O/T:- James Rowe's Cheaterfurlough Sacking

[SwalePie]

Two 'interesting' articles...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-10806267/Chesterfield-axed-boss-***ual-indecency-wrote-FA-warning-posed-danger-women.html?fbclid=IwAR20qcog_pDgtW3laesG3R1WwFIsiv WWgCBC9UNVjp5mXwSEtRd6G2-AkKY

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-10811035/AFC-Fylde-face-questions-young-female-physios-asked-provide-treatment-James-Rowe.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ico=taboola_feed_article _desktop_sport

[queenslandpie]

Usually not the case but it seems most of the allegations that were thrown around about this guy have substance. You only have to watch his post match intreviews to get a feel for the type of character he is. Not a particularly nice one.

[Lullapie]

Wow, Chesterfield need to be really careful. They forced him to leave the club without anything being proved with him denying the accusation. They then wrote to the FA, without anything being proved or Rowe accepting the accusation and now someone has leaked something to the Press on the matter. This is trial by media not trial by facts. Whether or not Rowe did this is irrelevant without any proof.

[cher1]

Wow, Chesterfield need to be really careful. They forced him to leave the club without anything being proved with him denying the accusation. They then wrote to the FA, without anything being proved or Rowe accepting the accusation and now someone has leaked something to the Press on the matter. This is trial by media not trial by facts. Whether or not Rowe did this is irrelevant without any proof.

It's no different to any other gross misconduct case at work (other than the particularly vile nature of the behaviour). There will have been an accusation and an investigation would have been carried out by sometime senior and a conclusion reached.

In terms of proof, the balance of evidence must have shown that the person who made the complaint was believed. There isn't always proof, nor does there need to be, it's based on the balance of probabilities.

Someone accused of what is a s e xual offence is unlikely to 'accept' it, let's be realistic, so I don't think anything can be read into that.

Agree entirely about the media getting hold of it, but am guessing that will be down to an individual who knew or found out, maybe even at the FA, rather than the club itself leaking it.

As their governing body, presumably Chessie were obliged to tell the FA. Depressing but but not surprising that the FA don't consider it a safeguarding issue as the alleged victim was over 18. They didn't even keep children safe from predators.

[Davy500]

Wow, Chesterfield need to be really careful. They forced him to leave the club without anything being proved with him denying the accusation. They then wrote to the FA, without anything being proved or Rowe accepting the accusation and now someone has leaked something to the Press on the matter. This is trial by media not trial by facts. Whether or not Rowe did this is irrelevant without any proof.

Chesterfield have paid the price since Rowe left, and that combined with Tsangu geeting injured, i said at the time thats them done, no way they would remain top , and since then they have slipped lower and lower

[ncfcog]

There's no smoke without fire as they say.

[PedroTheFisherman66]

Was there a bath, enormous c0ck and a selfie involved.?

[ncfcog]

Was there a bath, enormous c0ck and a selfie involved.?

When you say "enormous c0ck" I'm assuming you mean the person and not his appendage?

[irishpete]

Was there a bath, enormous c0ck and a selfie involved.?

Did it rise to the occasion?

[Mapperleypie]

Paul Cook is a bit prickly.

https://twitter.com/robstaton/status...816280578?s=20