Clements and Sky

[triz]

I can.....warnock played well on Saturday, certainly better than christie did against burnley who wasted everything that came to him. People bummed christie and slated warnock, some clueless people gave him 3/10!! What a joke. Minds are made up on him and he's too old and not the future.

I gave him 3/10 because that's how I saw his performance ... I cant justify giving him another 3 marks just because he made a decent cross to Johnson..
So we dont agree.. Well there is a surprise.. Clueless? Feck off.
[/quote]

Yh that's all he did, like i said he was a lot superior all round than christie was vs burnley. It's all about opinions and mine is that if anyone saw that performance as 3/10 they are genuinely clueless.

[triz]

I can.....warnock played well on Saturday, certainly better than christie did against burnley who wasted everything that came to him. People bummed christie and slated warnock, some clueless people gave him 3/10!! What a joke. Minds are made up on him and he's too old and not the future.

I think the words pot and kettle come to mind here. No matter what Christie does or doesn't do some people continually slate him. Was it Christie who got easily turned at a corner against MK only for the forward to blaze over the bar, or was Christie who made an almighty mess of a simple back pass that again should have resulted in a tap in. Because he is not causing goals to be conceded, he is getting the blame for not picking out one striker in the middle of 5 or 6 defenders. I'm just waiting for Keogh to make a mistake which results in a goal conceded, then the floodgates will open.[/quote]


I don

[AngryRam]

I can.....warnock played well on Saturday, certainly better than christie did against burnley who wasted everything that came to him. People bummed christie and slated warnock, some clueless people gave him 3/10!! What a joke. Minds are made up on him and he's too old and not the future.

I gave him 3/10 because that's how I saw his performance ... I cant justify giving him another 3 marks just because he made a decent cross to Johnson..
So we dont agree.. Well there is a surprise.. Clueless? Feck off.
[/quote]

Yh that's all he did, like i said he was a lot superior all round than christie was vs burnley. It's all about opinions and mine is that if anyone saw that performance as 3/10 they are genuinely clueless.[/quote]

What's Christie against Burnley got to do with match ratings against MKD.. Clueless!
Ella gave him 6/10 and an other 3

[triz]

I see, the reason i think you're clueless for marking him as 3/10 is that I am lacking cognitively so I cannot grasp your clearly superior intellect, right you are. I see that now.

aaaanyway I think I made the relevance for my comparison to christie performance vs burnley pretty clear, I'll not be repeating myself for those who don't understand.

[vanderlaans_header]

Can't explain what's happened with Warnock. I was really pleased when McClaren signed him. Always rated him wherever he's been and thought he would be a really crucial signing. It's just not worked out, ever since that debut red card. The only time I've seem him play well was against Villareal, mystifying.

Yes I had expectations when Mac signed him, but getting sent off (was it on his debut?) didn't help. Otherwise yet to be convinced and as I stated in another post I think that Warnock and Baird may fall into the category of squad players, albeit decent ones with a positive attitude.

[AngryRam]

I see, the reason i think you're clueless for marking him as 3/10 is that I am lacking cognitively so I cannot grasp your clearly superior intellect, right you are. I see that now.
.

Probably the first thing you have got right.. Anyway we are probably boring the pants off evryone now, we are starting to sound like Basie and his mates.
Time to move on.

[triz]

I see, the reason i think you're clueless for marking him as 3/10 is that I am lacking cognitively so I cannot grasp your clearly superior intellect, right you are. I see that now.
.

Probably the first thing you have got right..
[/quote]


Ooh snap. You're right we should move on, to be honest I don't know how I dared take on such an acerbic wit.

[AngryRam]

I see, the reason i think you're clueless for marking him as 3/10 is that I am lacking cognitively so I cannot grasp your clearly superior intellect, right you are. I see that now.
.

Probably the first thing you have got right..
[/quote]


Ooh snap. You're right we should move on, to be honest I don't know how I dared take on such an acerbic wit. [/quote]

Ha I've obviously got under your skin precious, just using a big word does not mean anything. Wallow in if you want.
I will be off line for a few days so over to you for the last word.

[triz]

Whatever made you think that sweetheart, I think you were the one that began with telling me to ********* off. I think the evidence suggests 'twas me that riledyour good self. And I've very much enjoyed mocking you since, whilst you get all eggy. Now which word did you consider particularly big? Did I give you too much credit?

[ellafella]

Whatever made you think that sweetheart, I think you were the one that began with telling me to ********* off. I think the evidence suggests 'twas me that riledyour good self. And I've very much enjoyed mocking you since, whilst you get all eggy. Now which word did you consider particularly big? Did I give you too much credit?

...but do you still love him Trizzy-wizzy-woo? Go on...say you do...