Freedom of speech rA, freedom of speech Surely a core plank of your political platform?? Evelyn Beatrice Hall time again.....Quote:
Originally Posted by ramAnag
Printable View
Freedom of speech rA, freedom of speech Surely a core plank of your political platform?? Evelyn Beatrice Hall time again.....Quote:
Originally Posted by ramAnag
Generally speaking, GP and I wasn’t suggesting TTR should be censored. Topically, I note that a ****ager has been banned from all football grounds for three years because of his appalling language and swearing on the train from the Peterborough match to Derby.
One wonders what old Evelyn would have said about that.
Likewise…should extremists be allowed to continue their sh1t stirring by voicing exaggeration and discriminatory opinions when they only serve to exacerbate an already volatile situation?
Fine lines…don’t claim to have the answer.
Sorry RA that's not true.Quote:
Originally Posted by ramAnag
Take the fiasco of the grooming gangs, which still goes on. Your answer to it everytime was, but but but there are White British peados as well.
Yes of course, but they are not operating in a tight catchment area, targetting vulnerable white girls only and belonging to a particular religion, from the same part of the world.
The native peado;s aren't being avoided by the social services/ councils/police either in case it causes a racial back lash.
That is the problem, stop being in denial and call out ANY PROBLEM ANYWHERE, no matter who it offends.
There is way too much cowardice in the authorities, to deal with issues caused by ethnic minorities in case it rocks the boat. If we are to be a multi cultural nation, then law/accontablity applies to all.
How bad is it, when a Muslin issue, thousands of miles away, is used a main selling point in a political campaign. Just to curry favour with Islam voters?
Obviously, Islam is more important to some, than the running of a country.
"curry favour with Islamic voters"
LOL, nice one Tricky 😄😄
flavour maybeQuote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone
1. I think you rA and TTR are talking about different problems, in fact I think you are talking about almost the exact OPPOSITE problem - If I may guess, The Rise of Islam v. The demonisation of IslamQuote:
Originally Posted by ramAnag
2. I'm not so sure, my guess is that both major parties have seen the impact a decent orator (you must admit) with the right message has in terms of voter impact. (superficially or genuine) Pro-Palestine Labour GE candidates may see this positively impacting their vote, BUT supposing more 'Workers Party' candidates spring up in other Labour held/hoped for and Gaza-sympathetic wards, the impact could be as bad as Reform might be to the Conservatives. By the way I'm told the London Mayoral Election might go the way of pro-Palestine v. Anti-ULEZ which is interesting (to me)
3. 'More carefully selected', yes better wording this time!
4. I think better debate is had by letting TTR (and those at the opposite end of the argument I guess) have their say and then try to discuss rather than just describing it as 'Muslim bashing'. I can personally support either when their POV's are based on at least a bit of fact, (I'll point out the gov.uk report TTR referred to last week which I went to the trouble of studying and it did support his line of argument, but point out also the unfounded comment from elsewhere 'There are more bad 'Christians' than Muslims', a nice bit of 'Christian bashing' to throw in the mix) and support any retort when its objective and not filled with bile.
NB picking on your messages isn't me 'picking on you' personally, your messages just have more structure which enables structured reply is all
Andy…it was you who first criticised the thread for developing into the ‘usual Islam bitchfest’…I was merely running with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy_Faber
I hadn’t for one moment thought you were ‘picking on me personally’.
I bring it up…yes, but it isn’t an answer. As I’ve said before…I have never been someone who has disputed the existence of ‘grooming gangs’, and I have come across that scenario, professionally in Derby, so I do, or did, know what I was talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds
Are, or were, there a minority of social workers/local council officials reluctant to acknowledge the problems for the reasons you suggest? I believe so…yes.
This doesn’t excuse it but I also, professionally, came across an alarming number of white, locally bred, parents and relatives who were a) complicit in not caring less what there kids were getting up to and b) involved in much more solitary s@xual exploitation of young girls including, on occasions, their own children, nieces and grandchildren.
It’s a particularly unpleasant can of worms Tricky and the biggest difference is that where the grooming gangs take a collective form the more ‘home grown’ exploiters/abusers are more likely to act alone. Doesn’t make a lot of difference to the victim but you can’t demonise one group while ignoring the other.
In other news…The i is reporting that our illustrious Government is to ‘pay Rwanda £2m per person to relocate 300 asylum seekers’.
Utter madness, but let’s keep being sidetracked by the silliness over Galloway and those pesky Muslims.
Freedom of speech is fine, but when sections of the general populace swallow the fake news and lies that's pumped out on social media, deliberately spreading stuff that whilst it may have a basis in truth does not stand up to scrutiny then we have a problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone
It was bad enough in Nazi Germany when the propaganda and "hate" stirring didn't have the benefit of the internet and AI. I do fear as to what will happen in both the Uk and US elections, with the ability of foreign actors able to spew out stuff that they know tickles the fancy of people like TTR, who are only to willing to believe stuff that suits their prejudice.
Given its clear that certain sections of the Tory party plus those ****ers at Reform will be creating division and spreading racist and bigoted rants that can only inflame things further.