+ Visit Sheffield United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 86

Thread: message to the board

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5,602
    Quote Originally Posted by Longshortandtall View Post
    Its been well documented that Kevin McCabe triggered the buy out clause. CW said on Saturday he has no problems with either owner he just wants them to get on with getting the matter settled. I doubt very much Chris Wilder will be making adverse comments about one of the owners to so called mates. As Carpe Diem says CW's mates got form for stirring he needs to do CW a favour and keep quiet.
    ru sure macabe triggerd it and not the prince ?

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5,602
    Quote Originally Posted by Carpe_diem View Post
    If I had a best mate who leaked absolutely everything I ever said to all and sundry he wouldn't be my best mate for very long, is all I'm saying.
    can ya remember the tweet from him at christmas, i cant remember the exact words. we go to away games on the same coach he gets our tickets, you only have to say things to one person and it goes round like wild fire. but thats the situation im afraid. hopefully it,ll change cause wilder is backing himself into an alley with the none foreign signing stance.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,544
    Quote Originally Posted by Twirlo70 View Post
    ru sure macabe triggerd it and not the prince ?
    "Prince Abdullah, who acquired a 50 per cent stake in United five years ago, launched his takeover attempt “in response” to a process instigated by one of McCabe’s companies according to an official club statement earlier this term.

    Read more at: https://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/football/sheffield-united/i-stayed-too-long-at-a-club-before-i-won-t-do-it-again-a-frustrated-chris-wilder-as-boardroom-battle-threatens-sheffield-united-future-1-9140735"

  4. #64
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    4,239
    thing is and im not sticking up for the prince here if hes a 50 per cent shareholder in the club he is certainly entitled to his opinion on which way the club goes so really mcabe the prince and chris surely have to get round the table to work a compromise out

  5. #65
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,544
    Quote Originally Posted by shorehamoldboy View Post
    thing is and im not sticking up for the prince here if hes a 50 per cent shareholder in the club he is certainly entitled to his opinion on which way the club goes so really mcabe the prince and chris surely have to get round the table to work a compromise out
    Well, this is a very good point.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5,602
    Quote Originally Posted by shorehamoldboy View Post
    thing is and im not sticking up for the prince here if hes a 50 per cent shareholder in the club he is certainly entitled to his opinion on which way the club goes so really mcabe the prince and chris surely have to get round the table to work a compromise out
    100% agree and i think there will be a compromise from all parties, there simply has to be for the clubs sake.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,388
    Quote Originally Posted by shorehamoldboy View Post
    thing is and im not sticking up for the prince here if hes a 50 per cent shareholder in the club he is certainly entitled to his opinion on which way the club goes so really mcabe the prince and chris surely have to get round the table to work a compromise out
    That has to be the way forward SOB to end the stalemate. Prince is entitled to push for change if he sees this is the best way to get into the Premiership. Provided there is no threat to CW's position I don't see what the problem is in looking at the foreign market. If the Belgian club the Prince has bought is to be used as a feeder club to SUFC then again no problem with that approach. We need to scout overseas as we can't compete in the UK market.

    The sticking point would seem to be Van Winckel's role. He's currently called a Technical Director and there is a suggestion that the fall out occurred when it was proposed he sat on the Technical Committee which deals with player recruitment. Again provided Van Winckel doesn't have a casting vote and is only 1 member with one voice whats the problem here? He has a wealth of knowledge in the Belgium market and a lot of expertise in sports science which could assist Matt Prestridge in player conditioning/fitness.

    Seems to me there is a lot of posturing over who has the final say on matters and what everyone needs to do including the owners is to work together to effect the incremental improvements the manager keeps stressing we need to move up to the next level.

    Of course finding the increased investment from both owners is critical but that may be held up because of the dispute and not because of a serious lack of funds. Who knows? whatever happens we need a speedy resolution.

    A new agreement between the owners setting out structure, responsibilities and agreed levels of investment would seem the best outcome for all.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    2,257
    Quote Originally Posted by Longshortandtall View Post
    That has to be the way forward SOB to end the stalemate. Prince is entitled to push for change if he sees this is the best way to get into the Premiership. Provided there is no threat to CW's position I don't see what the problem is in looking at the foreign market. If the Belgian club the Prince has bought is to be used as a feeder club to SUFC then again no problem with that approach. We need to scout overseas as we can't compete in the UK market.

    The sticking point would seem to be Van Winckel's role. He's currently called a Technical Director and there is a suggestion that the fall out occurred when it was proposed he sat on the Technical Committee which deals with player recruitment. Again provided Van Winckel doesn't have a casting vote and is only 1 member with one voice whats the problem here? He has a wealth of knowledge in the Belgium market and a lot of expertise in sports science which could assist Matt Prestridge in player conditioning/fitness.

    Seems to me there is a lot of posturing over who has the final say on matters and what everyone needs to do including the owners is to work together to effect the incremental improvements the manager keeps stressing we need to move up to the next level.

    Of course finding the increased investment from both owners is critical but that may be held up because of the dispute and not because of a serious lack of funds. Who knows? whatever happens we need a speedy resolution.

    A new agreement between the owners setting out structure, responsibilities and agreed levels of investment would seem the best outcome for all.
    Perhaps McCabe and the Prince need to go to marriage guidance. In hindsight 50:50 ownership does not work, different opinions leads to no action. They need to sit down and decide which one is taking the club forward. The partnership is currently in intensive care.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    4,239
    ive a feeling youve hit the nail on the head there lst this van winckel guy may well want to be influential in recruiting new players and i think thats whats upset chris this sort of thing has happened at other clubs and i honestly dont think chris would except this situation and if he hasnt got sole power over recruitment i fear he could well resign

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,273
    Quote Originally Posted by Longshortandtall View Post
    That has to be the way forward SOB to end the stalemate. Prince is entitled to push for change if he sees this is the best way to get into the Premiership. Provided there is no threat to CW's position I don't see what the problem is in looking at the foreign market. If the Belgian club the Prince has bought is to be used as a feeder club to SUFC then again no problem with that approach. We need to scout overseas as we can't compete in the UK market.

    The sticking point would seem to be Van Winckel's role. He's currently called a Technical Director and there is a suggestion that the fall out occurred when it was proposed he sat on the Technical Committee which deals with player recruitment. Again provided Van Winckel doesn't have a casting vote and is only 1 member with one voice whats the problem here? He has a wealth of knowledge in the Belgium market and a lot of expertise in sports science which could assist Matt Prestridge in player conditioning/fitness.

    Seems to me there is a lot of posturing over who has the final say on matters and what everyone needs to do including the owners is to work together to effect the incremental improvements the manager keeps stressing we need to move up to the next level.

    Of course finding the increased investment from both owners is critical but that may be held up because of the dispute and not because of a serious lack of funds. Who knows? whatever happens we need a speedy resolution.

    A new agreement between the owners setting out structure, responsibilities and agreed levels of investment would seem the best outcome for all.
    The only two people who matter are the owners. There is no "casting vote" available to anyone else on the board. They all do what they're told.

Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •