O/T DDay for Brexit..well sort of...

[MillerBill]

If we get forced into EU MEP elections we should all join the Brexit Party,vote for their candidates and give the EU hell when they all get elected and believe me they will,certainly in the North of England. We have been well and truly shafted by the Establishment led parliament.

May and Corbyn will sort nothing out if he's demanding to stay in the customs union, which prevents us negotiating new trade deals.If he cared about the country he would support this.The remainers are pulling the strings in the Westminster bubble but the MPs in this area should be supporting to come out of the EU, like we voted for like Caroline Flint has done.It's pathetic how they get all the support from the BBC to obstruct Brexit.

[Grist_To_The_Mill]

May and Corbyn will sort nothing out if he's demanding to stay in the customs union, which prevents us negotiating new trade deals.If he cared about the country he would support this.The remainers are pulling the strings in the Westminster bubble but the MPs in this area should be supporting to come out of the EU, like we voted for like Caroline Flint has done.It's pathetic how they get all the support from the BBC to obstruct Brexit.

The British Brainwashing Corporation

[great_fire]

The rosette-voters are the biggest obstacle to change in this country.

Keep getting lied to and screwed over but voting them in to do it again.

[Grist_To_The_Mill]

There’s a lot of people that vote for a particular political party when in reality that party they are voting for hasn’t existed for years.

Vote Whig !!

[ragingpup]

If you are happy to act as some sort of sentient search engine for Zyles, that’s cool. Just be careful that you don’t get your ‘facts’ from the likes of Russia Today. I’m still puzzled about where Zyle’s question came from and its relevance to Brexit.

If your argument is that the figures demonstrate that there isn’t a level playing field, I would have thought that it’s more about what is spent on election campaigns than what is coming in and there are statutory limits on election spending. How would you level the playing field? Do you want to deny people the right to donate to political parties? And how would you value non-monetary contributions to parties? You yourself have told us how you and swarms of other activists are ready to ‘get on the knocker’ to bring Labour’s message to people’s doorsteps. I can see it now – the people of Ilford answering a knock on the door to find you standing there, all ready to explain the signs that show that the end of the world is coming, but how they can be saved simply by asking JC to come into their lives. Do you travel in twos and have little leather pouches (or plastic ones given your vegan tendencies) full of literature that further explains JC’s message of love and hope?

Back to topic. Have you worked out the difference between the Withdrawal Agreement and the Political Declaration yet?

As I've already posted, the tories spent 19 million at the last election against labour's 11. I agree the electoral spend laws are there and that's a good start but can you explain to me why the tories spent a third more than Labour in 2017 election?

I ask in genuine curiosity. Logic would dictate that they spent this much more a) because the election laws allowed it somehow and b) because the tories could afford to spend that much as they had more to spend?

I may be wrong and you're the first to insist I usually am. But please put me right on this.

And don't suddenly stop talking to me, as you usually do when the argument gets a bit...hard...for you. I always endeavour to answer your questions however hard my little brain might struggle. It should be much easier with your bigger, and just a tad smugger, brain. Am example being that you challenged me to find one example of where youre beliefs match the Conservative. I found one. You accepted this and then challenged me to find another. I found five others. Then you went quiet. Why?

(re: yep hey the difference of WA and PD thanks. And yes I'm curious to know how Labour and Conservative and other mps want to solidify their demands for a customs union and other rights agreement into an agreement that can't be reopened (wa) or be made legally binding (PD). How do you think these oppositional politicians are hoping for it to be made legally binding so that we don't agree to a blind Brexit WA and then get shafted in future negotiations? Especially with darker politicians than May wanting to take the wheel. You know more than me. Try explain it?

If it can't be explained and such securities on worker, consumer and environmental guarantees can't be legally enforced in the PD or re-opened WA then in the circumstances I can't support it.

Re: me on doorstep. Very accurate. You been spying on me??

[Exiletyke]

For such a clever bugger as KA I had a quick look at some of his responses which contain the following
I'm puzzled
I'm confused
I'm not certain
I'm not sure
I'm at a loss
I don't understand
I can't believe
I'm just baffled

Not that clever is he?

[Exiletyke]

More reason to leave
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pafdzdZ3qXc

[Grist_To_The_Mill]

This months Private Eye gets it right

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...ByGD7Zm129l7aU

[great_fire]

More reason to leave
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pafdzdZ3qXc

What the Americans call "pork barrel" politics.

Love that in the comments; "the world'd longest-running cocktail party"

[Exiletyke]

Taking project fear to new levels

Lets frighten the thickos who voted to leave by threatening what the elite think the leavers will swallow
The remainers must be getting desperate

https://www.aol.co.uk/living/2019/04...o-deal-brexit/