Anyone listen to wm last night?

[Baggiemadguern]

Here's the thread, a thread I never denied writing contrary to what you believe and my thread was, posted hours after 11am.

It's strange that you don't like my dingle p iss taking, but when they do it on their website, I site you post on, you never find the need to admonish them or indeed anybody else ever on here who has written a anti ding or vile thread.

Given what depraved things go on on the net, from terrorist recruitment, fraud and *****philia to name a few this thread was the one that should be censored.

Good job the rozzers have no resources as I could have been looking at a long stretch for this obscene filth.

You said I referred to a post not written by you on Armadtice Day?

I twist things, you need to look in the mirror!

The post you refer to wasn't written by me on Armistice day, you just chose to respond to it then directing your post at me, so that wasn't personal to me?

I responded basically that how dare you try to link an unrelated football post to Armistice day and that my Grandfather had fought in Burma and you disparaged that service by saying you were sure many had served and not just my Grandfather.

Tell me is that twisted too?

You were referring to me when saying failed accountant as it was to do with the the interpretation of the Wba fc accounts.

I don't disagree with you re Albion, as you never actually talk about Albion, you just dig others out for their opinion and how they respond to fans of the opposition.

I have never seen a post from you suggesting a player we sign or a system we play or anything at all to do with the Albion.

Just dig after dig at how others post.

Keep me up to date on the pilgrims progress.

[Baggiemadguern]

Baggiesblood Quote But, how about you putting your quote disparaging my Grandfather's service in Burma in that same thread by saying that many people had served. Quote


What I wrote about people in that war, and responded to your being proud of your family was this


’I would suggest most have relatives who have fought bravely for their country, I have and what they did was a wonderful thing and I too feel very proud of what they did but sad that they had to face what they faced and for the effect it had on them the rest of there lives.’

How does that disparage your relatives. You try to fit things to support an argument that has no validity.

[BaggieBlood]

Baggiesblood Quote But, how about you putting your quote disparaging my Grandfather's service in Burma in that same thread by saying that many people had served. Quote


What I wrote about people in that war, and responded to your being proud of your family was this


’I would suggest most have relatives who have fought bravely for their country, I have and what they did was a wonderful thing and I too feel very proud of what they did but sad that they had to face what they faced and for the effect it had on them the rest of there lives.’

How does that disparage your relatives. You try to fit things to support an argument that has no validity.

You clearly imply his service was nothing special as many would have had relatives who fought, why say that?

I hadn't said my Grandfather won the war on his own, so why mention anything about anybody else, other than to dismiss his service as common practice.

Have you fought in any wars?

You equated a nothing p iss take thread on a football fan site, to the brutality of probably the most bloodiest war of all time.

Get a grip.

[Baggiemadguern]

You clearly imply his service was nothing special as many would have had relatives who fought, why say that?

I hadn't said my Grandfather won the war on his own, so why mention anything about anybody else, other than to dismiss his service as common practice.

Have you fought in any wars?

You equated a nothing p iss take thread on a football fan site, to the brutality of probably the most bloodiest war of all time.

Get a grip.

Baggieblood,

I will do you the curtesy of answering your question, one which you do not reciprocate toward me.

“You clearly imply his service was nothing special as many would have had relatives who fought, why say that?”

This I believe refers to the line -
’I would suggest most have relatives who have fought bravely for their country, I have and what they did was a wonderful thing and I too feel very proud of what they did but sad that they had to face what they faced and for the effect it had on them the rest of there lives.’

That is a factual statement and disparages no one. It actually enhances one being proud of brave relatives and the effects of those wars on those that fought and survived.

“I hadn't said my Grandfather won the war on his own, so why mention anything about anybody else, other than to dismiss his service as common practice.”

Please point out where I say your grandfather won the war on his own?

I have, thank God, never had to fight in a war.

Your final sentence refers to how you read your opening post on that thread. I saw it in a different light on a weekend that was about the sufferings of war and remembering casualties of those wars. It, for me, was a weekend when we should all stand together and be proud of those men and being British. (I am not saying you did not see it inn the same light) but that is the difference in the way you and I saw your post.

The above indicates that you have misconstrued what I have posted.

Your original post was written on Armistice Day, the 11 November, something you have denied. This was the Saturday and Sunday the 12 November was Rememberence Sunday. This year, they both fall on Sunday the 11 November. I will grant that you posted it beyond 11am on the Saturday (Armatice day) My post was on the 12, Remeberence Sunday, before the one minute silence. That is why I referred to it in that post.

I do not take sentences apart and utilise individual words to comfort myself.

If you continue down that post 51 of that thread and read the last three or four paragraphs you can see an explanation of why I wrote what I wrote, followed by an apology if I had offended you. I did withdraw that apology later due to your subsequent posting.

Regards

BMG

[BaggieBlood]

Once again, I have not denied anything I said I wrote it one day and you waited to respond to on the poignant Remembrance Sunday.

It was you who tried to instigate, what you describe as "abuse" that day.

I have not denied anything, if you read my posts I brought it up in the first place.

I can go and find dozens of similar threads from other posters where you have not piped up.

But, dig after dig at whatever I write.

Whatever, you class as a weekend is not shared by the rest of the UK and common wealth as they all pay their respects on RS.

Yet, you try and instigate something on that day in relation to a harmless thread which had no swearing in it and referred to the wm football phone on a football forum.

You now answer my questions, where was your indignation when disgusting views were put on here since my thread?

I am not going to take your constant digs trying to portray me some kind of forum Oppenheimer.

You say I don't like other opinions.

Show me, where I have said your opinion is wrong.

Or do I just put my opinion that is different on here.

The day I conform with some of sh it on here is the day pack it in.

Now answer the questions, what did you do in response to the homophobic and other posts?

[Baggiemadguern]

Once again, I have not denied anything I said I wrote it one day and you waited to respond to on the poignant Remembrance Sunday.

It was you who tried to instigate, what you describe as "abuse" that day.

I have not denied anything, if you read my posts I brought it up in the first place.

I can go and find dozens of similar threads from other posters where you have not piped up.

But, dig after dig at whatever I write.

Whatever, you class as a weekend is not shared by the rest of the UK and common wealth as they all pay their respects on RS.

Yet, you try and instigate something on that day in relation to a harmless thread which had no swearing in it and referred to the wm football phone on a football forum.

You now answer my questions, where was your indignation when disgusting views were put on here since my thread?

I am not going to take your constant digs trying to portray me some kind of forum Oppenheimer.

You say I don't like other opinions.

Show me, where I have said your opinion is wrong.

Or do I just put my opinion that is different on here.

The day I conform with some of sh it on here is the day pack it in.

Now answer the questions, what did you do in response to the homophobic and other posts?

A
Baggieblood, again you twist everything to appear the victim.

See your post below and answer the question I posed to your remarks about me on the 6th March 2017.

That was my point in first post here, that fans will be on TP's back before you know it including the likes of baggiemadguern, who I'm sure must be backing tp through gritted teeth.

[QUOTE=Baggiemadguern;38457498]BaggieBlood, what do you base the statement, where you refer to me, on?

You have clearly misunderstood my last pos (no7). It referred to the baited hook you dangled and the likelyhood of a good thread by Prando being taken off topic again for the sake of a squabble.

I would not have chosen Pulis. I have once, as far a I can recall, mentioned that perhaps we should move him on. However, I have more than once stated that I am currently happy he is at West Brom and I would be sorry if he left.


I shall wait for your response.

[BaggieBlood]

No, I don't want to be seen as a victim, I want to Know the answer to my question, what you did about what the homophobic comments?

I twist stuff, who wrote a response to my original thread on the actual RS?

Why you did it, was in the hope of getting the abusive reply you predicted in the post, but you didn't get it, and that is what hurts you.

The bait you dangled didn't get the response when you wanted it.

That is the disgrace of all this!!! How you tried to equate a harmless p iss taking thread into some kind of example of everything that is wrong in Britain, adding lies in it that I said "my team is better than yours". Posts like it which were posted loads on here and I'll put them up and see what you said then.

You've had your answers, now i want yours.

Re what you have selected above, why do you always select what you want, when clearly you have found the thread and to reactivate on here all you have to do to post a response to it.

Put the thread up let's see the context.

Just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I am denying you your right to write what you want, which is what you constantly do on with your digs like failed accountant this and that and you've saved your £600 and now supermarket.

Now answer the question what did you do about those off football topic homophobic comments?

[Baggiemadguern]

No, I don't want to be seen as a victim, I want to Know the answer to my question, what you did about what the homophobic comments?

I twist stuff, who wrote a response to my original thread on the actual RS?

Why you did it, was in the hope of getting the abusive reply you predicted in the post, but you didn't get it, and that is what hurts you.

The bait you dangled didn't get the response when you wanted it.

That is the disgrace of all this!!! How you tried to equate a harmless p iss taking thread into some kind of example of everything that is wrong in Britain, adding lies in it that I said "my team is better than yours". Posts like it which were posted loads on here and I'll put them up and see what you said then.

You've had your answers, now i want yours.

Re what you have selected above, why do you always select what you want, when clearly you have found the thread and to reactivate on here all you have to do to post a response to it.

Put the thread up let's see the context.

Just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I am denying you your right to write what you want, which is what you constantly do on with your digs like failed accountant this and that and you've saved your £600 and now supermarket.

Now answer the question what did you do about those off football topic homophobic comments?

You have failed to answer any questions I have posed. You continue to misinterpret a everything to fit your agendas.

Your ramblings make little or any sense.

I will respond in good time. I hope though you find it within yourself to answer my questions in respect of your distortions and none truths, I.e. where is said your Grandfather won the war on his own.

That the 11th November is not Armistice Day, throughout the aUK, that is recognised.

That you did not start the WM post.

Need I go on!

[BaggieBlood]

I mentioned the thread from the start and that i wrote it.

You cannot obviously understand when i say i didn't post anything on RS, you did with the sole intention of getting a reaction, which you didn't get.

The thread was a year ago and i wrote Armistice day instead of RS.

But, if you read my post it is clear i refer to RS.

I have also explained the comment towards my grandfather's service, it's subjective (that means i perceive it).

Now answer the questions in relation to all the other comments on 11/11 i have highlighted.

[holmleighchris]

You guys are amazing. I don't recall what I posted yesterday.