+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 89

Thread: King Charles III

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    35,285

    King Charles III

    That will be his title now, more on this and other title changes in the link

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59135132

    He will be addressing the nation later today

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    4,050
    Can’t wait

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,685
    Quote Originally Posted by uttis View Post
    Can’t wait
    Don't care, can't abide the royal family and everything they stand for

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    4,816
    I had a massive respect for the queen, the incredible consistency she gave, her always representing us so well, and her neutrality.

    I'm not going to pretend I think a system where the head of state is determined by who exits a specific uterus first is anything other than primitive and should be consigned to the dustbin of history and replaced with something merit-based.

    However, while I don't respect the institution, on merit the Queen did an outstanding job and will forever have my respect and it is a sad chapter to close. However that should be the end of it - we should go out on a high.

    God save the King, and Charles being that King, it just sounds and feels wrong. Everyone is free to feel how they like about being ruled, but I'll never consider myself his subject. He'll never be my king. No way in a million years should we be cancelling football matches when a multi-billionaire who has never done anything of note beyond being born privileged dies. It just costs hundreds of thousands of working people money in transport and accommodation costs.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    1,593
    Quote Originally Posted by John2 View Post
    I had a massive respect for the queen, the incredible consistency she gave, her always representing us so well, and her neutrality.

    I'm not going to pretend I think a system where the head of state is determined by who exits a specific uterus first is anything other than primitive and should be consigned to the dustbin of history and replaced with something merit-based.

    However, while I don't respect the institution, on merit the Queen did an outstanding job and will forever have my respect and it is a sad chapter to close. However that should be the end of it - we should go out on a high.

    God save the King, and Charles being that King, it just sounds and feels wrong. Everyone is free to feel how they like about being ruled, but I'll never consider myself his subject. He'll never be my king. No way in a million years should we be cancelling football matches when a multi-billionaire who has never done anything of note beyond being born privileged dies. It just costs hundreds of thousands of working people money in transport and accommodation costs.
    i'am not a royalist but the alternative is saluting President Johnson,Truss or Starmer as he/her inspects his/her troops as they march past Him/Her down the Mall. There is nothing special about Republics......history proves it. It is one aspect of our lives that Politicians can't get their grubby little hands on!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,751
    Quote Originally Posted by John2 View Post
    No way in a million years should we be cancelling football matches when a multi-billionaire who has never done anything of note beyond being born privileged dies. It just costs hundreds of thousands of working people money in transport and accommodation costs.
    I’ve just been watching about the lives that have been changed in the Princes Trust. How can you say he’s never done anything of note?

    I presume you were talking about King Charles considering you’re respect for Queen Elizabeth?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    4,816
    Quote Originally Posted by Shark27 View Post
    I presume you were talking about King Charles considering you’re respect for Queen Elizabeth?
    I have the utmost respect for Queen Elizabeth, but I won't be calling him King Charles because I don't recognise him as my king, and it would be disrespectful in a democracy to expect me to say something I don't mean no matter what any person dead or alive might think of that.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,867
    Quote Originally Posted by John2 View Post

    I'm not going to pretend I think a system where the head of state is determined by who exits a specific uterus first is anything other than primitive and should be consigned to the dustbin of history and replaced with something merit-based.
    Not normally what you left-wing types go for that is it? It's normally identity politics-based, and how many boxes the person ticks.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    4,816
    Quote Originally Posted by great_fire View Post
    Not normally what you left-wing types go for that is it? It's normally identity politics-based, and how many boxes the person ticks.
    What a daft comment. I'm all about meritocracy.

  10. #10
    Sad times, and the marking of the death of a remarkable woman.

    Yet there are still those that take her death as a chance to trumpet the me, me, me message on a football message board.

Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •