i wont concede anything to someone who gets his feed back from the internet
come up one day ill take you
even pay your way if you want
genuine offer
Printable View
No need to take me. I was born less than 1 k from the ground and was a regular at
games before you were a mistake in your Daddy's underpants.
You are saying then that you won't concede that we aren't scoring sufficient goals. Strange one that.
So where exacstly did your stats come from as some of them were identical to mine. Honest, straight answer please
the post isnt about us we not scoring sufficent goals it was about shots on target
and if we aintt scoring and we stp them then the job is half done
from me being at the match and from teh bbc website
i dont think the bbc would lie or make it up
im sure they have a system for working out what a shot is etc
Is the BBC website not the internet too. :O
The post IS NOT ABOUT SHOTS ON TARGET you are dodging the issue. But I'll answer yours. We had 4 shots on target.
I'll remind you GOALS WIN GAMES. You should worry yourself about lack of goals instead of dodging real answers.
Newcastle United Burnley
54 Possession % 46
4 Shots on target 0
21 Shots 7
576 Touches 533
376 Passes 323
19 Tackles 14
18 Clearances 20
11 Corners 7
2 Offsides 2
4 Yellow cards 3
11 Fouls conceded 9
here you go pat
from the official premier league web site
we were beter in every department apart from the yellow cards and clearances
they had to make 18 clearances
not bad from your 6-7 shots
what official stats did you use
or tried telling us were the premier leagues official stats
look man, your way off the mark with 20 + shots
the difference is we can see there were clearly only 4 shots on goal and 6 were off target.
There were 11 attempts at a shot that were defended and didnt actually materialise as a bloody shot!!!
So we tried to shoot but actually we didnt. FFS Dubravka could try 100 shots a game, it will mean nothing unless its on target or actually goes in
https://a.imge.to/2020/03/03/yHw6vO.jpg
https://imge.to/i/yHw6vO