I don't particularly care for International football and don't follow it. However, with that being said even I know that England has sucked for years and years. Not sure why anyone would want an "English only" team in today's day and age. You could substitute any country and still end up with a team not as good as you'd get if you assembled the best that you could get regardless of country.

However, since you brought it up you had your wish a while back when Bates owned us. We were pretty much an English player dominated club. In case you missed it we were in League 1 and needed a miracle goal by Beckford to win automatic promotion. I think the year we were promoted a club won the prem with 3 English players.

You theory also does not hold up when you look at the worlds best clubs now. they are are compilations of the best players they can find without regard to where they are from. Enlgish players also tend to be overpaid when viewed in totality of the world's football talent pool.

I'll stick with the owner getting the best players he can regardless if they can play England or not.

You might be better off supporting a conference club. I think they are almost all English players.