a much better performance

[pboromag]

You obviously won't concede the fact that we ought to be scoring sufficient goals to stay in this division then.

There are only two clubs in the Prem without a win in the last 5 games and the other one, Brighton has at least been scoring more goals than us and we have the third worst goal difference in the division which may be a foctor at the end of the season.

Those are the sort of stats you should be concerned with instead of trying to big up a very poor performance against a team which was there for the taking.

i wont concede anything to someone who gets his feed back from the internet
come up one day ill take you

even pay your way if you want

genuine offer

[ex_pat_magpie]

i wont concede anything to someone who gets his feed back from the internet
come up one day ill take you

even pay your way if you want

genuine offer

No need to take me. I was born less than 1 k from the ground and was a regular at
games before you were a mistake in your Daddy's underpants.



You are saying then that you won't concede that we aren't scoring sufficient goals. Strange one that.

So where exacstly did your stats come from as some of them were identical to mine. Honest, straight answer please

[pboromag]

the post isnt about us we not scoring sufficent goals it was about shots on target
and if we aintt scoring and we stp them then the job is half done

from me being at the match and from teh bbc website

i dont think the bbc would lie or make it up

im sure they have a system for working out what a shot is etc

[ex_pat_magpie]

the post isnt about us we not scoring sufficent goals it was about shots on target
and if we aintt scoring and we stp them then the job is half done

from me being at the match and from teh bbc website

i dont think the bbc would lie or make it up

im sure they have a system for working out what a shot is etc

Is the BBC website not the internet too.

The post IS NOT ABOUT SHOTS ON TARGET you are dodging the issue. But I'll answer yours. We had 4 shots on target.

I'll remind you GOALS WIN GAMES. You should worry yourself about lack of goals instead of dodging real answers.

[pboromag]

Newcastle United Burnley
54 Possession % 46
4 Shots on target 0
21 Shots 7
576 Touches 533
376 Passes 323
19 Tackles 14
18 Clearances 20
11 Corners 7
2 Offsides 2
4 Yellow cards 3
11 Fouls conceded 9

here you go pat
from the official premier league web site

we were beter in every department apart from the yellow cards and clearances

they had to make 18 clearances

not bad from your 6-7 shots

what official stats did you use

or tried telling us were the premier leagues official stats

[pboromag]

Is the BBC website not the internet too.

The post IS NOT ABOUT SHOTS ON TARGET you are dodging the issue. But I'll answer yours. We had 4 shots on target.

I'll remind you GOALS WIN GAMES. You should worry yourself about lack of goals instead of dodging real answers.

we didnt loose
we created chances
we held out to a team in form
we didnt concede

twist and crawl

[pboromag]

No need to take me. I was born less than 1 k from the ground and was a regular at
games before you were a mistake in your Daddy's underpants.



You are saying then that you won't concede that we aren't scoring sufficient goals. Strange one that.

So where exacstly did your stats come from as some of them were identical to mine. Honest, straight answer please

come on pat surely you would love an all expenses trip to the team you say you support

we are scoring enough to keep us out of therelegation scrap

not enough to get us into the european places

[TANYA_]

Newcastle United Burnley
54 Possession % 46
4 Shots on target 0
21 Shots 7
576 Touches 533
376 Passes 323
19 Tackles 14
18 Clearances 20
11 Corners 7
2 Offsides 2
4 Yellow cards 3
11 Fouls conceded 9

here you go pat
from the official premier league web site

we were beter in every department apart from the yellow cards and clearances

they had to make 18 clearances

not bad from your 6-7 shots

what official stats did you use

or tried telling us were the premier leagues official stats

look man, your way off the mark with 20 + shots

the difference is we can see there were clearly only 4 shots on goal and 6 were off target.
There were 11 attempts at a shot that were defended and didnt actually materialise as a bloody shot!!!

So we tried to shoot but actually we didnt. FFS Dubravka could try 100 shots a game, it will mean nothing unless its on target or actually goes in

https://a.imge.to/2020/03/03/yHw6vO.jpg
https://imge.to/i/yHw6vO

[Milburn9]

look man, your way off the mark with 20 + shots

the difference is we can see there were clearly only 4 shots on goal and 6 were off target.
There were 11 attempts at a shot that were defended and didnt actually materialise as a bloody shot!!!

So we tried to shoot but actually we didnt. FFS Dubravka could try 100 shots a game, it will mean nothing unless its on target or actually goes in

https://a.imge.to/2020/03/03/yHw6vO.jpg
https://imge.to/i/yHw6vO

FFS Tanya. How dare you come on this forum with FACTS. Facts don't work here. 😎

[TheOtherTerryMac]

look man, your way off the mark with 20 + shots

the difference is we can see there were clearly only 4 shots on goal and 6 were off target.
There were 11 attempts at a shot that were defended and didnt actually materialise as a bloody shot!!!

So we tried to shoot but actually we didnt. FFS Dubravka could try 100 shots a game, it will mean nothing unless its on target or actually goes in

https://a.imge.to/2020/03/03/yHw6vO.jpg
https://imge.to/i/yHw6vO

Never let the TRUTH get in the way of a good lie mate