Tarky Training

[Altobelli]

Which begs 2 questions:

(1) Are we going to have a player who is not 100% positive for Burnley Football Club after his comments in the paper ?

(2) IMO he obviously wants to go to a different Club, so if he goes in January or the window after his transfer fee will perish somewhat, especially as I hear Leicester have signed the young lad Fofana, so it would seem they no longer need him leaving only the **** experts West Ham left.

And as an afterthought, who the hell agreed a 27.5 sell on clause for Tarky, if of course that figure is true.


https://www.lancs.live/sport/footbal...mpression=true

[alfinyalcabo]

I can't see Tarky not giving 100% Alto,he's not that type of guy in my opinion.

[alfinyalcabo]

We need him back though even if he only gives 80% it's better than we have at the moment.

[Norder]

.


he can stand in the box somewhere else; and no problem - we can find another to block balls...we've usually got 9 in there, though he ought to hurry up, the offers of a spot seem to be dwindling.

[Supersub6]

alto ---I think that it is 25% of the sell on fee that was agreed and not £27.5 million because that would be ludicrous!

[Altobelli]

alto ---I think that it is 25% of the sell on fee that was agreed and not £27.5 million because that would be ludicrous!

With transfers not being disclosed its hard to know what is the truth, 27.5 %, 25% even 20% and I feel we have been silly, even if we got him cheaper than what we should have as even 20% seems to be a loan shark attitude by Brentford, and Burnley for letting it happen after we always claim to be skint, if the figures are correct Sub.

[Supersub6]

With transfers not being disclosed its hard to know what is the truth, 27.5 %, 25% even 20% and I feel we have been silly, even if we got him cheaper than what we should have as even 20% seems to be a loan shark attitude by Brentford, and Burnley for letting it happen after we always claim to be skint, if the figures are correct Sub.

Agents, alto. they rule the roost and are involved because the player has one and the two clubs dealing also have their agents. It is a crazy world and works way outside normal business conventions. The way this is worked is that the agent gets his deal first time up and then gets more when his player moves again.

[barrie_burn]

Take a realistic look at the situation.Football along with everything else is in a mess,Championship,Leagues 1 & 2 and non League Clubs are in dire straits until they can get their supporters back in to the grounds but this is very unlikely in the short or medium term.The general public are aware that at the top end football is awash with money,ridiculous sums are paid for good players and salaries are obscene.The Gov't may help but the EPL,FA & Football League are going to have to get together and come up with a plan.This is likely to mean that EPL Clubs will be hard hit financially and what happens in that situation is similar to what happens in other crises,Cash is king.We have cash but we must also stay in this League.Garlick turns down bids for Tarkowski AT THE MOMENT,he helps us stay in this division and we review the position before the next transfer window.Mr Garlick has my full support,we are in unknown territory.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

With transfers not being disclosed its hard to know what is the truth, 27.5 %, 25% even 20% and I feel we have been silly, even if we got him cheaper than what we should have as even 20% seems to be a loan shark attitude by Brentford, and Burnley for letting it happen after we always claim to be skint, if the figures are correct Sub.

Tarkowski had downed tools, but the Bees held the nap hand contract wise and were quite happy to put him on gardening leave. Dyche wanted him, we paid £3.5 million and the sell-on is 27.5%, and I got that information straight from the horses mouth. NDA prevents me from naming the source , but I am 100% certain that was the case.

In retrospect it was the best we could do and Brentford are in a different league transfer nous/wise to us.

[Supersub6]

Tarkowski had downed tools, but the Bees held the nap hand contract wise and were quite happy to put him on gardening leave. Dyche wanted him, we paid £3.5 million and the sell-on is 27.5%, and I got that information straight from the horses mouth. NDA prevents me from naming the source , but I am 100% certain that was the case.

In retrospect it was the best we could do and Brentford are in a different league transfer nous/wise to us.

BT --that is exactly the way that it works, however, nous/wise doesn't even come into it because the agents, on all sides, do the necessary and screw as much as possible for their own pockets. Simple fact is that we wanted Tarkowski, we paid the negotiated price and what transpires from now is another thing, however, his agent will not miss out!