Posters leaving

[ghostrider]

This is the only bit I need to answer as it proves a point.

You have just thrown in a handful of random quotes as replies from other posters.

Now go back a short time and quote some of the vile, indecent quotes from your paramours (what's all this about, pat?) replies AND THERE ARE LITERALLY HUNDREDS TO CHOOSE FROM.

Also I haven't used any posts that push boundaries from either side, I've merely stated a few sayings that posters generally use to try and take the high ground and try and force actions. We don't need to play the who said what bile or vile game as it could be endless from both sides, whether it's in jest or as a dig.

Ghost if one of your ilk were to brutally murder and disembowel a saint you would come up with an argument and reasons for them to be given a knighthood along with a state pension. And that's not an exaggeration, it is typical.

You've just simply pulled that from the air. It's a nothing thing.
You are saying it because I can see both sides to a story but also play devils advocate at times, whilst also defending one person who I think gets a massive rough end treatment from posters no matter what he says.
He even gets it when he hasn't posted for a while. Now who's instigating?

You're not innocent pat and neither are a lot...including myself.
Just accept that all parties are complicit throughout and accept that all parties will argue a case regardless of whether it's legitimate or biased, or by simply following a mass debate and taking the majority side for ease of speech and comfort of backing.

[Tut_Foster]

Nowts changed on here I see I've missed this

[ex_pat_magpie]

Also I haven't used any posts that push boundaries from either side, I've merely stated a few sayings that posters generally use to try and take the high ground and try and force actions. We don't need to play the who said what bile or vile game as it could be endless from both sides, whether it's in jest or as a dig.


You've just simply pulled that from the air. It's a nothing thing.
You are saying it because I can see both sides to a story but also play devils advocate at times, whilst also defending one person who I think gets a massive rough end treatment from posters no matter what he says.
He even gets it when he hasn't posted for a while. Now who's instigating?

You're not innocent pat and neither are a lot...including myself.
Just accept that all parties are complicit throughout and accept that all parties will argue a case regardless of whether it's legitimate or biased, or by simply following a mass debate and taking the majority side for ease of speech and comfort of backing.

So in conclusion would you give us your version or description of a W.U.M. and in case you are going to hedge and ask what a W.U.M. I'm talking about a "wind up merchant".

You state "He even gets it when he hasn't posted for a while. Now who's instigating?"

You assume as I didn't mention the name of any poster. I did say of your Ilk (Guilty conscience is it)

[pboromag]

Standard Pboro wind up.

[ghostrider]

So in conclusion would you give us your version or description of a W.U.M. and in case you are going to hedge and ask what a W.U.M. I'm talking about a "wind up merchant".

A wind up merchant is you me and pboro and many people on this forum. Some are good at it and some aren't quite as good.
Wind ups can be good bad and ugly, depending.
It can go from the simply to the ongoing and teet for tat games of each other winding up.
Pboro does it and so do you. So do many on here....including myself.

What's the problem with it?
If a person doesn't like whatever wind up then ignore it and move on or get involved and play it out. Make a good bit of fun on it. Use it as an experiment in wit.
I don't know what else you want me to say on it.

You state "He even gets it when he hasn't posted for a while. Now who's instigating?"

Anyone who puts posts up goading him in. It's not just him that hoys up the odd posts that goads people in you know. You've been guilty of it many times as well. No point in denial at this point, pat.

You know I can bring many up to prove a point so let's not go down that route when there's no real need.
Let's just keep it mild and simple.

You assume as I didn't mention the name of any poster. I did say of your Ilk (Guilty conscience is it)

Yeah mate I assume because it's pretty clear, so there's no need to even argue this point. You made it plain enough yet I'm not whining about it. You can have it and own it if you feel it helps you win some kind of point.

This is how it should be. Just ride over it and move on.
Next question pat?

[ex_pat_magpie]

Standard Pboro wind up.

No one is interested in Pboro let alone being bothered. So don't get bigheaded and just concentrate on your own EXPERT windups.

[pboromag]

So jammy you don't think pats constant arguments with me and ghost are detrimental to the board ?

[Jammy89]

So jammy you don't think pats constant arguments with me and ghost are detrimental to the board ?

I think you've all been told numerous times.

Pat isn't blameless but you go out of your way to provoke him repeatedly.

And despite being told several times about the ignore feature and how it works you constantly use it as stick to try and beat Pat with.

[pboromag]

You say me
Who is he arguing with
Not me
You take my post down when I say he is one of 3 supposably ruining the board
Why protect him
This is another thread ruined where pat has been involved in petty prove this prove that your a liar arguments

You say he isn't blameless
But what proportion of blame does he have on ruining this thread

[ghostrider]

You say me
Who is he arguing with
Not me
You take my post down when I say he is one of 3 supposably ruining the board
Why protect him
This is another thread ruined where pat has been involved in petty prove this prove that your a liar arguments

You say he isn't blameless
But what proportion of blame does he have on ruining this thread

None. He has no blame.