Quote Originally Posted by Andy_Faber View Post
You're inventing your own false news again. I quote from a Nick Vamos (head of special crime at the CPS) BBC interview

'The CPS could find no evidence that spending rules had been deliberately broken by Tory agents or candidates when filling in their returns.

"Although there is evidence to suggest the returns may have been inaccurate, there is insufficient evidence to prove to the criminal standard that any candidate or agent was dishonest,"

Although in a way you are right because its not in the public interest to prosecute people who are innocent in law...
As I said, there is insufficient evidence to pin it on a person, because those who made the expenditure were told by Tory HQ it was national spending when according to election rules it was actually local spending.

So was it a cock up or was it a deliberate fiddle using a smokescreen to pump money into marginal seats?