Paul Hart

[Bridg4d_Pie_]

Why?

Because its highly possible like many others he does not have a clue what he does l suspect, so has jumped on board to kick him in the credentials.

[Big Bob]

Because its highly possible like many others he does not have a clue what he does l suspect, so has jumped on board to kick him in the credentials.

We'll tell me what he does for his large wages? He's done bugger all.
His wage bill will benefit the strengthening of the squad

[Bohinen]

Obviously we will require a substantial amount of compensation for our loss, but it would be unfair to stand in his way at this time.

[i961pie]

We'll tell me what he does for his large wages? He's done bugger all.
His wage bill will benefit the strengthening of the squad

How do you know he does bugger all? He may have advised NA to sign our 2 new players for all we know.

[DelroyFacey22]

We'll tell me what he does for his large wages? He's done bugger all.
His wage bill will benefit the strengthening of the squad

It's really not that difficult if you open your eyes...

“His remit will be a broad one to match his tremendous knowledge, experience and breadth of contacts.

“...while also being responsible for setting the club’s overall footballing philosophy with a keen emphasis on our development and academy set-ups."

“...build a footballing infrastructure which will help us achieve our long-term ambitions.”

In basic english - HE HAS LONG TERM GOALS, HE IS NOT HERE TO IMMEDIATELY IMPROVE THE FIRST TEAM and has now had 10 days of a transfer window where he can start to show some short term results and we've made what is considered by most to be a good signing in Jim O'Brien, I imagine people that dislike Paul Hart will say he had absolutely nothing to do with that despite the fact that Ardley has said on multiple occasions he's sat down with Neil Cox AND Paul Hart to discuss the transfer window...

[Bohinen]

and has now had 10 days of a transfer window where he can start to show some short term results and we've made what is considered by most to be a good signing in Jim O'Brien, I imagine people that dislike Paul Hart will say he had absolutely nothing to do with that despite the fact that Ardley has said on multiple occasions he's sat down with Neil Cox AND Paul Hart to discuss the transfer window...

Ardley said that he had the same agent as Jim O'Brien.

“We know him through my agent and several players who have played with him as well.

https://www.nottinghampost.com/sport...en-add-2405494

[McCullochisGod]

It's really not that difficult if you open your eyes...

“His remit will be a broad one to match his tremendous knowledge, experience and breadth of contacts.

“...while also being responsible for setting the club’s overall footballing philosophy with a keen emphasis on our development and academy set-ups."

“...build a footballing infrastructure which will help us achieve our long-term ambitions.”

In basic english - HE HAS LONG TERM GOALS, HE IS NOT HERE TO IMMEDIATELY IMPROVE THE FIRST TEAM and has now had 10 days of a transfer window where he can start to show some short term results and we've made what is considered by most to be a good signing in Jim O'Brien, I imagine people that dislike Paul Hart will say he had absolutely nothing to do with that despite the fact that Ardley has said on multiple occasions he's sat down with Neil Cox AND Paul Hart to discuss the transfer window...

The club should have already had a footballing philosophy in place....

[Notts78]

This thread is brilliant, because people can’t see or hear what Hart does, the assumption is, that it’s not a lot.
People assume he is on big money, how do you know? People slated Hardy for being too close to the football side of the business without the skills or knowledge to do so. So he gets someone in to look after the footballing side. Still slated.
His remit as mentioned is long term thinking. It’s not a quick fix. Has he helped secure contracts for some of the young lads who were on scholarships?
Is he involved in helping set up the new training facility?
When people talk about football philosophy, it’s not just the first team. It’s the philosophy they want to implement throughout the club, from the kids, to the ****s, to the scholars etc...

[Oldstripy]

This thread is brilliant, because people can’t see or hear what Hart does, the assumption is, that it’s not a lot.
People assume he is on big money, how do you know? People slated Hardy for being too close to the football side of the business without the skills or knowledge to do so. So he gets someone in to look after the footballing side. Still slated.
His remit as mentioned is long term thinking. It’s not a quick fix. Has he helped secure contracts for some of the young lads who were on scholarships?
Is he involved in helping set up the new training facility?
When people talk about football philosophy, it’s not just the first team. It’s the philosophy they want to implement throughout the club, from the kids, to the ****s, to the scholars etc...

Very good post

[LaxtonLad]

The club should have already had a footballing philosophy in place....

Of course they should, dating back to - when do you think? 1862?