Change in disciplinary punishments

[DerbyDaDream]

Diving has become a real issue the rules should state that if a person dives to alter the course of the game in their favour, they should get a straight red card no questions asked for plain and simple cheating.

[Romanis]

Diving has become a real issue the rules should state that if a person dives to alter the course of the game in their favour, they should get a straight red card no questions asked for plain and simple cheating.

I would agree with you in principle, but as a former referee myself, this is extremely hard to police. And then you have different degrees, tolerance levels. How can a referee be certain 100% of the time it's dive, how does he judge intent in a matter of seconds.
I think a yellow card is sufficient penalty, although perhaps you could designate it as 1 of the more severe forms of yellow just short red.
2 similar yellows and a 3 match ban with a hefty fine?
DDD what do you know about this new interpretation about red cards for goalies? I've forgotten how it's to implemented. I know if the defender still brings him down and this denies him a scoring chance, it's red and penalty but this has been tweaked to offer some respite to goalies. Any facts? A bot of googling perhaps, your favourite fetish...

[DerbyDaDream]

I would agree with you in principle, but as a former referee myself, this is extremely hard to police. And then you have different degrees, tolerance levels. How can a referee be certain 100% of the time it's dive, how does he judge intent in a matter of seconds.
I think a yellow card is sufficient penalty, although perhaps you could designate it as 1 of the more severe forms of yellow just short red.
2 similar yellows and a 3 match ban with a hefty fine?
DDD what do you know about this new interpretation about red cards for goalies? I've forgotten how it's to implemented. I know if the defender still brings him down and this denies him a scoring chance, it's red and penalty but this has been tweaked to offer some respite to goalies. Any facts? A bot of googling perhaps, your favourite fetish...

Cameron Jerome wasn’t a dive and he got booked for a dive when he was in clear view of it, so most all referees nowadays are old pensioners who are past their sell by date and should go in a retirement home and let some younger referees take charge who have a better whit about them.

[Romanis]

Cameron Jerome wasn’t a dive and he got booked for a dive when he was in clear view of it, so most all referees nowadays are old pensioners who are past their sell by date and should go in a retirement home and let some younger referees take charge who have a better whit about them.

Hmmm, you're contradicting yourself there. you want younger referees because they know a little bit?
I guess most people prefer experience and knowledge with a sharp mind. But you prefer dim-wits?
Oh I get it, you're talking about yourself! The Twit Whit!

(PS: you may want to google the meaning of whit, if as expected, you fail to understand, a common trend with you)

[DerbyDaDream]

Hmmm, you're contradicting yourself there. you want younger referees because they know a little bit?
I guess most people prefer experience and knowledge with a sharp mind. But you prefer dim-wits?
Oh I get it, you're talking about yourself! The Twit Whit!

(PS: you may want to google the meaning of whit, if as expected, you fail to understand, a common trend with you)

Whit is got a bit going in them then the older referees they have more life in them a better understanding how the game is played, the best referee I have seen was Mark Clattenburg no one even comes close to him when it comes to making drastic decisions.