Tommy Robinson

[Romanis]

Romanis!

You aint Tariq Aziz!! He is a Luton born lad who now works in the logistics department of KLM in Amsterdam. The lad is a Soulie and a good friend. Do not tarnish his good name!

Oh well, I'll settle for Sarah Huckerbee Sanders then.
I've always had a feminine side to me.
Everyone is free to buy me a dress. Has to be either green or floral.

[MadAmster]

Oh well, I'll settle for Sarah Huckerbee Sanders then.
I've always had a feminine side to me.
Everyone is free to buy me a dress. Has to be either green or floral.

Good on ya Sarah

[DCFCArmy]

See the footage of the coppers cra*** their pants and running for their lives?

The tommy boys ran them out of town the pedo protecting bas****

TOMMY TOMMY TOMMY ROBINSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He will be let go

[Romanis]

See the footage of the coppers cra*** their pants and running for their lives?

The tommy boys ran them out of town the pedo protecting bas****

TOMMY TOMMY TOMMY ROBINSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He will be let go

Wonderful!

[Andy_Faber]

Pretty much suppressed on UK TV and mis-reported by the press, the response to the march on social media demonstrates a sad trait that facebook and the like appears to have encouraged - there were just about equal numbers of threads/status updates started both in favour and in opposition to the march, and NO discussion about it, or the underlying issues which lead to it - just hundreds (sometimes thousands) of people voicing agreement with the whatever stance the OP had.

The only minor bit of comedy relief was the repeated posting of a supposed aerial shot of the march crowded round Whitehall, which was rumbled fairly quickly as a photo from 2005 of the Liverpool FC Euro parade outside Liverpool town hall...

[ramAnag]

See the footage of the coppers cra*** their pants and running for their lives?

The tommy boys ran them out of town the pedo protecting bas****

TOMMY TOMMY TOMMY ROBINSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He will be let go

Perhaps, seeing as you are obviously such a supporter of this Robinson character, you could actually argue his case rather than just write puerile and offensive rubbish about violence towards ‘coppers’ and how they support ‘pedos’ by which I assume you mean ‘peados’.
The floor is yours...why is he worth your concern?

[Romanis]

Perhaps, seeing as you are obviously such a supporter of this Robinson character, you could actually argue his case rather than just write puerile and offensive rubbish about violence towards ‘coppers’ and how they support ‘pedos’ by which I assume you mean ‘peados’.
The floor is yours...why is he worth your concern?

I'm extremely confident that the gentleman will be able to easily elucidate you and many others and give a very very excellent reply.
But what's the point if its only gonna attract vile, hateful and unsubstantiated responses?

We all know these will be fake news and it'll be used to attack the esteemed gentleman's standing in order to ensnare him into a ban of some sort.

Therefore I return to what I said at the start:

To cut a long story short, why don't we all agree that DCFCA is right?

No person of high standing or fibre will ever say that the gentleman is wrong or mistaken given his sterling record and impeccable credentials!

[ramAnag]

I'm extremely confident that the gentleman will be able to easily elucidate you and many others and give a very very excellent reply.
But what's the point if its only gonna attract vile, hateful and unsubstantiated responses?

We all know these will be fake news and it'll be used to attack the esteemed gentleman's standing in order to ensnare him into a ban of some sort.

Therefore I return to what I said at the start:

To cut a long story short, why don't we all agree that DCFCA is right?

No person of high standing or fibre will ever say that the gentleman is wrong or mistaken given his sterling record and impeccable credentials!

Perhaps m’learned friend could pause to recognise that the only ‘vile, hateful and unsubstantiated responses’ have actually originated from his ‘client’ and stfu.

[Romanis]

Perhaps m’learned friend could pause to recognise that the only ‘vile, hateful and unsubstantiated responses’ have actually originated from his ‘client’ and stfu.

Correction, I'm currently only the spokesperson. I act for another client. But maybe the gentleman might consider becoming my client as well.

As the spokesperson, I'm obliged to clarify and state truthfully his thoughts and responses in the manner that befits his standing.

I'm sure there must have been some miscommunication for you to associate the gentleman with what you just wrote. I'm happy to clarify things.
Much obliged.

[Andy_Faber]

If you want a discussion on the subject fine, but please bear in mind Crown Court went off screen in 1984 due to lack of interest.

IMO Robinson's situation stems from a deep-seated prejudice fuelled by frustration at an apparent institutionalised lack of response/acceptance by those in power, which he has then vented in what I think is a totally unacceptable way. However, the visible rise of his support, be they the few thugs seen in the media or the tens of thousands of ordinary folk who turned out in support, suggests that there is a semi-silent undercurrent of that same frustration-fuelled prejudice around the country. I'm not siding, just observing