On a related topic I just noticed that the number of posters with lbj on ignore had hit 100 XD
On a related topic I just noticed that the number of posters with lbj on ignore had hit 100 XD
That's a landmark then - the longer the season runs on and teams get 70% of the possession and lose... those 100 won't have to admit they are wrong .... We'll not on MM because they have their heads in the sand - so to speak.....lol
I suspect the penny has dropped already for many of them because some don't lack intelligence - but those guru's of the beautiful game who want Rotherham United to play the "Rotherham" way have to respect facts.
Wigan - Blackburn and now QPR are all using this tactic to good effect....
The Rotherham players couldn't "get it" - we'll for me - sack the players that didn't "get it" not the manager with the forsight to use it!
Having joined this forum of free speech I do enjoy reading others point of view - I have never found that knowledge is obtained by not looking and listening to everyone then making your own decisions....
Cam - you a moderator and present that information with a large grin!
That's a really sad indictment of MM whether you realise it or not !
IBJ..I havent blocked you as I like to read everything, and although your thinking is heavily warped towards AS it does add balance.Quote:
Originally Posted by lbj
I just would like to pick you up on something, my first post saying "were down" was on the 10th of September after our 2-2 draw with Bristol City where the stats showed that BC had 71% possession and this was in dangerous areas of the pitch, and had 35 shots at goal, it was a minor miracle that we didnt concede 8 or 9 goals, under Warne the stats have improved although the results havent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lbj
Its hard to find anybody else's point of view on here because of the volume and size of your damn posts lbj why don't you take the hint? 100 people can't be wrong. people don't take kindly to attempted brainwashing
There's no point in trying to reason with this guy Aussie he isn't willing to take on anybody else's point of view as he is convinced that despite the vast evidence to the contrary that if his beloved Stubbs was still here now we would be climbing the table and rocketing towards mid-table security.Quote:
Originally Posted by aussiemiller
He also thinks if he bangs on long enough and loudly enough about it we're all one day going to wake up and say you know what lbj, you footballing tactical genius god you, you were right all along and the rest of us are mindless simpletons who can't see that Stubbs was a talisman to a new universe far beyond the comprehension of most mere mortals.
It ain't going to happen lbj so please just change the record and post something different rather than the same repetitive nonsense over and over again.
He doesn't believe what he's writing he's just on a wind up.
I'm not even sure he's a miller tbh.
Gm - Spot on against Bristol - the team sat too deep and didn't use "the system" properly....the system is sound - if you watched QPR last night they did the same but correctly !
It takes time to get it right !
QPR players said after game that they're working hard with a new "system" ollies is using .
Reading had 72% Possession at 85 minutes. Then I switched off - but QPR won 0 - 1 ( should have been 2 )
The "system" is only one tactic in the locker but essentially it allows underdogs a chance - needs drilling into team - discipline and half decent defenders.
Aussie.....you say 100 people can't be wrong......
I'very just returned from the USA where they have elected a clown as president!
"100 people can't be wrong".....
I beg to differ....lol
A123.....I didn't invent these tactics !
It's common knowledge and Wigan - Blackburn and last night QPR mugged Reading using it....
Even the special one took Chelsea to An field and used it to good effect...
( see that match eulogised by Shearer on U-tube )....not the stupid "park the bus" version - the serious one where Shearer explains the system beautifully...and how it should be done.
Only my opinion - but backed by history and the ongoing use of it by our rivals to gain points against "better" opposition.
Simple's....
UTM.....
So that's a no to changing your tune then!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by lbj
a123.....some brilliant one liners - you crease me up.....
More or less done now to be honest....Absolutely no axe to grind !
Not AS's uncle
Not 'Good shootin Dex's' agent
Just offering my opinion on a subject I hold dear.....Rotherham United.
Bitterly disappointed though because I believe Rotherham had it right at the start if the season and I "appreciated" what they were doing. They were respecting our lowly place in the championship and trying to achieve something without breaking the bank.
That chance has gone and I can't see a credible replacement strategy.
That's my very last word on it - even I'm bored with repeating the same stuff that I thinks simple football common sense...
So YOU A123 Can have the merit badge !
You shut me up....!!!
PS: Happy New Year....UTM
lbj for what it's worth I can see a lot of what you say and I agree re the tactics and young players but you was wasting your time on here to be honest some people can only see what they want to see UTMQuote:
Originally Posted by lbj