Have I made any comment on May's deal or any other deal? I don't think I have, I was responding to your confident assumption that only a small but passionate minority of the 52% who voted to Leave would accept No Deal and therefore to implement that would be the least democratic option.
I can't speak for 17million plus people, but the conversations I've had with Brexiteers follow a similar pattern of they simply voted to Leave the EU. They did so firmly with the knowledge that a "clean" break with No Deal was a very real possibility but they still put that tick in the Leave box. Much of the sentiment I've heard from Brexit voters (I'm talking members of public here not MP's and "experts") is that they would be content with the UK starting negotiations from a No Deal position and any deal on the table would be a bonus not a necessity. The clamor to get a deal began when the referendum vote came in and many experts and MPs etc suggested that No Deal would be a disaster. Then there are some people suggesting that it wouldn't be that bad, who do we believe? What are the agendas of people making such claims?
I agree with you that it's going to be very difficult to settle fairly and I do not have the answer. I don't think anyone does, just like nobody truly knows what will happen with any given Brexit outcome.
For what it's worth I don't know what to make of May's deal and the complexities of the Irish border are proving a real issue. I guess we will find out how workable the deal is once it goes to the vote.
A public vote on Gov't Deal vs No Deal would be interesting, because as you alluded to further up the thread, how would the 48% who opted to Remain vote? I would also confidently suggest that the section of people you talked about in one of your posts who prefer a soft Brexit with Customs Union etc still intact would be made up mostly of Remainers who have accepted that the original referendum result should stand.




Reply With Quote