Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Epstein.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Epstein.

    With all this furore regarding Epstein the one element that I just do not understand is why these victims do not name the individuals involved. The only reason that I can come up with is that they have been handsomely paid off or that they are scared witless for their safety.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Leicesterbaggie View Post
    With all this furore regarding Epstein the one element that I just do not understand is why these victims do not name the individuals involved. The only reason that I can come up with is that they have been handsomely paid off or that they are scared witless for their safety.
    Most of the high profile victims would have been paid off so part of the agreement is non disclosure going forward. See below in terms of Andrew Mountbatten where nothing at the time was proven;

    In February 2022, Prince Andrew reached an out-of-court settlement with Virginia Giuffre to end her civil ***ual assault lawsuit, reportedly paying over ?12 million ($16 million+), which included a donation to her *** trafficking charity.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Leicesterbaggie View Post
      With all this furore regarding Epstein the one element that I just do not understand is why these victims do not name the individuals involved. The only reason that I can come up with is that they have been handsomely paid off or that they are scared witless for their safety.
      Agree with you Leics. Difficult to see any other reasons and we know -as Al has said-that some NDA settlements have already been made. The whole thing is so far away from the "transparency" that Trump and his apologists like Katie Zacharia are pushing. On one hand, some of the victims have had their photographs published in the released files against their wishes and on the other, released e-mails of suspicious and (at best) ***ist content have had the names of Epstein's correspondents redacted. I Wonder why?🤔

      The breadth of Epstein's networking amongst the world's rich and powerful was so wide that I am sure that it took in some who may not have been aware of his activities and who were not guilty of any wrong doing themselves but they won't like any damage by association. I honestly cannot see us getting any real transparency over the Epstein files for some years to come-and certainly not under the presidency of DJT.

      Comment


      • #4
        What was Andrew Mountbatten doing on all fours - that?s what I want to know?

        Comment


        • #5
          Was woodlandwolf in the files??

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by phild View Post
            Was woodlandwolf in the files??
            🫣

            Comment


            • #7
              What would Joe Public get if they gave away highly confidential and sensitive government information! Surprised Charles is not more vocal in him testifying under oath and throwing him out of Sandringham too!

              Comment


              • #8
                What about Trumpety Trumps, now it has been revealed he has lied about not knowing Epstein?s perversions. The files provide evidence from 2006 that Trump stated everyone knew about it.

                Oh dear oh dear.

                Comment

                Working...
                X