Don't let the facts discourage you.
https://science.feedback.org/review/...ted-slay-news/
Printable View
Don't let the facts discourage you.
https://science.feedback.org/review/...ted-slay-news/
When Googling slaynews, the top search result is a list of fake news sites on Wikipedia.
Obviously Wiki should be treated with care, but a result like that should at lease cause someone to question what a 'news' site says as opposed to accepting it in a sheep like manner.
Facts - from an organisation sponsored by the following...
https://science.feedback.org/partners-funders-donors/
If you feel these people are trustworthy, good for you.
These people are controlling the agenda behind the scenes, and I don't trust them.
Obviously we don't know whether the posts on X are true or false but this fascinated me.
https://x.com/JamieAA_Again/status/1838916516089102393
But we must follow it up with a trusted source
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/2...th-soft-drinks
But then a very trusted government based source.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372450/
We could all be right XD
It's well known that positive lateral flow test results could be spoofed with an acidic solution, but what's your point? What's that got to do with vaccines or, indeed, positive lateral flow tests obtained with a nose swab?
I'm glad you alerted me to their sources of funding -
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
In 2023, Science Feedback contributed to the NODES project, which developed a mechanism to analyze and monitor the spread of disinformation narratives. This project has received funding from the European Commission under grant agreement CNECT/2022/5162608.
In 2024, Science Feedback contributed to the FactCRICIS project, which aims to improve the capacities of European fact-checking organisations to tackle crisis situations.
Thanks!