+ Visit Barnsley FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Pinnock bid rejected

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    19,183
    Quote Originally Posted by EastStandRed View Post
    Kerr wants to come here and he’ll double his wages but we won’t pay what they want
    Are the reports that we offered £100,000 and then £200,000 correct ?

    We are right not to pay silly money, Who would pay, for example, £500,000 forra !8 yr old from Bury ?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    478
    The lad kerr at St Johnstone just signed a new deal keeping him there till 2022!! So that deal won't be happening.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    18,573
    Quote Originally Posted by SBRed48 View Post
    Are the reports that we offered £100,000 and then £200,000 correct ?

    We are right not to pay silly money, Who would pay, for example, £500,000 forra !8 yr old from Bury ?
    From what I’m told we never went to 200k

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    26,822
    Quote Originally Posted by EastStandRed View Post
    From what I’m told we never went to 200k
    Embarrassing .

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    18,573
    It was his agent who said he’d be available for £200k. I’m thinking that was above what he knew we would pay so used it to get him a pay rise instead

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    18,573
    Also the fact we haven’t had any bids for Pinnock meant we didn’t need him. He was the backup plan if a daft bid came in .

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,805
    If it was a good bid for Lindsay, I’d let him go. Think Jacko is by far the better. Keep Pinnock, .... let Lindsay go.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •