Tweet
Originally posted by On Balance
View Post
I respond, as I have done before, breaking down each untruth into the paragraphs as they are made in BaggieAl?s post.
1. (Ref Para 1 of your post). I have not questioned your relationship with Mick, other than to say his last post was in response to you, when you appeared to have a differing opinion on the fat jab. It ended with these last two sentences.
Mickd said Cheers for that AL??..I know where I stand with you now. [Sic].
You ended the thread saying, With personal comments - people bite back! You went too far!
All the best.
There were no emojis in Micks final responses.
2.) Ref Para 2 of your post). For the record Al, I did not call Bomber immature. Read verbatim below what I wrote. I clearly wrote that his post was not mature. A huge difference between calling Bomber immature and his post immature.
Here is what I wrote in full.
Not the most mature of posts Bomber. I recall only a week or so ago that you, I and many other posters were appalled by Baggiebloods post regarding Soulmans spelling and yet here we are again. (Predict text often has a lot to do with misspelt words).
Like you said in your previous post, we are all allowed to our opinions. I did not revert to name calling, I simply pointed out how, what you had posted, made little sense and was quite humorous in my mind. (I got it right this time if that was the spelling you were referring too).
Seriously, I am sorry you are unable to accept criticism and I hope you do reconsider regarding posting on here. I find it difficult to understand why you found my previous post so bad. We all have to accept criticism and as you dissected what I had written I only responded respectfully to your post.
As I say I hope you reconsider Bomber and continue posting. If not I wish you all the best.
In Bombers post, the final sentence is what I found insensitive given what had occurred only a few days previous.
In that same paragraph you distort the truth when you write I pleaded with Bomber to restore me to the prediction league. I only asked him to reconsider. That is a long way off of pleading.
Calling out someone over a misspelling was inappropriate. Be honest here Al, have you ever apologised for calling me a dog turd, for suggesting I was homo***ual and for all the other times you have called me names, which included the use of the C, F and P names?
Your final sentence in Paragraph two, is quite amusing where you suggest I micro manage. Again you are reduced to make defamatory remarks and present it as fact all in order to shore up your lies.
3. (Ref Para 3 of your post). So many untruths in this one paragraph. I do post and have started posts. I recall the one regarding Holidays which I started. I said we were going for two weeks to Malaga in Spain. Do you recall your snide comment about Malaga. I did not respond to that. I waited until we had returned and indicated why and who we went with, proving a less fortunate family with a two week holiday. Did you respond with an apology. No.
I will explain why perhaps I do not post as often as you.
i. I still work and have a very busy workload. Therefore, I am not online all day.
ii. I do not have opinions on everything.
iii. I tend to shy away from posts that knock players from the team I support, particularly if the post refers to them in an unsavoury way. I rarely post on political matters for the same reason.
vi. I was unaware that I had to make or start a given number of posts to be accepted on the forum.
4. (Ref Para?s 4 to 7 in your post). The link below refers to the post you refer to in paragraph four. Again you only post a little of a conversation. The post of the 1st September 2023, referred to the transfer window. On post 39 a particular vile post appeared which was off topic.
I found their description of what they would do with Pippa Middletons underwear unpleasant. It is a distasteful, unpleasant and disgusting habit and to go O/T on a public forum, one which women and young people have access to, is utterly out of order.
When challenged by them both, I did not respond by calling them vile names. I simply pointed out I found the whole thing disgusting.
To put it into context below is the complete thread it starts at post 39.
5. (Ref para 8 and 9 in your post). You admit you made a mistake regarding which post you stated I had offended Mickd. Please direct me to the post you claim I made, what you say was offensive etc. and say caused Mick to leave.
I do recall making a comment about Companies House. I did not name anyone or post a link. I simply said anyone can access Companies House and see how successful a business is. I did not divulge any information personal to Mickd, therefore once more you lie when you stated I had divulged private information.
You said, and I quote. The thread was deleted and you made a reference to a person?s company which was personal as this breaches privacy unless of course shared by the said person. Would you object to a reference about anything personal regarding you which could identify you to all and sundry? I think not as would anyone! [Sic]
Companies House is open source, explain how open source information breaches privacy legislation. You likely will not explain because it does not break any privacy legislation. Your lies do not stand up to scrutiny.
For the record, I have never suggested Mickd is not a good businessman.
You suggest I should leave this forum. If I was to leave I would be bowing down to a bully. How many people have left I wonder, because they have been bullied.
Below is a link to a thread where you bully two posters. I only came across as a result of a post from Baggie Smudge on last weekends prediction league.
It starts at post 15 by WBA123, your response is at 18. No offensive name calling was used up until your post at 18.
Link
In your final sentence you suggest I think I am clever. I am likely no more clever than you. I simply have morals and standards which I try very hard to not let slip.
Earlier last week, Ryan Tubrity, a radio presenter on Virgin Radio, said this about one of the best bits of advice he was given by somebody-
Never advertise your ignorance. If you are going to engage in a conversation make sure you do the research first.
1. (Ref Para 1 of your post). I have not questioned your relationship with Mick, other than to say his last post was in response to you, when you appeared to have a differing opinion on the fat jab. It ended with these last two sentences.
Mickd said Cheers for that AL??..I know where I stand with you now. [Sic].
You ended the thread saying, With personal comments - people bite back! You went too far!
All the best.
There were no emojis in Micks final responses.
2.) Ref Para 2 of your post). For the record Al, I did not call Bomber immature. Read verbatim below what I wrote. I clearly wrote that his post was not mature. A huge difference between calling Bomber immature and his post immature.
Here is what I wrote in full.
Not the most mature of posts Bomber. I recall only a week or so ago that you, I and many other posters were appalled by Baggiebloods post regarding Soulmans spelling and yet here we are again. (Predict text often has a lot to do with misspelt words).
Like you said in your previous post, we are all allowed to our opinions. I did not revert to name calling, I simply pointed out how, what you had posted, made little sense and was quite humorous in my mind. (I got it right this time if that was the spelling you were referring too).
Seriously, I am sorry you are unable to accept criticism and I hope you do reconsider regarding posting on here. I find it difficult to understand why you found my previous post so bad. We all have to accept criticism and as you dissected what I had written I only responded respectfully to your post.
As I say I hope you reconsider Bomber and continue posting. If not I wish you all the best.
In Bombers post, the final sentence is what I found insensitive given what had occurred only a few days previous.
In that same paragraph you distort the truth when you write I pleaded with Bomber to restore me to the prediction league. I only asked him to reconsider. That is a long way off of pleading.
Calling out someone over a misspelling was inappropriate. Be honest here Al, have you ever apologised for calling me a dog turd, for suggesting I was homo***ual and for all the other times you have called me names, which included the use of the C, F and P names?
Your final sentence in Paragraph two, is quite amusing where you suggest I micro manage. Again you are reduced to make defamatory remarks and present it as fact all in order to shore up your lies.
3. (Ref Para 3 of your post). So many untruths in this one paragraph. I do post and have started posts. I recall the one regarding Holidays which I started. I said we were going for two weeks to Malaga in Spain. Do you recall your snide comment about Malaga. I did not respond to that. I waited until we had returned and indicated why and who we went with, proving a less fortunate family with a two week holiday. Did you respond with an apology. No.
I will explain why perhaps I do not post as often as you.
i. I still work and have a very busy workload. Therefore, I am not online all day.
ii. I do not have opinions on everything.
iii. I tend to shy away from posts that knock players from the team I support, particularly if the post refers to them in an unsavoury way. I rarely post on political matters for the same reason.
vi. I was unaware that I had to make or start a given number of posts to be accepted on the forum.
4. (Ref Para?s 4 to 7 in your post). The link below refers to the post you refer to in paragraph four. Again you only post a little of a conversation. The post of the 1st September 2023, referred to the transfer window. On post 39 a particular vile post appeared which was off topic.
I found their description of what they would do with Pippa Middletons underwear unpleasant. It is a distasteful, unpleasant and disgusting habit and to go O/T on a public forum, one which women and young people have access to, is utterly out of order.
When challenged by them both, I did not respond by calling them vile names. I simply pointed out I found the whole thing disgusting.
To put it into context below is the complete thread it starts at post 39.
5. (Ref para 8 and 9 in your post). You admit you made a mistake regarding which post you stated I had offended Mickd. Please direct me to the post you claim I made, what you say was offensive etc. and say caused Mick to leave.
I do recall making a comment about Companies House. I did not name anyone or post a link. I simply said anyone can access Companies House and see how successful a business is. I did not divulge any information personal to Mickd, therefore once more you lie when you stated I had divulged private information.
You said, and I quote. The thread was deleted and you made a reference to a person?s company which was personal as this breaches privacy unless of course shared by the said person. Would you object to a reference about anything personal regarding you which could identify you to all and sundry? I think not as would anyone! [Sic]
Companies House is open source, explain how open source information breaches privacy legislation. You likely will not explain because it does not break any privacy legislation. Your lies do not stand up to scrutiny.
For the record, I have never suggested Mickd is not a good businessman.
You suggest I should leave this forum. If I was to leave I would be bowing down to a bully. How many people have left I wonder, because they have been bullied.
Below is a link to a thread where you bully two posters. I only came across as a result of a post from Baggie Smudge on last weekends prediction league.
It starts at post 15 by WBA123, your response is at 18. No offensive name calling was used up until your post at 18.
Link
In your final sentence you suggest I think I am clever. I am likely no more clever than you. I simply have morals and standards which I try very hard to not let slip.
Earlier last week, Ryan Tubrity, a radio presenter on Virgin Radio, said this about one of the best bits of advice he was given by somebody-
Never advertise your ignorance. If you are going to engage in a conversation make sure you do the research first.
What a load of complete bollox. If you do work, then you can't be that busy to write chapter and verse to bore everyone on here. Myself an Mick communicate almost daily but we have a differing of opinion on lots of things in life which is natural.
On your previous thread you could have quite easily referenced Mick's company ie it was not on the Huw Edwards thread but on another post. You failed to do this because it's now hitting you in the face big time.
I swear on my life and would never say this - your words were " a quick search on Companies House showed that Mick's Company wan't as successful as what was made out". No his Company name was not mentioned but the fact you investigated this by yourself and then looked up the Company is creepy and that's what unhinged Mick and enough was enough for him. By making these comments you clearly know nothing about financials as a 1 million pound turnover company can be more successful profit wise than a company that turns over 20 million. I don't blame Mick for leaving and other posters on this forum know the facts as Mick either has spoken to them in person or he's friends with many on FB. Looking up a posters personal information after digging is of poor taste and yes you did trash Mick because you referenced that his Company was not as Successful which had been made out. How the hell do you know? Profits of a company don't always show on Companies House Accounts. I know as I have two Companies - have you looked these up too as wouldn't surprise me! Words fail me over this!
Never known Bomber to be upset and your response was shockingly poor when he works hard on match predictions. To use the words not mature or immature is playing around with words and you bullied him off the site. No wonder he banned you from match predictions but still you try and spoil it for everyone by saying you will still post your predictions. It's up to Bomber but I hope he deletes you from the league table and yes in his words - you are a trouble causer!
In terms of Boingy which Bomber referenced then that was up to him and yes it was hypocrisy. I fail to see why anyone would make digs about this site if they are on another site but still it goes on. You failed to jump on the word "Arseholes" used by another poster on that site. Why as this was very personal? We all know why though!
You keep sending these long posts but most on the forum know Mick and already heard his side so I ask you this?
Who would posters like to see on the site you or Mick?
How many posters backed you up when Bomber banned you from predictions? None!
I know you are no cleverer than myself and this clearly shows! You try and be smart and hijack posts and posters
( example in last response ) called you out.
In summary only a sad individual would try and piece together information and dig deep to find a Company name then look it up on Companies House of another poster. Very creepy ( Mick's words )!
run out of energy in the face of some people and resort to one word responses, hence my monikor amongst colleagues was for a long while Father Jack. ( Dont quite know why as I don't normally spill my food down my front and can't recall ever retorting "arse" or "nuns" - though there was another 4 letter word beginning with C I may have had a penchant for....😂
Comment