Quote Originally Posted by Andy_Faber View Post
Simple Ra I live in the real world, we are leaving the EU and that being the case EVERYONE, inc me, you, Gina bl@@dy Miilar, EU flag Bill, the frankly useless HM government snd opposition SHOULD be pouring every ounce of effort into making Brexit work for UK. That approach stems from four decades in industry as a boss and a pleb at various times, where, when a task was given to me, I considered two things: is it legal? Is it ethical? And both those being yes, id get on with it, entrusting my boss with seeing a bigger picture
Andy...’I live in the real world, we are leaving the EU’. Really? Is that totally decided then?
I don’t think so. There is still a lot of water to flow under the proverbial bridge and as much chance of a second referendum, imo, as there is of a no deal Brexit or any sort of deal on Brexit.
What if there is a second referendum and what if that second referendum concludes that they’ve looked at the future and if the ‘future is Brexit’ they don’t bloody like it? Does that then become your ‘real world’.
Just answer the following few Yes/No questions.
1) Was the referendum ever anything more than advisory?
2) Were people ever sufficiently well informed about complexities such as NI and the implications for trade?
3) Did a genuine majority of the electorate vote in favour of Brexit given that this was a ‘two horse race’?
4) Did the Remain campaign abide by electoral law in the run up to the Referendum?
5) Were voters truthfully informed by claims in the Referendum campaign?
6) Since June 2016 have you been encouraged by the result of the Referendum as far as the UK’s future in the next two decades is concerned?
Six serious questions which I very much doubt you’ll be able to answer with anything other than a ‘No’. That being the case why, oh why, do you persist in describing it as the ‘real world’? There’s still time to change from something which you have admitted elsewhere you don’t actually agree with.