things to make yourself look clever. You present lies as the truth. Now that is creepy.

Viaduct does not post on here. Boingy only posts on the prediction league. There are others, I guess, that no longer post on here. Ask yourself why.
Take a look at your last sentence. Another untruth.


Bully traits.

* Ringleader - Initiating and leading the bullying but not always the person ?doing? the bullying.
* Target - The person at whom the bullying is aimed. Assistant - Actively involved in ?doing? the bullying but not leading it
* Reinforcer - Supports the bullying, might laugh or encourage other people to ?collude?
* Defender - Stands up for someone being bullied. Knows that bullying is wrong and feels confident enough to do something about it.
* Outsider/Bystander - Ignores any bullying and doesn?t want to get involved.


On line bullying.
* Exclusion ? intentionally leaving someone out of group messages, online apps, gaming sites and other online engagement.

I leave you with that Al.

Yawn yawn! Who banned you from the match predictions and ask yourself why! You then continuously make yourself look tedious ( another posters words ) by taking the p iss out of the excellent work Bomber does by your league table! Have many posters defended you and asked for your reinstatement? Zero and there you have it!

Thought Collyer had some decent touches yesterday!

[On Balance]

Yawn yawn! Who banned you from the match predictions and ask yourself why! You then continuously make yourself look tedious ( another posters words ) by taking the p iss out of the excellent work Bomber does by your league table! Have many posters defended you and asked for your reinstatement? Zero and there you have it!

Thought Collyer had some decent touches yesterday!

Bomber banned me because he supported you stabbing Boingy in the back and then referred to one word I had incorrectly spelt in my response, doing to me exactly what your good friend Baggieblood did to Soulman, which caused a brilliant poster to leave. I stated and evidenced that to Bomber by calling his post immature. Not him, just his post, given the circumstances witnessed on here only a few days previously. Like you say often, if you are unable to accept criticism or are easily offended then you should not be on this site.

You exclaimed on this forum, obviously unable to hide your joy, when Bomber said I was unable to participate in the prediction league. To that I refer you to the last sentence of my previous post.

On line bullying.

* Exclusion ? intentionally leaving someone out of group messages, online apps, gaming sites and other online engagement.


Explain how I have taken the urine out of Bombers excellent work. I simply refuse to be bullied by you or anyone else.

Not many poster defended me. I refer you to no 5 of my previous post the traits of a bully.

* Outsider/Bystander - Ignores any bullying and doesn?t want to get involved.

You just make it worse for yourself by digging a massive hole with so many untruths, compounded by more when you should perhaps stop digging.

And you still fail to evidence any of the lies you have posted in regard to me. Why, I would suggest because you are unable to. Show me I am wrong and provide the evidence to why you said I was homo***ual, why I micromanage staff, how you know I am Viaduct (I am not of course) and why you called me a dog turd.

Enjoy your day. I will mine.

[Bombers right foot]

Bomber banned me because he supported you stabbing Boingy in the back and then referred to one word I had incorrectly spelt in my response, doing to me exactly what your good friend Baggieblood did to Soulman, which caused a brilliant poster to leave. I stated and evidenced that to Bomber by calling his post immature. Not him, just his post, given the circumstances witnessed on here only a few days previously. Like you say often, if you are unable to accept criticism or are easily offended then you should not be on this site.

You exclaimed on this forum, obviously unable to hide your joy, when Bomber said I was unable to participate in the prediction league. To that I refer you to the last sentence of my previous post.

On line bullying.

* Exclusion ? intentionally leaving someone out of group messages, online apps, gaming sites and other online engagement.


Explain how I have taken the urine out of Bombers excellent work. I simply refuse to be bullied by you or anyone else.

Not many poster defended me. I refer you to no 5 of my previous post the traits of a bully.

* Outsider/Bystander - Ignores any bullying and doesn?t want to get involved.

You just make it worse for yourself by digging a massive hole with so many untruths, compounded by more when you should perhaps stop digging.

And you still fail to evidence any of the lies you have posted in regard to me. Why, I would suggest because you are unable to. Show me I am wrong and provide the evidence to why you said I was homo***ual, why I micromanage staff, how you know I am Viaduct (I am not of course) and why you called me a dog turd.

Enjoy your day. I will mine.

This is my one and only response to you ever, you were banned because you were seen as a troublemaker and I didn?t like your posts where I was involved, it?s time to stop and move on, however carrying on with your tedious posts of the Prediction League will only see you banned next season as well

[On Balance]

This is my one and only response to you ever, you were banned because you were seen as a troublemaker and I didn?t like your posts where I was involved, it?s time to stop and move on, however carrying on with your tedious posts of the Prediction League will only see you banned next season as well

Hi Bomber,

Could we just pause and rewind for a moment. Bomber I have no issue with you. We disagreed on a thread which Baggieal initiated regarding Boingy, (Who I have never met and not is a friend of mine, he is simply another poster on a forum) to which I responded directly to Al saying what he wrote was uncalled for.

I would be grateful if you could point to which post you are referring to which you did not like. I can only think you refer to the thread I mention above, where Al posted that Boingy had fallen out with another on the new site, and posted only part of that thread on this site. What I disliked with the initial post was that Al, for whatever reason, posted only a single sentence of the post from the other site, which failed to provide a true reflection of the whole thread. Boingy and the other poster did not fall out. Indeed it was quite the opposite.

I believe Al was wrong to post the comments as he did. It was a fake assessment of the situation and I simply said it was uncalled for. Al responded and you followed in support of him on the Mason thread of the 19/09/25.

In one of your responses on that thread, you made three points and in my response to those three points, I responded and answered them all. In none of those posts on that thread did I use inappropriate language or make any inappropriate comments about yourself or other posters. Unfortunately that cannot be said of others, as I have been called vile and disgusting names on here and had untruthful reference made about my ***uality and my professionalism in the workplace.

In your thread of the 22/09/25, the one headed “Its goodbye from me,” let us be honest, you did get a little personal and ended by making a comment with regard to a misspelling I had made on a previous thread. I consider that reference inappropriate given the circumstances under which Soulman decided to stop posting only a few days earlier, when Baggieblood had made similar comments regarding Soulmans posts. I, along with others on here, made reference to Bloods comments as I have done so when another poster made disgusting comments aimed at Leicester. I will give Blood some credit, he did apologise. I did respond to your post and wrote “Not the most mature response Bomber.” I made it quite clear in the post I was referring to the Soulman situation and that my response was not about you personally, it was simply about the content of your post.

I will end by going back to where I started, and I understand you have stated above, it is your one and only response. However, in the interest of fairness, I would be grateful if you would highlight any post where I have been disrespectful to you, used inappropriate language or made statements regarding your personal life etc. If you do, I will apologise unreservedly and I would stop posting on the prediction league. If you are unable or do not wish to respond, then I accept that. In either case I would hope you do read this post and accept it in the spirit it is intended, reflect on its content and understand it is a genuine effort to clear up and clarify any misunderstandings. In either case, I would hope we could at least consider rewinding back to before the Baggial’s initial post and draw a line under it.

[baggieal]

Hi Bomber,

Could we just pause and rewind for a moment. Bomber I have no issue with you. We disagreed on a thread which Baggieal initiated regarding Boingy, (Who I have never met and not is a friend of mine, he is simply another poster on a forum) to which I responded directly to Al saying what he wrote was uncalled for.

I would be grateful if you could point to which post you are referring to which you did not like. I can only think you refer to the thread I mention above, where Al posted that Boingy had fallen out with another on the new site, and posted only part of that thread on this site. What I disliked with the initial post was that Al, for whatever reason, posted only a single sentence of the post from the other site, which failed to provide a true reflection of the whole thread. Boingy and the other poster did not fall out. Indeed it was quite the opposite.

I believe Al was wrong to post the comments as he did. It was a fake assessment of the situation and I simply said it was uncalled for. Al responded and you followed in support of him on the Mason thread of the 19/09/25.

In one of your responses on that thread, you made three points and in my response to those three points, I responded and answered them all. In none of those posts on that thread did I use inappropriate language or make any inappropriate comments about yourself or other posters. Unfortunately that cannot be said of others, as I have been called vile and disgusting names on here and had untruthful reference made about my ***uality and my professionalism in the workplace.

In your thread of the 22/09/25, the one headed “Its goodbye from me,” let us be honest, you did get a little personal and ended by making a comment with regard to a misspelling I had made on a previous thread. I consider that reference inappropriate given the circumstances under which Soulman decided to stop posting only a few days earlier, when Baggieblood had made similar comments regarding Soulmans posts. I, along with others on here, made reference to Bloods comments as I have done so when another poster made disgusting comments aimed at Leicester. I will give Blood some credit, he did apologise. I did respond to your post and wrote “Not the most mature response Bomber.” I made it quite clear in the post I was referring to the Soulman situation and that my response was not about you personally, it was simply about the content of your post.

I will end by going back to where I started, and I understand you have stated above, it is your one and only response. However, in the interest of fairness, I would be grateful if you would highlight any post where I have been disrespectful to you, used inappropriate language or made statements regarding your personal life etc. If you do, I will apologise unreservedly and I would stop posting on the prediction league. If you are unable or do not wish to respond, then I accept that. In either case I would hope you do read this post and accept it in the spirit it is intended, reflect on its content and understand it is a genuine effort to clear up and clarify any misunderstandings. In either case, I would hope we could at least consider rewinding back to before the Baggial’s initial post and draw a line under it.

You twist everything to your narrative. This actually started by Bomber taking offence because Boingy started it by making a disgusting comment about a person must be on drugs if they didn?t see what he did against Bournemouth when we were simply outplayed. Bomber then quite rightly made a point of saying the rose tinted specs had started on the other forum. He was right. Not in any bad way but clearly Steve who i know in person disagrees with must footballing comments made by Boingy. Like me - Steve spends money by going to the matches, Your comments to Bomber were uncalled for and he quite rightly banned you. Consider this Bomber puts in a lot of work on those match predictions so even the slightest uncalled for comment would niggle him as it would anyone else doing that job for the benefit of the board.

You twisted the information about Mick. You clearly did some background work to find his company on Companies House and made a comment that his company was not doing as well as he made out. You then referenced others could check. Not nice when private information is on Companies House such as personal information and only those who would really want the information and know the Company would go looking ie credit agencies etc. Mick knows a lot of posters on this board and don?t you think he?s told them? Well he has!

You have always had an agenda OB to cause trouble and you think your clever but take it from me - your not! Your tedious match prediction scores have bored most posters and this has been a complete p iss take of Bombers work!

[On Balance]

You twist everything to your narrative. This actually started by Bomber taking offence because Boingy started it by making a disgusting comment about a person must be on drugs if they didn?t see what he did against Bournemouth when we were simply outplayed. Bomber then quite rightly made a point of saying the rose tinted specs had started on the other forum. He was right. Not in any bad way but clearly Steve who i know in person disagrees with must footballing comments made by Boingy. Like me - Steve spends money by going to the matches, Your comments to Bomber were uncalled for and he quite rightly banned you. Consider this Bomber puts in a lot of work on those match predictions so even the slightest uncalled for comment would niggle him as it would anyone else doing that job for the benefit of the board.

You twisted the information about Mick. You clearly did some background work to find his company on Companies House and made a comment that his company was not doing as well as he made out. You then referenced others could check. Not nice when private information is on Companies House such as personal information and only those who would really want the information and know the Company would go looking ie credit agencies etc. Mick knows a lot of posters on this board and don?t you think he?s told them? Well he has!


You have always had an agenda OB to cause trouble and you think your clever but take it from me - your not! Your tedious match prediction scores have bored most posters and this has been a complete p iss take of Bombers work!

Another post Al, where you absolutely lie and twist things to suit your own agenda. I never for one moment thought you would accept my post, which was for Bomber, for what it was.

You keep suggesting I should apologise. I have provided you with so many opportunities to apologise for calling me a homo***ual and my wife a man, questioning my work ethics and calling me a dog turd. Have you apologised, no.

Why would anyone make an unsupported comment about another persons ***uality unless they wanted to gain the upper hand. One who uses such terminology indicates they think it funny or that a homo***ual person is there to be made fun of. It was used as a put down. Homophobia is still rife and using that on a public forum by anyone is disgraceful and wrong.

You have lied and continue to do so, twisting the truth of what I said in regards to Michd and the reference I made to companies house. It is fabricated lies. We all know the last time Mick posted on here. He may well come back and support you, however, the post is still there and the smilies stopped and so did Mick posting on here. I wish he would come back.

You may have support on here, it is certainly support of a minority and the silence of most is quite defaming. As I pointed out to you before regarding a bullies traits. Most people remain silent, not wishing to be involved.

You should perhaps listen to the Sarah Cox interview with Jeremy Vine last week. Perhaps read her book. You may recognise some traits of the people who subjected her to bullying.



The post was for Bomber, in an effort to close the issue, like I said above, I never thought you would understand that.

Below are traits of bullying. If others support you then good luck.

Bully traits.

* Ringleader - Initiating and leading the bullying but not always the person “doing” the bullying.
* Target - The person at whom the bullying is aimed. Assistant - Actively involved in “doing” the bullying but not leading it
* Reinforcer - Supports the bullying, might laugh or encourage other people to “collude.”
* Defender - Stands up for someone being bullied. Knows that bullying is wrong and feels confident enough to do something about it.
* Outsider/Bystander - Ignores any bullying and doesn’t want to get involved.


On line bullying.
* Exclusion – intentionally leaving someone out of group messages, online apps, gaming sites and other online engagement.

[baggieal]

Another post Al, where you absolutely lie and twist things to suit your own agenda. I never for one moment thought you would accept my post, which was for Bomber, for what it was.

You keep suggesting I should apologise. I have provided you with so many opportunities to apologise for calling me a homo***ual and my wife a man, questioning my work ethics and calling me a dog turd. Have you apologised, no.

Why would anyone make an unsupported comment about another persons ***uality unless they wanted to gain the upper hand. One who uses such terminology indicates they think it funny or that a homo***ual person is there to be made fun of. It was used as a put down. Homophobia is still rife and using that on a public forum by anyone is disgraceful and wrong.

You have lied and continue to do so, twisting the truth of what I said in regards to Michd and the reference I made to companies house. It is fabricated lies. We all know the last time Mick posted on here. He may well come back and support you, however, the post is still there and the smilies stopped and so did Mick posting on here. I wish he would come back.

You may have support on here, it is certainly support of a minority and the silence of most is quite defaming. As I pointed out to you before regarding a bullies traits. Most people remain silent, not wishing to be involved.

You should perhaps listen to the Sarah Cox interview with Jeremy Vine last week. Perhaps read her book. You may recognise some traits of the people who subjected her to bullying.



The post was for Bomber, in an effort to close the issue, like I said above, I never thought you would understand that.

Below are traits of bullying. If others support you then good luck.

Bully traits.

* Ringleader - Initiating and leading the bullying but not always the person “doing” the bullying.
* Target - The person at whom the bullying is aimed. Assistant - Actively involved in “doing” the bullying but not leading it
* Reinforcer - Supports the bullying, might laugh or encourage other people to “collude.”
* Defender - Stands up for someone being bullied. Knows that bullying is wrong and feels confident enough to do something about it.
* Outsider/Bystander - Ignores any bullying and doesn’t want to get involved.


On line bullying.
* Exclusion – intentionally leaving someone out of group messages, online apps, gaming sites and other online engagement.

Some posters know what you said about Mick as he?s personally told them. Looking up personal information on Companies House like you did after doing some digging of his company crossed the line. Creepy and sad!

You have constantly taken the p iss out of me calling me Alan even though another poster referenced he?s certainly not Alan but you continued. Boingy referencing drugs crossed the line which was why Bomber flew at him. For the record I detest drugs as someone close in our family overdosed and died. To call someone who spends money at matches and they don?t agree with your view on drugs - don?t you think that?s overstepping the mark?

On a recent post someone who comes on here too causing trouble called me racist blah blah and suggested I use the - I have black friends card blah blah.

I laughed it off and unlike you with Mick and could have crossed the line retaliated and got personal - I actually know the full identities of this person and what he does with the wife. Would I use personal information like you did? No not in a million!

The fact you continued to take the p iss out of Bombers predictions tells a story in itself about you!

I honestly think you need help as clearly you have issues or demons.

Call me Alan all you like if that?s what floats your boat.

PS - since Mick left the forum I must have done about six matches with him and both families are very close. Funny you then say a bit of banter between us made him leave the post. He eats s hit like I said and he probably thinks I drink too much 😂

The magic word to Bomber would have been SORRY but up until this week you have continued to take the p iss out of him week after week so one poster called you tedious and since your dictionary pops out time and time again.

Watch Celebs Race Around the World this Thursday and refocus your energy 😛