Anyone see the Liverpool v Wolves game? 2 VAR decisions, 1 gave a goal to Liverpool and 1 disallowed a Wolves goal. Both seemed to really annoy the Wolves bench - I can see the point arguing it when it's just a referee decision, but what is the point when it's VAR and clearly was right (even though it may have been another very close offside).

Graham Souness has a way of stopping the marginal offside problem. He said that if the law was changed so that instead of being offside if any part of the attacker is offside, it was not offside if any part of the attacker is onside that would solve it! What is he on?! Would still be the same problem - was he marginally onside or not!

Souness said Liverpool got lucky as 2 VAR things went their way. Isn't that what VAR is supposed to do, take out the 'luck' so teams win fairly?