O/T Covid Vaccine mRNA

[mygiddypant]

https://slaynews.com/news/study-mill...d-vaxxed-kids/

Don't let the facts discourage you.

https://science.feedback.org/review/...ted-slay-news/

[KerrAvon]

When Googling slaynews, the top search result is a list of fake news sites on Wikipedia.

Obviously Wiki should be treated with care, but a result like that should at lease cause someone to question what a 'news' site says as opposed to accepting it in a sheep like manner.

[Eternal Optimist]

Don't let the facts discourage you.

https://science.feedback.org/review/...ted-slay-news/

Facts - from an organisation sponsored by the following...

https://science.feedback.org/partners-funders-donors/

If you feel these people are trustworthy, good for you.

These people are controlling the agenda behind the scenes, and I don't trust them.

[Eternal Optimist]

...as opposed to accepting it in a sheep like manner.

Quote of the Day.

[frogmiller]

Obviously we don't know whether the posts on X are true or false but this fascinated me.

https://x.com/JamieAA_Again/status/1838916516089102393

But we must follow it up with a trusted source

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/2...th-soft-drinks

But then a very trusted government based source.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372450/

We could all be right

[KerrAvon]

It's well known that positive lateral flow test results could be spoofed with an acidic solution, but what's your point? What's that got to do with vaccines or, indeed, positive lateral flow tests obtained with a nose swab?

[KerrAvon]

Quote of the Day.

Thanks.

It fits. You clearly took no steps to check the accuracy of the link that you put up.

[frogmiller]

It's well known that positive lateral flow test results could be spoofed with an acidic solution, but what's your point? What's that got to do with vaccines or, indeed, positive lateral flow tests obtained with a nose swab?

I thought it was funny and it wasn't aimed at you!! Don't take it personally you're not that important!! It's just a flaw in the system that can be abused.

[Eternal Optimist]

Thanks.

It fits. You clearly took no steps to check the accuracy of the link that you put up.

I only investigate those items worthy of investigation I'm afraid. Any hint of vested interest instantly confirms a corrupt source.

Wait until you discover exactly how Blackrock have been making money. It'll blow your mind.

[mygiddypant]

Facts - from an organisation sponsored by the following...

https://science.feedback.org/partners-funders-donors/

If you feel these people are trustworthy, good for you.

These people are controlling the agenda behind the scenes, and I don't trust them.

I'm glad you alerted me to their sources of funding -

EUROPEAN COMMISSION
In 2023, Science Feedback contributed to the NODES project, which developed a mechanism to analyze and monitor the spread of disinformation narratives. This project has received funding from the European Commission under grant agreement CNECT/2022/5162608.

In 2024, Science Feedback contributed to the FactCRICIS project, which aims to improve the capacities of European fact-checking organisations to tackle crisis situations.

Thanks!