Rod & TT
Just agree to disagree for now and go back at it later in the season !
All of us agree - UTCB
Chips, all it needs is for Rod to answer the question, with some logic,as to why he has got it into his head that I want SUFC to fail but he's shying away from being challenged.
Back to the music again because, with Rod "It's not unusual"
Maybe he knows he can't justify it but that would involve him admitting it so I'm not holding my breath.
Last edited by tomytony; 31-10-2017 at 04:58 PM.
Chippy i tek your point mi owd pal,but TT always wants the last word( a bit like some wives)as displayed in the 2 posts above this.He's obviously used to gerrin his own way is owd Basil Fawlty and if he dunt he gets a bit mardy but hey he's entitled to his views.For the record i don't think he wants the BLADES to fail but he most certainly wants King Kev to mess up and if the BLADES get caught up in the mess up so be it. UTCB
"wants KKev to mess up"
That's what he's done for 10 years, the Blades hjave been "caught up in the mess" because of him, not in spite of him, hence my posts over the years.
It's not about having the last word, it's about pointing out the flaws in your arguments so, on that basis, I'll be posting forever.![]()
See what i mean Chippy,always wants the last word does TT.The Prince is supposed to lookin into investin in a Belgium 2nd division club accordin to the News Now pages,is this the begginin of the end of his time wi the BLADES? UTCB
Why don't you try not just to read the responses but also try to understand them?
I explained why I respond to your posts, because they are often illogical, ignore the points made and do not provide a direct response.
Still, your cheap attempts to score even cheaper points serve only to point out your inabilities and lack of understanding of how to conduct a reasoned argument every time you post.
Why else would you keep stating that I want the Blades to fail unless you wanted to malign me?
It's nothing to do with not agreeing, it's why fora exist, to encourage debate,comment and reasoned argument to back up the respective stances.
In your case you get an idea into your head and repeat it ad nauseum and, when challenged, just repeat the mantra or claim you are being 'talked down to' in an attempt to play the victim,gain sympathy and support from others.
Just because you refuse to, or are unable to, constuct a logical defence of your position does not mean that others should lower themselves to that level.
Now, how about just answering the question as to why you think I want SUFC to fail?