Five comparisons.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ex_pat_magpie

Is that because Assley relegated us twice to win two Championship titles. That's not success. :?

---

Relegation is far from success. It's the opposite.
Winning the championship twice is real success on a lesser scale to winning the premier league or champions league but nevertheless it's a success.

Continually qualifying for Europe.... getting to quarter, semi and actual finals does (in my eyes) count as success.


Getting promoted, because you got phucking relegated and scraping by, does not!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ghostrider

I didn't at any time say I prefer it. I'm merely arguing points made about what's deemed as success.

---

Aye you didn't.You didn't deny the rest of the post either.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by waalsendmick

Continually qualifying for Europe.... getting to quarter, semi and actual finals does (in my eyes) count as success.

---

Anything can be deemed a success if your stall is set out to achieve a set goal.
The reality is, nobody gets noted as a success for holding a wooden spoon regardless.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by waalsendmick

Getting promoted, because you got phucking relegated and scraping by, does not!!!!

---

It actually does because you basically win a trophy.
But it's each to their own mindset on what is deemed as success.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Geordie1974

Aye you didn't.You didn't deny the rest of the post either.

---

The rest of the post is irrelevant.

Ffs!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ghostrider

Anything can be deemed a success if your stall is set out to achieve a set goal.
The reality is, nobody gets noted as a success for holding a wooden spoon regardless.

It actually does because you basically win a trophy.
But it's each to their own mindset on what is deemed as success.

---

Well here’s hoping you’re happy if you lift the League One trophy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by toptoon

Well here’s hoping you’re happy if you lift the League One trophy.

---

Well said.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by waalsendmick

Hall and shepherd had less debt, WITHOUT raking in £100m telly money.

Look at all the players bought by Hall, they were ALL sold at a profit or money back. By the time the shares were distributed only £15m had been spent nett.

That was on ALAN SHEARER!!!! Worth every penny.

As kev said, the debt that followed was a mortgage, a mortgage well used as it expanded the ground from 36,500 to 52,300.

We have stagnated and moved backwards ever since.

No need to research the 5 points.

If you have lived through both regimes, you would be a fool to prefer what happens now in comparison to what happened then.

Disclaimer - my answer has been fuelled by several bottles of beer.

---

so we made profit out of the likes of owen then did we
he used the adidas money we didnt have to fund deals

a debt is a debt

i cant buy a house if i cant afford it
and if i can i cant afford to go to harrods to furnish it

as i say 120 mill themn is miles more in football terms to what we had coming in then to now

we could afford 120 mill these days without mortgaging the club to the hilt

a mortgage is a debt however you look at it

if it was the mortgage on a ground we dont own why isnt it paid of
why hide it

Owen was bought long after the share issue.... if you knew your club... you would know its history.