
Originally Posted by
Freeman25
What are you talking about? This rhetoric is complete b*llocks and needs to stop imo, Ardley has always been one for throwing in youngsters - Ben Barclay, Ryan Schofield, Sam Stubbs, Sam Graham, Joel Bagan, Adam Long, Virgil Gomis, Pierce Bird, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Dion Kelly Evans, Regan Booty, Sam Osborne, Kyle Wootton and Cal Roberts are all 23 or under and have all played under Neal Ardley. You can argue that a lot of those aren't "our youngsters" but that's not Neal's fault, if he thinks they're good enough he will bring them in and play them, end of.
---
I'm pleased Osborne has made the brave (and correct imo) decision to broaden his horizons, he had no divine right to start ahead of probably the best winger in the division in Cal Roberts and Enzio can also play on the right wing so all this "he should have played more is nonsense", he did need to be playing regular football and unfortunately for him he's too far down the pecking order to get that here.
I do think he was massively over rated because he was local, ala Scott Loach, Terry Hawkridge, Haydn Hollis and Pierce Bird who all seemed to be able to do no wrong and had glowing reviews when they joined their new clubs because of their local ties. If Osbourne had been from Holland and managed 2 goals in 13 appearances, a lot of them offering very little else then god help him, nobody would've batted an eyelid about him leaving and I'd go as far as to say that people might have even been annoyed he was even offered a deal, his performances were really nothing special.
The bottom line is Ardley offered him a contract, he wanted first team football and rightfully wasn't going to be guaranteed that here so moving on was the best option for him. I wish him all the best.